Monday March 25, 2019
Home Opinion Are we free? ...

Are we free? How Anglophonic masters are now pursuing remote controlled colonization

2
//

hqdefault

By Dr Kallol Guha

“Your God is dark like Ravi Shankar Prasad, but your matrimonial ads insist on white-skinned brides” This statement from Sharad Yadav raised commotion in Lok Sabha. Sharad Yadav’s comment is being branded as “Sexists” etc. But the big question is that why Anglophonic circle of India is silent on it?

Mindset is being created among Indians through highly sophisticated and powerful propaganda that white skin symbolizes everything superlative. Images from Bollywood or ads in the main stream media depict upper class Indians are all white and underclass as dark skin. Villains, servants, and beggars are invariably dark skin.  The movie versions of Indian epics turned Mahabharata heroes like Krishna, Draupadi and Arjun into white skinned characters – even though they have been portrayed as dark skinned in the original text.

There is no question that undeclared goal of this sinister and subtle marketing is aimed at psychologically conditioning Indians of all sections to accept supremacy of the white ‘Anglophonic Species’. To that extent the marketing has already achieved remarkable success. But why? Answer is relatively simple. Masses conditioned to accept white ‘Anglophonic Species’ are also likely to accept their dominance over affairs of India.

Here, is the relevance of Macaulay’s doctrine who proposed to create a breed of Indians who would be English in all possible features except in their looks and will remain delinked from their country of origin. This breed could look after the interest of the Anglophonic masters in India which is like a remote controlled colonization. No special inquiry is required to understand the Anglophonic Indian ruling class is just an out and out replica of what was envisaged by Macaulay. It might be useful to recall that during the movement of “India Against Corruption” by Anna Hazare it was discussed that as much as a trillion Dollar worth of black money has been transferred from India to overseas. If so-that money was not send to China or Russia or Brazil or Africa or Latin America. It obviously went to the place controlled by Anglophonic circles. In India who owns the mainstream press? Who controls primary and secondary schools? Who is awarded “Bharat Ratna”  for converting millions of Hindus into another religion. Above all who owns largest share of non-agricultural land in India- next to Government? Are you ready? The church !  The entire network is connected to Anglophonic world,  whose skin color is not dark. Do you now see why Shard Yadav’s comments get that resistance and why there is deathly silence on the issue of dark and light skin issue?

(The writer is the President & CEO of Saint James School of Medicine in Illinois.)

 

  • Ishan Kukreti

    I think the author here is mixing color with language. All white people are not Anglophones. Though the dominance of English over other languages is a sad fact. Its a colonial aftertaste in the country’s mouth.

    And lets not blame Christianity, it is a missionary religion and converting the ‘other’ is a part of it. And lets not forget the blood on the hands of the Vedic religion. Why is the birth place of Buddhism has such a tiny Buddhist population? Where are Ajivikas?

  • Dear Dr. Guha,

    While it might be true that the “Anglophonic” section of the society is dominant in most countries (considering English is one of the most spoken languages globally), especially in a rising economy like India, the blame cannot necessarily be put on the “Mindset (is) being created among Indians through highly sophisticated and powerful propaganda that WHITE SKIN symbolizes everything superlative”.
    Firstly, India’s “Anglophonic circle” did not remain silent on Sharad Yadav’s alleged sexist statements. The mainstream media that you conveniently blame raised the issue, held discussions and in fact, managed to set the agenda for social media users to criticize Yadav for the next 3-4 days. And Indian social media users are largely the “Anglophonic cirlce” that you talk about in your piece.
    I agree that Indian ads, as much as Indians themselves, encourage the colonial hangover, but to outrightly rephrase the dominance of the West as dominance of the White is too generalized a notion.

SHARE
  • Ishan Kukreti

    I think the author here is mixing color with language. All white people are not Anglophones. Though the dominance of English over other languages is a sad fact. Its a colonial aftertaste in the country’s mouth.

    And lets not blame Christianity, it is a missionary religion and converting the ‘other’ is a part of it. And lets not forget the blood on the hands of the Vedic religion. Why is the birth place of Buddhism has such a tiny Buddhist population? Where are Ajivikas?

