Friday October 20, 2017
Home Uncategorized Netaji did no...

Netaji did not die in the plane crash: Chandrachur Ghose


By Nithin Sridhar

Subhas Chandra Bose, who was popularly referred as “Netaji” was one of the most outstanding and tallest leaders of India’s freedom struggle. He was one of the first to give a call for “Poorna Swaraj” (complete freedom) for India. Bose, then revamped the Indian National Army (INA) to fight against the British and formed “Provisional Government of Free India” in Andaman and Nicobar islands with the help of the Japanese.

On 18-August-1945, after the Japanese had accepted unconditional surrender in the World War 2, Subhas Chandra Bose is believed to have died from third-degree burns when his plane crashed in Taiwan.

This has been the accepted version of the events, and accordingly India has been observing his death anniversary on 18-August. Over the last few years, this account of his death has been repeatedly questioned. There is an increasing pressure on the government to release all the classified files about Netaji Bose, so that the truth about his disappearance is brought out into the open.

Subhas_Chandra_BoseThis year would be his 70th death anniversary, if he had really died on that fateful day. On this occasion, NewsGram spoke to Chandrachur Ghose of “Mission Netaji” in an exclusive interview about the various mysteries surrounding Netaji’s disappearance and the current status of research on the issue.

Mission Netaji is a registered trust in New Delhi, which has been unearthing and piecing together various documents and information regarding Netaji’s life and disappearance.

Nithin Sridhar: Exactly 70 years ago, on this day, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is supposed to have died in a plane crash in Taiwan. For the last few years, you, AnujDhar and others in Mission Netaji have unearthed various documents and evidences, which raise many serious questions about the supposed death of Netaji. Can you share about the origins of Mission Netaji? And elaborate more on how this interest in unearthing Netaji files started?

Chandrachur Ghose: Mission Netaji originated as an online discussion group around 2004. It was the time when the Justice Mukherjee Commission of Inquiry was nearing the completion of its investigation into Netaji’s mysterious disappearance. The group comprised of a bunch of young professionals as well as students in their 20s and early 30s spread across several countries who were following the Commission’s work very closely.

Even before the Commission’s report was out, Anuj Dhar – who was then a journalist with the Hindustan Times, and part of the group – published his first book on the mystery, “Back from the Dead: Inside the Subhas Bose Mystery”. We were captivated by the findings, which clearly established that Bose did not die in the alleged plane crash in 1945, and might have been compelled to live incognito till much later.

We hoped that if a journalist could wade through the complex web of facts to reach that conclusion, it should not be difficult for a former Chief Justice of a High Court (Justice MK Mukherjee, heading the commission) to establish the same. But soon we found out that we had underestimated the powers of the Government.

Justice Mukherjee was denied access to documents, had to face opposition in visiting Taiwan and Russia, and there were rumors that forensic tests were tampered with. Despite these obstacles, Justice Mukherjee clearly showed the absurdity of the story of plane crash which supposedly killed Bose and said that the ashes being preserved at the Renkoji Temple in Japan are not of Netaji.

Our hopes were soon dashed as the Government rejected his findings without giving any reason. Even the parliamentary debate that followed was unceremoniously cut down. We found that the case had reached a dead end, and realized that unless we take it upon ourselves, the report would be buried and forgotten in no time.

This realization led us (Anuj Dhar, Sayantan Dasgupta, Sreejith Panickar, Vishal Sharma, Vinay Yadav and Arijit Choudhury) to give a formal shape to Mission Netaji by setting it up as a trust, with the objective of taking forward the investigation and to disseminate the information amongst the people.

NS: Though there are multiple theories about what happened to him later, do you believe it can be established beyond doubt that, Netaji did not die in that plane crash in 1945?

CG: It can certainly be established if all files and documents – those with the Ministries, with the intelligence agencies and in Prime Minister’s custody – are declassified.

It can be established if the Indian government seriously asks foreign governments (such as Russia, UK and the US) to share all secret documents they are holding on this issue. At present, let alone asking other governments to share information, the government of India is not even ready to disclose its correspondence with Russia on this matter.

