Wednesday March 20, 2019
Home Business Aircel, Jio, ...

Aircel, Jio, or Facebook: Will the Giants be Accountable?

For many such businesses, Guidelines, goodwill, and integrity are only the initial eyewash to climb the ladder of material success.

0
//
Facebook
Facebook is working on launching Athena, its own Internet satellite, early in 2019, the WIRED reported. Pixabay

by Salil Gewali

It quite seems that the Mobile company Aircel has taken off to Malaysia with its booty. No wonder, with a crafty shuffle of the legal papers this company successfully got itself declared bankrupt in India. Very understandable, Anil Ambani received first the big blow of Jio Mobile and now Aircel.  Do you know, till some days back Aircel was making its last-ditch efforts to loot the extra penny from the unsuspecting consumers? Even I got tempted and recharged my sim card with Rs 399 rupees as the plan was for 84 days. But I could use the service for not more than 15 days. Will the company “refund” my money, and also the money it has pinched from the lakhs of other customers like me? In this age of capitalism, by mere declaring bankruptcy/innocence, the company can be absolved from all of its sins. How is it morally acceptable and justified? Is it not the travesty of business integrity? Now we can’t overlook how Aircel customers are suffering in order to port out from Aircel to other service providers. Since the service has been suspended the customers are feeling rudderless, moving from the pillar to post, to restore the service through other companies.

Anil Ambani
“They are not just beggars, but in some cases,  they are like “robbers” because they disappear for good without refunding the poor customers’ hard-earned money”. Wikimedia Commons

ALSO READ: Exclusive: Why Gorkhaland for Gorkhas?

Moreover, how is the company bankrupt? How on earth it’s owner – Ananda Krishnan (partner being Mr. Raja Arshad…), one of the richest businessmen in Malaysia, having multi companies including media, oil, gas, and properties, is insolvent? No, not at all. His other business sectors are minting money like anything. But why is he not bothering to return back the customers’ money from the income of other sources? One angry customer from Police Bazar remarks – “Such companies’ owners are high-tech beggars with the digital pots in their hands because we are asked us to pay them online, lol!”.  But, instantly his another friend corrected, “They are not just beggars, but in some cases,  they are like “robbers” because they disappear for good without refunding the poor customers’ hard-earned money”.

Yes, for money and to fulfill their desire to amass wealth these incredibly rich people can go to an incredible extent. Guidelines, goodwill, and integrity are only the initial eyewash to climb the ladder of material success. These business virtues and ethics might be just junked away like the garbage if something goes amiss and the profit graph falls.

ALSO READ: US-North Korea Tensions: Are we on the brink of Destruction?

Mark Zuckerberg
What about the super-rich Mark Zuckerberg? Is he content with his vast fortunes? He is virtually not. Wikimedia Commons

Does Anil Ambani not owe each of us money which we trustingly pay to his Reliance Communication? Please tell me if Ambani has refunded any of the customers’ money and also the security deposits to the tune of corers? So far not. Because rich men do not fear God, they usually fear less-money-in-their wallets.

What about the super-rich Mark Zuckerberg? Is he content with his vast fortunes? He is virtually not. So, his Facebook has other wings that shake hands with the depraved company like “Cambridge Analytica”.  They use our personal data as ingredients to cook up the dishes that sells in the black market.   What is most bizarre is that we still call such people great men and we idolize them without sense and without shame? But I myself prefer to call them cheaters, frauds and uncouth brutes. They are never sent to the jail, so they keep playing “golf” with the virtues of humanity.

Salil Gewali is a well-known writer and author of ‘Great minds on India’. Twitter: @SGewali. 

Next Story

4,000 Viewed NZ Mosques Shootings Live, Claims Facebook

Facebook said it removed the original video and hashed it to detect other shares visually similar to that video and automatically remove them from Facebook and Instagram

0
facebook, social media
Facebook, Messenger and Instagram apps are displayed on an iPhone, March 13, 2019, in New York. Facebook said it is aware of outages on its platforms including Facebook, Messenger and Instagram. VOA

Facing the flak over its inability to spot and remove the livestreaming of New Zealand mosque’s shooting, Facebook on Tuesday said 4,000 people viewed it before being taken down.

“The video was viewed fewer than 200 times during the live broadcast. No users reported the video during the live broadcast,” Chris Sonderby, VP and Deputy General Counsel, said in a blog-post. “Including the views during the live broadcast, the video was viewed about 4,000 times in total before being removed from Facebook,” Sonderby added.

Strapped with a GoPro camera to his head, the gunman broadcasted graphic footage of shooting via Facebook Live for nearly 17 minutes. It was later shared in millions on other social media platforms.

Fifty people were killed in the shootings at Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Avenue Masjid in Christchurch on March 15 after 28-year-old Australian national Brenton Tarrant opened indiscriminate firings.

According to Facebook, the first user report on the original video came in 29 minutes after the video started, and 12 minutes after the live broadcast ended. “Before we were alerted to the video, a user on ‘8chan’ posted a link to a copy of the video on a file-sharing site,” said Sonderby.

Facebook, photos
This photograph taken on May 16, 2018, shows a figurine standing in front of the logo of social network Facebook on a cracked screen of a smartphone in Paris. VOA

“We removed the personal accounts of the named suspect from Facebook and Instagram, and are identifying and removing any imposter accounts that surface,” he said.

Facebook said it removed the original video and hashed it to detect other shares visually similar to that video and automatically remove them from Facebook and Instagram.

Also Read- Netflix Not to Integrate its Services with Apple Streaming Platform

“Some variants such as screen recordings were more difficult to detect, so we expanded to additional detection systems, including the use of audio technology,” Sonderby said.

“In the first 24 hours, we removed about 1.5 million videos of the attack. More than 1.2 million of those videos were blocked at upload, and were therefore prevented from being seen on our services,” he said. (IANS)