  • Dear Dr. Guha,

    While it might be true that the “Anglophonic” section of the society is dominant in most countries (considering English is one of the most spoken languages globally), especially in a rising economy like India, the blame cannot necessarily be put on the “Mindset (is) being created among Indians through highly sophisticated and powerful propaganda that WHITE SKIN symbolizes everything superlative”.
    Firstly, India’s “Anglophonic circle” did not remain silent on Sharad Yadav’s alleged sexist statements. The mainstream media that you conveniently blame raised the issue, held discussions and in fact, managed to set the agenda for social media users to criticize Yadav for the next 3-4 days. And Indian social media users are largely the “Anglophonic cirlce” that you talk about in your piece.
    I agree that Indian ads, as much as Indians themselves, encourage the colonial hangover, but to outrightly rephrase the dominance of the West as dominance of the White is too generalized a notion.

Next Story

U.S. and Russia To Come Up With An Agreement On How To Resolve Venezuela Crisis

Moscow strongly warned the United States “against any temptation to resort to military power” in Venezuela. Russian state news agency TASS quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov as saying. “We assume that Washington treats our priorities seriously, our approach and warnings.”

0
U.S.
Special Representative for Venezuela Elliott Abrams speaks at the State Department in Washington, March 15, 2019. VOA

U.S. Special envoy for Venezuela, Elliott Abrams says Russia and the United States have failed to come to an agreement on how to resolve the crisis in Venezuela following talks in Rome. He did not rule out a future meeting between both sides and said the talks helped both sides gain a better understanding of each other’s views.

The United States Special envoy for Venezuela, Elliot Abrams, described the Rome talks with Russian officials on the crisis in Venezuela as “useful, substantial and serious.” He said the conversations allowed the United States to understand that “Russia sees the crisis in Venezuela as very serious, unlike President Maduro,” mainly, Abrams said, in regard to the economic and humanitarian aspects.

Following a meeting with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, Abrams said, “We did not come to a meeting of the minds, but the talks were positive in the sense that I think both sides emerged with a better understanding of the other’s views.” The two sides remain at odds over the legitimacy of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

The United States has recognized self-declared President Juan Guaido as Venezuela’s legitimate leader, while Russia continues to recognize Mr. Maduro. Italy also has not given Mr. Guaido recognition.

FILE - Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido, who many nations have recognized as the country's rightful interim ruler, takes part in a rally against President Nicolas Maduro's government in Valencia, Venezuela, March 16, 2019.
Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido, who many nations have recognized as the country’s rightful interim ruler, takes part in a rally against President Nicolas Maduro’s government in Valencia, Venezuela, March 16, 2019. VOA

Abrams met with the Pietro Benassi, the diplomatic adviser of Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte. Abrams said the United States is not applying pressure on the Italian government to recognize Guaido as Venezuela’s legitimate president.

The meetings in the Italian capital took place as the United States imposed fresh sanctions on Venezuela, this time targeting the state-run gold mining company Minerven and its president.

President Donald Trump and visiting Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro speak during a news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House, March 19, 2019.

But at the White House, President Donald Trump on Tuesday reiterated that “all options are open” on the future of Venezuela.

“We are not looking for anything other than taking care of a lot of people that are starving and dying in the streets. What’s happening there is a disgrace,” he said.

Abrams stressed that negotiations are not underway because “We do not negotiate the future of Venezuela with Russia or others because the future of Venezuela will be chosen by the Venezuelans.”

Also Read: Know The Venezuelans Ways to Cope with Inflation and Hunger

Moscow strongly warned the United States “against any temptation to resort to military power” in Venezuela. Russian state news agency TASS quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov as saying. “We assume that Washington treats our priorities seriously, our approach and warnings.”

Abrams did not exclude a future meeting with Russia on the Venezuela crisis but said no date had been set. The White House said President Trump will also discuss the Venezuela crisis with Caribbean leaders on Friday. (VOA)