NS: Can you summarize your findings so far regarding disappearance of Netaji in 1945? What is the current status of your investigations? Any latest development?

CG: The three key conclusions we have reached through our past decade of investigations are: (i) there is no question of Netaji’s death in Taiwan on 18 August 1945, (ii) probably he obtained asylum in the erstwhile Soviet Union, and (iii) the evidence which has surfaced in Faizabad is too serious to negate the possibility of Netaji’s return to India and living incognito.

Our latest finding was the discovery that the Indian Government was snooping on Bose family members till the late 1960s, perhaps even later. A lot of the information collected by the Intelligence Bureau was also shared with the British intelligence in the initial years post freedom. No Government would undertake such surveillance for a dead man.

NS: How has your journey been till now, in your perusal of Netaji’s disappearance? What were the challenges that you faced? How was the attitude of government and other administrative officials? Were they sympathetic or did they show indifference regarding the Netaji issue?


CG: When we formed Mission Netaji, our plan was to bring out all documents related to the mystery into the public domain. At that time, almost all documents (except some INA files declassified by the Vajpayee Government) related to the mystery were secret. The Right to Information Act, which was legislated in 2005, gave us the means to try and obtain those documents.

In addition to the Indian Government, we have contacted the US and UK Governments as well to bring out the relevant documents. While the various ministries of the Indian Government have declassified some documents and sent them to the National Archives in response to our campaign (especially, documents related to the Shah Nawaz Committee, GD Khosla Commission and the Justice Mukherjee Commission) they still hold a huge number of files which they have refused to declassify.

According to a former Home Secretary, declassification of these documents will lead to serious law and order problem within the country and will impact India’s relations with foreign countries. The current NDA Government is continuing with the legacy of the previous governments, although in private most politicians and bureaucrats disbelieve the plane crash story.

NS: Many theories and arguments have been forwarded regarding the fate of Netaji by those who believe he did not die during the plane crash. These include Netaji voluntarily hiding in Russia, Netaji being imprisoned and dying in Siberia, Netaji living as one Sri Saradanandaji in North Bengal, or Netaji living as Gumnami Baba in Uttar Pradesh. You both have studied and researched extensively on each of these possibilities. In your personal opinion based on all your research, which option or options appear as most probable? Or are the evidences in each case not sufficient enough to draw any such inferences?

CG: Many hypotheses were brought forward to the last two commissions of inquiry – the GD Khosla Commission and the MK Mukherjee Commission. Broadly these covered three areas – Netaji’s death prior to independence (but not in the plane crash), his incarceration in Russia followed by his murder, and his return to India and living as a Sadhu. While some claimed that he was eliminated by the Japanese, others claimed that he was brought back to India by the British on the eve of independence and shot dead in the Red Fort. There have been many anecdotes related to Netaji’s presence and ultimately death in Russia.


There have been an equal number of ‘baba’ theories claiming that he came back to India and lived under the guise of a holy man – the most famous of them being the Shaulmari case. However, none of the proponents of these hypotheses have been able to provide a shred of evidence in support of their claims. In the case of the Shaulmari Sadhu, the intelligence agencies followed him till his death in the 1970s and those documents conclusively prove that he was anyone but Subhas Bose. These documents, incidentally, are still classified.

Although it appears rational, given the flow of events and on the basis of other circumstantial evidence, that Netaji did indeed reach Russia, there is no documentary evidence to support the claim that he was eliminated either by Stalin or by Krushchev. The only hypothesis which is backed by some material evidence is that of the holy man of Faizabad who used to be addressed by his followers as Bhagwanji (Gumnami Baba).

As a result, the Uttar Pradesh High Court has asked the Government to investigate into the identity of this mysterious man who lived at various places in Uttar Pradesh for nearly three decades.

