Sunday, March 7, 2021
Home Uncategorized RTI plea rejected by Govt , protects RAW agents abroad

RTI plea rejected by Govt , protects RAW agents abroad

COUNTERVIEW‎‎‎‎‎: New Delhi: Tuesday, March 29, 2016.
The Government of India has rejected a right to information (RTI) plea seeking information about “laws, rules and regulations” that explain the nature and the extent of legal protection provided to officers and employees of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), who are engaged in overseas intelligence operations.
In his RTI plea to the Cabinet secretariat in January 2016, senior Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) activist Venkatesh Nayak had also sought information regarding “procedures, norms, instructions or guidelines” that contain details of the action that must be taken by the Government of India to defend the officers and employees of RAW engaged in overseas intelligence operations.
He had also sought information the action that the Government of India is obliged to take upon receipt of information about the death of any officer or employee of RAW who was engaged in overseas intelligence operations, due to any adverse action taken against him/her by any agency in a foreign country.
Nayak says, by refusing the information, the Government of India is stating that, while it wants citizens to work for them to gather and analyse intelligence for maintaining the external security of the country, they will not tell people what mechanisms exist for ensuring their safety and security.
The RTI plea acquires importance against the backdrop of a recent report of arrest of a person of Indian origin by Pakistan’s law enforcement agencies. While Pakistan summoned India’s envoy to that country and issued a demarche about the alleged “interference” by India in its internal affairs in Balochistan through R&AW, the official spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs vehemently denied it.
However, the Ministry confirmed the apprehended individual is a retired Indian Navy officer and has sought consular access to him.
Pointing out that “there is no information in the public domain about what must be done, if, heavens forbid, an Indian intelligence operative were to be murdered abroad”, Nayak believes, “This is a concern that is very much valid even though it must not be taken as a comment on the latest incident of the apprehension of an Indian national in Pakistan.”
Two weeks after the RTI plea was filed, Cabinet Secretariat rejected the RTI application stating that all the information sought pertained to the organization is “exempt” from the purview of the RTI Act under Section 24. “Interestingly, the CPIO does not even mention the name, R&AW in his reply. So high is the level of secrecy”, comments Nayak.
Saying that the reply “is in tune with past attempts which frustrate all efforts to secure basic transparency in the working of exempt organizations”, Nayak says, in 2014 the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) replied to an RTI plea that the actions of left wing militants in blowing up a CRPF convoy resulting in the deaths of CRPF personnel in Bihar and Chhattisgarh during election duty “did not amount to human rights violation of the deceased”.
“I hope the same attitude is not adopted by the intelligence agencies in relation to their operatives who are posted abroad”, Nayak says, adding, “The citizens of India have the right to know what measures the Government is required to undertake by law to ensure the safe return of its external intelligence operatives even though they may not have been involved in the latest case as clarified by the Government.”
“R&AW is also not transparent about the manner in which it deals with RTI applications year after year”, Nayak says, adding, “The Central Information Commission’s Annual Report for 2014-15 lists only one instance of rejection of an RTI application under Section 24 for the entire year.”
Noting that “it is highly unlikely that R&AW received only one RTI application during this period”, Nayak says, the Intelligence Bureau (IB) “received more than a thousand RTI applications in 2014-15. Of these 95.5% requests were rejected by invoking Section 24 of the RTI Act.” The IB is India’s premier internal intelligence agency.

 

credits : http://mahitiadhikar.blogspot.in/2016/03/govt-of-india-refuses-to-make-public.html?m=1

STAY CONNECTED

19,120FansLike
362FollowersFollow
1,773FollowersFollow

Most Popular

How COVID Pandemic Changed The Nature of Relationship Between Physical and Mental Health

Exercise has for long been recommended as cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with depression, yet new evidence suggests that the Covid-19 pandemic changed the nature...

Know Here Why Most of The Young Women Feel That IT, Tech Jobs Belong To Men

When it comes to the IT and tech industry, only 19 percent of women working in the sector said they were inspired by a...

International Women’s Day 2021: Significance, Importance and Quotes To Celebrate

The dynamic beings who have the most crucial responsibility to carry forward one generation to the other are none other than Women! In every...

10 Off-Beat Beach Destinations in Maharashtra For All Beach-Lovers!

If you really want to explore offbeat destinations then Maharashtra boasts of extensive beaches where you can seek some quiet time or adventure. With...

Consumption of Vegan Food Linked To Poorer Bone Health

People consuming a vegan diet may have poorer bone health, suggested a new study. In a new study, the bone health of vegans, as well...

AI identifies Currently Available Medicines To Treat Alzheimer’s Disease

Researchers have developed a method based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) that rapidly identifies currently available medications that may treat Alzheimer's disease. The method could represent...

How This Visual Effect Specialist Created Sensation With Tom Cruise’s Deepfakes

A visual effects specialist who created deepfake photos and videos of Hollywood actor Tom Cruise that went viral on various social media platforms, has...

Privatisation May Lead To Increased Charges, Lower Profits For Public: AINBOF

All India Nationalised Banks Officers Federation (AINBOF) has opposed privatisation of public sector banks as it will lead to increase in service charges and...

Recent Comments