Wednesday September 19, 2018
Home Uncategorized AAP declining...

AAP declining while Congress going strong: Punjab Congress chief

0
//
96
Republish
Reprint

New Delhi: Punjab Congress chief and MP, Amarinder Singh, said his party was getting ‘stronger’ while Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) image was on a ‘decline’. This would assist his party in the 2017 Punjab state assembly polls, he expressed hope.

Taking a jibe at Arvind Kejriwal, Singh said, “initially when he (Kejriwal) was with Anna (Hazare), he said that he would never contest polls and now he has become the CM (of Delhi). How can you trust him,” he asked.

He also highlighted the changing fortunes of AAP by pointing to the recently concluded by-elections. This he said showed the decreasing ‘jaazba’ for AAP.

Pointing to the decline, he said, “I’ll give you an example. AAP won the Patiala parliamentary seat (2014). Preneet Kaur from Patiala city (part of Parliamentary seat) was ahead by 5,000 votes but when by-elections (for Patiala city) were held later, Preneet Kaur won the seat by 17,000 votes. So AAP’s image is going down not here but everywhere.”

He further added that AAP is still a fledgling party and with relatively inexperienced leaders.

“AAP is a new phenomenon. There is no organisational set up (in the party)… AAP has no experience. Such as Singh Chottepur, who was a friend of mine remained a minister in Barnala government for three months. It is the only government experience they have. With people like Bhagwant Mann (Sangrur MP), how will you manage the state when problems are so immense like a debt of Rs 1.25 lakh crore debt etc,”” he said.

Only Congress is capable of confronting the problems plaguing his home state, he added.

“It is the Congress which can bring the state out of the problems,” he said.(Inputs from various sources)(image courtesy: apnapatiala.com)

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 NewsGram

Next Story

Awakened to The Congress’s Blatant Support to Anti-Nation Forces

This time from foreign soil, Germany, Rahul Gandhi has spoken out his mind

1
Rahul Gandhi
Rahul Gandhi.

By Salil Gewali

Sometimes I feel too confused that what makes a leader speak so badly about the country. Still more confusing is that the same leader is projected as the only fittest in the country to be the Prime Minister.

This time from foreign soil, Germany, Rahul Gandhi has spoken out his mind. With gay abandon he claimed the lack of employment is the cause behind the rise of ISIS. If we analyze such statement objectively, we see that the unprecedented danger is looming large around this country not because of the citizens but because of the irresponsible leaders.

Is it not too shocking that we tolerate a bunch of leaders all through who, with impunity, tramples upon prudence and embrace the fickleness by speaking with such rashness? The ridiculous ranting is what Rahul Gandhi is good at. How many immature gaffes he has committed in last one year. One finds it too sickening to see people defending what Rahul utters out? Again, to his party’s sycophants, each word spoken out by him is worth its weight in gold.

Could any conscious people come across the board to evaluate what will be the likely repercussion when the projected leader goes to the extent to connect the unemployment of youth with ISIS? What do you say — if a certain father harps on that his children will be dagger-wielding murderers if they will not get jobs? What message does it send out? Will such ideas not “viciously affect” the thought process of the children in future? One wonders how the constitution allows the leaders to speak out such dangerous language. Will it not encourage the treasonous activities within the country leading to the decline of the security and sovereignty of the nation?

Rahul Gandhi
Rahul Gandhi.

Despite the height of stupidity, Rahul Gandhi is capable to earn more admirers then criticizers. Is it a pointer to the fact that one man’s loss of sense should lead to the “loss of sense” of other intellectuals? Or do we love an “individual” from a particular family more than our own “country”? On what ground is an “individual” more respect-worthy than the “party”, country and its constitutional ethos? This is in fact a very ominous trend which this country is witnessing now.

True, our Indian polity needs a strong opposition. People do not disagree at all that Congress should not be the one. Yes, this party can alone match well with the rival BJP. But sadly, the party is failing when Rahul started to become more vocal. The party with so smaller number of MPs has not yet “acknowledged” that its rapid decline now is because it continues to sing a hymn to one family only. The conscious Congress party leaders should come down to the ground and critically assess the people’s opinions and their concerns. They all have been intensely disillusioned by the dynasty politics.

Has this “family” not pleasantly ignored a very learned and seasoned leader Pranab Mukherjee by reducing him to just a rubber stamp?  Are Sachin Pilot, Ghulam Nabi Azad, C. P. Joshi, Ashok Gehlot, Jyotiraditya, Scindia, Priya Dutt, less Indian? If BJP can groom Kiren Rijiju why can’t Congress groom the astute leader of the northeast like Gaurav Gogoi or Vincent Pala or Mukul Sangma ? No exaggeration, Sachin Pilot could diplomatically handle the political situation and articulate the party policies far more maturely than entire Gandhi family members put together.

Enough is enough. People now anxiously await the REVIVAL of political parties with vibrant faces who genuinely love the country. We have seen enough of the anti-nation activities incited by the Gandhi family.  It’s totally wrong to be the puppets of a wrong family and spell doom for the nation. PM Modi rightly says that service to the country is far more important than the service to the family.

Salil Gewali is a well-known writer and author of ‘Great minds on India’. Twitter: @SGewali.

One response to “Awakened to The Congress’s Blatant Support to Anti-Nation Forces”

  1. During the UPA/Congress government there had been numerous terrorist attacks, Mumbai trains, Zaveri Bazar, 26-11, plus the attacks in Ahmedabad, Pune etc. Was this situation because the terrorists could not find jobs during their rule? Compared to that there are very few terrorist attacks in India in last four years. So the terrorists must be gainfully employed in last four years !