NS: Now, this question is purely subjective. In your investigations, have you come across any evidence or any pointers that reveal any probable reasons for Netaji living incognito in India? If we were to assume for a moment, that Netaji indeed returned to India and lived as a Sadhu, have you come across anything that reveals probable reasons behind his choice to live incognito as a Sadhu and not get involved in the politics of Independent India?

CG: Any attempt to answer this question will be no better than speculation. We haven’t been able to see all the material evidence related to Bhagwanji. Most of his material belongings are packed in large trunks now under lock and key at the Treasury at Faizabad. What we have been able to scrutinize till now are some documents retrieved by the Mukherjee Commission and some additional notes and letters preserved by his disciples and associates.

Although he is reported to have said that “My coming out is not in the interest of India,” and that he had undergone a complete metamorphosis of personality, we are not in a position to say with any certainty what exactly were the reasons for his remaining incognito.

To solve this mystery, we have asked the Government to set up a multi-disciplinary special investigation team working under the supervision of a sitting High Court or Supreme Court judge. The team should include former and current intelligence officers, historians, bureaucrats and members of the civil society.


NS: Various Bose’s family members have met Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding declassifying the files. Modi himself has reiterated time and again his commitment to Bose issue. But, what is the status on the ground? Have there been any concrete steps from the government regarding the issue? Do you believe NDA government is really serious about the issue or are they also toeing the same line as previous UPA governments?

CG: Members of the Bose family, led by the family spokesperson, Chandra Bose met Narendra Modi on this issue both before his election as the Prime Minister and later. Surya Bose, son of Netaji’s nephew Amiya Nath Bose also met the PM in Germany.

On all occasions, Mr. Modi has given the family a sympathetic hearing and has assured action. Prior to the elections, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders also demanded that papers related to Netaji should be released and that investigations should be taken forward to establish the fate of Netaji.

There has been, however, little action on the ground. If there is any intent, we are yet to see any reflection of it in the PM’s actions.

NS: Have you chalked out any plans in near future to pressurize the government to declassify all information regarding Netaji?

CG: Being a pressure group, we can only continue to generate awareness, network with opinion-makers and bring out new information from various sources, in order to build the pressure of public opinion.

The print and electronic media will have a big role to play in this. If the governments are indifferent, only the pressure of public opinion in a democratic polity can force them to act. The level of awareness and the quality and quantity of debates taking place in the social media are very different from what they were a decade ago.


It has taken us a decade to reach this stage, but we hope it will take lesser time to reach the next stage where the Government is compelled to take note of the campaign and take concrete steps. Apart from this, we are trying to utilize the RTI Act to bring out more information in the public domain. Approaching the judiciary is also under consideration.

NS: Do you believe that there is a nation-wide consensus that the government should declassify Netaji files?

CG: There is no doubt about the consensus on the issue of declassification. Even those who tend to believe that Netaji died in 1945 have come out in support of the declassification campaign. Transparency is a principle of good governance and we don’t think anyone buys the absurd claims that releasing these documents will harm India in any way.


