Friday October 20, 2017
Home India Has Cricket a...

Has Cricket affected India positively or Negatively?

Cricket in India is not just a sport but an undying and inseparable emotion

The euphoria for Cricket. Wikimedia Commons

By Arya Sharan 

  • India’s national identity revolves around our enthusiasm for three things, Indian Politics, the raw and aboriginal film industry Bollywood, and the sport of Cricket
  • The modern day Indian society and the colossal change which we have witnessed in the last couple of decades have largely been influenced with Cricket
  • Cricket’s spectatorship has played a big role in the proliferation of Television sets in India

After retaining 15 players among the 17 who formed the Test squad for the Caribbean tour, India looks quite prepared for the upcoming three-Test series at home against the Black Caps.  And the choice of the squad has not come into as much of a surprise as the two dropped players were: all-rounder Stuart Binny and seamer Shardul Thakur.

Ever wondered why more than half of the Indian population is analyzing that who would be the better opening pair: Dhawan and Vijay or Vijay and KL Rahul? And why some of us are still drooling over Misbah’s beautifully crafted ton at Lord’s?

Follow NewsGram on Twitter

Probably, because Cricket is much more to India than just a sport.

To the much of the outside world, India’s national identity revolves around our enthusiasm for three things, Indian Politics, the raw and aboriginal film industry Bollywood, and the sport of Cricket.

Where the former two passions of Indians have created differences and consequently disturbances among the country due to the various ideologies that surround them, Cricket has always been our common idiosyncrasy. For instance, after independence, Indian Politics has broken Nation’s integrity in divisions of class, religions, castes and languages. And our film industry, although appeals to a large section of India but still fails to unify us as a whole.

The modern day Indian society and the colossal change which we have witnessed in the last couple of decades have largely been influenced with Cricket. The biggest reason for that change which has driven social and economic change to an extent and that which cannot be understood is television.  In 1990 India had some 30 million television households. Now there are around 200 million television households,”. And Cricket’s spectatorship has played a big role in the proliferation of Television sets in India.

Follow NewsGram on Facebook

“Indian Cricket actually reflects our country’s own growth story during this time. Cricket is so much a part of our National fabric that as India- its economy, society, and popular culture transformed itself, so did our most-loved sport” said Rahul Dravid during his speech at Bradman Oration in Canberra.

Indians fight for almost everything but unite to support their teams against the Kangaroos or the Proteas. The enormity of Cricket goes to such extent that the news of Sachin’s retirement made not only India but the whole world stop and sigh. Not all were Sachinist but billions of eyes were moist when Sachin walked back getting caught at slip on 15th November 2014, in his last outing as a Cricketer at Wankhede, Mumbai. Even after being a South African great, De Villiers’ 100th test became a moment of celebration for Indians at Chinnaswamy stadium, Bangalore. That shows the sport of Cricket connects our nation for a common cause!

The beauty of Cricket and the enormity of India. Source: Wikimedia Commons
The beauty of Cricket and the enormity of India.
Source: Wikimedia Commons

On April 2, 2011, the Indian streets were filled with the triumphant crowds as complete strangers embraced each other and exchanged words of praise, love, and happiness. Religion, caste, and language were no bar: as the ‘Indian unanimity’ eradicated our linguistic, regional or religious differences. India won the Cricket World Cup after a long and undying wait of 28 years, and once again, being Indian was a matter of collective pride.
There is nothing indispensable about cricket’s place in the Indian imagination, receptivity, and ancient culture; its position is not protected by any magical guarantees of permanence. It  is just a cultural activity, one with a history of eventualities propping it up;  some beautiful and brutal events of the present that deny eradicating its presence from the history of the revenant India.

– Arya Sharan is studying Journalism. Twitter: @NoOffense9

Next Story

India Demands Data on UN Staff Misconduct, Use of Immunity

United nations
India has demanded the secretariat disclose information about misconduct by UN staff. Flickr

United Nations, Oct 7: In an attempt to break the wall of silence around the crimes and UN staff misconduct and those on its assignments, India has demanded the secretariat disclose information about such cases and the immunity invoked against prosecutions.

Yedla Umasankar, the legal advisor in India’s UN Mission, touched a raw nerve here by criticising the UN on Friday for not vigorously following up allegations of serious wrongdoing by its employees who enjoy the equivalent of diplomatic immunity, a prized possession of its staff.

“It appears that the UN system itself may be reluctant to waive immunity even for serious misconduct carried out by its personnel while serving on its missions, so that such cases can be prosecuted by the host governments,” he told the General Assembly’s committee on legal affairs.

“Even a few of such instances or allegations of crimes committed by UN personnel is highly damaging for the image and credibility of the United Nations system and its work around the world,” he added.

His statement also touched on the practice of some countries that protect their wrongdoers at the UN.

Umasankar demanded that secretariat disclose how many cases of serious misconduct by UN personnel were registered and the number of cases where the UN refused to waive immunity to allow their prosecution.

He also wanted to know in how many cases the host country wanted the immunity waived so it can prosecute those accused; the number of times the UN asked the host country or the country that sent them to prosecute them; how many times it consulted countries before waiver of the immunity of their personnel and how many of them refused UN’s request to waive their citizens’ immunity.