  1. Declassification of all Netaji files may prove that J@PAN AND BRIT JOINTLY PLAYED A FOUL GAME WITH NET@JI; In WW-I, J@pan was a Briti$ ally. Before WW-II, J@pan-US trade war and political war started; this led to actual US-J@PAN war. So Briti$ became an enemy to J@pan by diplomatic manipulation as US-Briti$ alliance was there. After WW-II, J@pan revived their old link with Briti$. J@pan and Brit spies were well linked before WW-II. J@PAN SPIES AGREED TO ELIMINATE NET@JI. Motive was to appease Brit and purchase security for J@pan royal family. So, J@PAN HANDED OVER NET@JI TO BRITI$ AND BRITI$ EXECUTED HIM IN SECRETE. False news of air crash was J@pan fabrication. In any controversial case, liar is to be suspected. Net@ji plan to start second independence war with USSR help was known to J@pan. So, Brit and J@pan spies developed a common minimum program against pro-SOCIALIST agenda of Net@ji. Why should J@pan imperialism agree to patronize emergence of independent India as a permanent communist ally? Is it not more logical to fulfill Briti$ condition and purchase favor? Why J@pan royal family was not tried as a war criminal? What is the mystery behind this favor?
    There is another point about gumnami baba. Who was he? He was a dummy created as a part of common minimum program of J@pan and Brit imperialism. In axis camp, creation of dummy by plastic surgery was a common practice. Hitler and Mussolini were having number of dummies. J@pan sold Net@ji-dummy to Briti$. Briti$ deputed this dummy at faizabad of UP, with a purpose to create confusion regarding Net@ji. This confusion prevented nation to be doubtful about role of J@pan or Brit. So, gumnami baba of faizabad is a common creation of J@pan and Brit spies. Never had he told truth. If he had told anything, that must be lie. In a controversial case, liar is to be suspected. So, J@PAN SOLD NET@JI TO BRITI$ AND BRITI$ EXECUTED HIM IN SECRET. J@pan sold Net@ji-dummy to Briti$ and Briti$ deputed him at faizabad of UP. J@PAN SURRENDERED TO US-UK SIDE ON 15-AUG-1945. Net@ji’s last flight was on 18-aug-1945. A SURRENDERED J@PAN WAS NO LONGER AN ALLY OF AZAD HIND. They worked as per their new mentors, the Briti$.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Next Story

India Demands Data on UN Staff Misconduct, Use of Immunity

United nations
India has demanded the secretariat disclose information about misconduct by UN staff. Flickr

United Nations, Oct 7: In an attempt to break the wall of silence around the crimes and UN staff misconduct and those on its assignments, India has demanded the secretariat disclose information about such cases and the immunity invoked against prosecutions.

Yedla Umasankar, the legal advisor in India’s UN Mission, touched a raw nerve here by criticising the UN on Friday for not vigorously following up allegations of serious wrongdoing by its employees who enjoy the equivalent of diplomatic immunity, a prized possession of its staff.

“It appears that the UN system itself may be reluctant to waive immunity even for serious misconduct carried out by its personnel while serving on its missions, so that such cases can be prosecuted by the host governments,” he told the General Assembly’s committee on legal affairs.

“Even a few of such instances or allegations of crimes committed by UN personnel is highly damaging for the image and credibility of the United Nations system and its work around the world,” he added.

His statement also touched on the practice of some countries that protect their wrongdoers at the UN.

Umasankar demanded that secretariat disclose how many cases of serious misconduct by UN personnel were registered and the number of cases where the UN refused to waive immunity to allow their prosecution.

He also wanted to know in how many cases the host country wanted the immunity waived so it can prosecute those accused; the number of times the UN asked the host country or the country that sent them to prosecute them; how many times it consulted countries before waiver of the immunity of their personnel and how many of them refused UN’s request to waive their citizens’ immunity.

The information he wanted does not cover the diplomats sent by member countries to represent them at UN bodies and enjoy diplomatic immunity with the nations hosting the UN facilities.

After scores of serious allegations of sexual misconduct by peacekeepers, especially exploitation of children, the UN vowed to uphold a policy of zero tolerance and began publishing data on such cases in peacekeeping operations including how they were dealt with.

Starting with the year 2015, it began identifying the nationalities of those accused.

However, it has not made public a roster detailing all the allegations and proven cases of serious misconduct across the entire UN.

While the focus has been on sexual exploitation and abuse reported on peacekeeping operations, Umasankar said that “at a broader level, the issue of accountability has remained elusive in some cases”.

He attributed it to “the complexities of legal aspects relating to sovereignty and jurisdiction”, the immunity or privileges that may be necessary for UN operations, and the capability or willingness of countries to investigate and prosecute the accused.

He noted that the UN itself cannot make criminal prosecutions.

While Indian laws has provisions for dealing with crimes committed abroad by its citizens, not all countries have them, he said.

Those countries should be encouraged and helped to implement such measures, he added. (IANS)

Next Story

Indo-Pak Peace Talks Futile Unless Islamabad Sheds Links with Terrorism, says Study

A Study by a U.S. think tank calls India and Pakistan talks futile, until Pakistan changes its approach.

India and Pakistan
India and Pakistan. Wikimedia.

A Top United States of America (U.S.) think tank, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace called the relations between India and Pakistan futile, unless Islamabad changes its approach and sheds its links with Jihadi terrorism.

A report “Are India and Pakistan Peace Talks Worth a Damn”, authored by Ashley J Tellis stated that such a move supported by foreign countries would be counterproductive and misguided.

The report suggests that International community’s call for the India and Pakistan talks don’t recognize that the tension between the two countries is not actually due to the sharp differences between them, but due to the long rooted ideological, territorial and power-political hatred. The report states that these antagonisms are fueled by Pakistani army’s desire to subvert India’s powerful global position.

Tellis writes that Pakistan’s hatred is driven by its aim to be considered and treated equal to India, despite the vast differences in their achievements and capabilities.

Also ReadMilitant Groups in Pakistan Emerge as Political Parties : Can Violent Extremism and Politics Co-exist? 

New Delhi, however, has kept their stance clear and mentioned that India and Pakistan talks cannot be conducted, until, the latter stops supporting terrorism, and the people conducting destructive activities in India.

The report further suggests that Pakistan sees India as a genuine threat and continuously uses Jihadi terrorism as a source to weaken India. The report extends its support to India’s position and asks other international powers, including the U.S., to extend their support to New Delhi.

Earlier in September, Union External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) slammed Pakistan for its continuous terror activities. She attacked the country by saying that India has produced engineers, doctors, and scholars; Pakistan has produced terrorists.

Sushma Swaraj further said that when India is being recognised in the world for its IT and achievements in the space, Pakistan is producing Terrorist Organisations like Lashkar-e-Taiba. She said that Pakistan is the world’s greatest exporter of havoc, death and inhumanity.

-by Megha Acharya  of NewsGram. Megha can be reached at @ImMeghaacharya. 

Next Story

Delhi University Students Win the Enactus World Cup 2017

India wins the Enactus World Cup 2017

Delhi University
India wins Enactus World Cup 2017. Twitter.

New Delhi, Sep 30: After an extremely tough competition between different students across the world in the Enactus World Cup 2017, Team India, represented by Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies (SSCBS), Delhi University emerged as the winner. The winning projects were project UDAAN and Mission RAAHAT.

Supporting the Government of India’s Digital India and Swachh Bharat Abhiyan mission, RAAHAT strives to effectively eliminate open defecation and provide safe sanitation in the urban slums; whereas, UDAAN aims at narrowing the digital divide between rural and urban India by setting up computer centres.

The Delhi University college team was led by the college’s faculty advisor, Anuja Mathur and student president of SSCBS Student President Aditya Sharma. The winning projects included 34 more members. The Enactus India and Enactus SSCBS were presented the Ford Better World Award of USD 50,000.

Also Read: Three Indian Women on Fortune’s Most Powerful Business Women

President and Global CEO, Enactus, Rachael A. Jarosh congratulated the Indian for winning the world cup and called the projects- RAAHAT and UDAAN, inspirational success stories of Enactus students, who are sowing businesses. She said that the projects address the real world challenges efficiently and innovatively. Enactus India President Farhan Pettiwala said that the two projects created by Delhi University students contribute to the country’s betterment, as they support the Government’s civil and social agenda.

Enactus is an international nonprofit organisation, with 72,000 students from 1,700 universities in 36 countries, which held its annual global event in London from September 26 to 28. A selected group of 3,500 students, business, government leaders and academicians across the globe were present at the event. Participants for the final competition round are qualified from over 72,000 university students. Each team has about 17 minutes to present their projects of entrepreneurial action.

Enactus works to nurture the entrepreneurial skills of students, and to address fundamental, social and economic challenges by developing innovative and experiential learning opportunities for students.

-by Megha Acharya of NewsGram. Megha can be reached at @ImMeghaacharya.