The information he wanted does not cover the diplomats sent by member countries to represent them at UN bodies and enjoy diplomatic immunity with the nations hosting the UN facilities.

After scores of serious allegations of sexual misconduct by peacekeepers, especially exploitation of children, the UN vowed to uphold a policy of zero tolerance and began publishing data on such cases in peacekeeping operations including how they were dealt with.

Starting with the year 2015, it began identifying the nationalities of those accused.

However, it has not made public a roster detailing all the allegations and proven cases of serious misconduct across the entire UN.

While the focus has been on sexual exploitation and abuse reported on peacekeeping operations, Umasankar said that “at a broader level, the issue of accountability has remained elusive in some cases”.

He attributed it to “the complexities of legal aspects relating to sovereignty and jurisdiction”, the immunity or privileges that may be necessary for UN operations, and the capability or willingness of countries to investigate and prosecute the accused.

He noted that the UN itself cannot make criminal prosecutions.

While Indian laws has provisions for dealing with crimes committed abroad by its citizens, not all countries have them, he said.

Those countries should be encouraged and helped to implement such measures, he added. (IANS)

Next Story

Indo-Pak Peace Talks Futile Unless Islamabad Sheds Links with Terrorism, says Study

A Study by a U.S. think tank calls India and Pakistan talks futile, until Pakistan changes its approach.

India and Pakistan
India and Pakistan. Wikimedia.

A Top United States of America (U.S.) think tank, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace called the relations between India and Pakistan futile, unless Islamabad changes its approach and sheds its links with Jihadi terrorism.

A report “Are India and Pakistan Peace Talks Worth a Damn”, authored by Ashley J Tellis stated that such a move supported by foreign countries would be counterproductive and misguided.

The report suggests that International community’s call for the India and Pakistan talks don’t recognize that the tension between the two countries is not actually due to the sharp differences between them, but due to the long rooted ideological, territorial and power-political hatred. The report states that these antagonisms are fueled by Pakistani army’s desire to subvert India’s powerful global position.

Tellis writes that Pakistan’s hatred is driven by its aim to be considered and treated equal to India, despite the vast differences in their achievements and capabilities.

Also ReadMilitant Groups in Pakistan Emerge as Political Parties : Can Violent Extremism and Politics Co-exist? 

New Delhi, however, has kept their stance clear and mentioned that India and Pakistan talks cannot be conducted, until, the latter stops supporting terrorism, and the people conducting destructive activities in India.

The report further suggests that Pakistan sees India as a genuine threat and continuously uses Jihadi terrorism as a source to weaken India. The report extends its support to India’s position and asks other international powers, including the U.S., to extend their support to New Delhi.

Earlier in September, Union External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) slammed Pakistan for its continuous terror activities. She attacked the country by saying that India has produced engineers, doctors, and scholars; Pakistan has produced terrorists.

Sushma Swaraj further said that when India is being recognised in the world for its IT and achievements in the space, Pakistan is producing Terrorist Organisations like Lashkar-e-Taiba. She said that Pakistan is the world’s greatest exporter of havoc, death and inhumanity.

-by Megha Acharya  of NewsGram. Megha can be reached at @ImMeghaacharya. 

Next Story

Delhi University Students Win the Enactus World Cup 2017

India wins the Enactus World Cup 2017

Delhi University
India wins Enactus World Cup 2017. Twitter.

New Delhi, Sep 30: After an extremely tough competition between different students across the world in the Enactus World Cup 2017, Team India, represented by Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies (SSCBS), Delhi University emerged as the winner. The winning projects were project UDAAN and Mission RAAHAT.

Supporting the Government of India’s Digital India and Swachh Bharat Abhiyan mission, RAAHAT strives to effectively eliminate open defecation and provide safe sanitation in the urban slums; whereas, UDAAN aims at narrowing the digital divide between rural and urban India by setting up computer centres.

The Delhi University college team was led by the college’s faculty advisor, Anuja Mathur and student president of SSCBS Student President Aditya Sharma. The winning projects included 34 more members. The Enactus India and Enactus SSCBS were presented the Ford Better World Award of USD 50,000.

Also Read: Three Indian Women on Fortune’s Most Powerful Business Women

President and Global CEO, Enactus, Rachael A. Jarosh congratulated the Indian for winning the world cup and called the projects- RAAHAT and UDAAN, inspirational success stories of Enactus students, who are sowing businesses. She said that the projects address the real world challenges efficiently and innovatively. Enactus India President Farhan Pettiwala said that the two projects created by Delhi University students contribute to the country’s betterment, as they support the Government’s civil and social agenda.

Enactus is an international nonprofit organisation, with 72,000 students from 1,700 universities in 36 countries, which held its annual global event in London from September 26 to 28. A selected group of 3,500 students, business, government leaders and academicians across the globe were present at the event. Participants for the final competition round are qualified from over 72,000 university students. Each team has about 17 minutes to present their projects of entrepreneurial action.

Enactus works to nurture the entrepreneurial skills of students, and to address fundamental, social and economic challenges by developing innovative and experiential learning opportunities for students.

-by Megha Acharya of NewsGram. Megha can be reached at @ImMeghaacharya.