Americans say Austin, Texas, is the best place to live in the United States, according to an annual survey done by U.S. News & World Report.
For the second year in a row, Austin came out on top among the 125 largest metropolitan areas. The 2018 survey measures a city’s affordability, employment market and quality of life.
Behind Austin are Colorado Springs, Colorado, Denver, Colorado, Des Moines, Iowa, and Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Rounding out the top 10 are Portland, Oregon, Huntsville, Alabama, Washington, D.C., Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Seattle, Washington.
“When deciding on a place to settle down, it’s important to understand that where a person lives can impact their well-being,” said Kim Castro, executive editor at U.S. News.
“U.S. News created the Best Places to Live to highlight areas across the country that have the characteristics residents are looking for, including steady job growth and affordability. The top-ranked places are areas where citizens can feel the most fulfilled socially, physically and financially.”
Some of the biggest movers included Colorado Springs, which moved from the 11th spot last year to No. 2. U.S. News chalks that up to “a booming job market and high quality of life.”
Huntsville is a first-time top 10 city, and the survey found that it offers “residents in the science, technology, engineering and math fields employment opportunities, while also holding the highest value score out of all places on this year’s list.”
According to a U.S. News spokesperson, it’s hard to tell the benefits a city might receive after appearing on the list.
“Best Places to Live is only in its third year, so it’s too soon to tell whether any single event, ranking or company has had a major impact on any one place in such a short period of time,” said Anna Beth Jager in an email. “Because local economies, housing markets and quality of life are less likely to see drastic change so immediately, we’re expecting to see shifts — whether as a direct result of the Best Places to Live ranking or other factors — take place more gradually.”
Some Austin residents took to social media with their thoughts on the city being named best place to live. One common point of view was to cheer the results, but also to tell people not to move there, as many fear a large influx of newcomers will change a city that residents celebrate for being “weird.”
In fact, the unofficial motto of Austin is “Keep Austin Weird.” VOA
When kidnappers assaulted a woman on a Guatemala City street and ripped her infant daughter from her arms, DNA testing came to the rescue. A positive match helped reunite mother and child after the baby turned up abandoned at a church with no identification.
In addition to identifying kidnap victims, DNA tests have helped connect adoptees with their biological parents and U.S. immigrants with their families.
Now, DNA technology is being called upon to bring together families separated at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Migrants’ advocates, however, say using genetic testing in this way raises technical, legal and ethical issues.
While several companies have offered to donate kits, leading migrant rights groups have turned them down.
Genetic tests have helped an organization called DNA-Prokids reconnect more than 1,000 missing children with their families in Mexico, Nepal, Thailand and several other countries, including the kidnapping case in Guatemala City.
Jose Lorente, a professor of forensic medicine at the University of Granada in Spain, started the organization. Lorente said he was moved by the children he saw on the streets in cities around the world. Many were victims of trafficking and had parents who were looking for them.
Lorente said he hopes to establish a worldwide network of DNA testing labs to help children everywhere.
“This is a way to send a message to people trafficking children,” he said. “The message is, from now on, it is not going to be so easy to steal and traffic a child because he or she will be immediately identified.”
Lorente said DNA tests could help make sure children coming across the U.S.-Mexico border are not being trafficked.
“It’s going to be a small percentage,” Lorente said, but added there may be cases in which ill-intentioned adults claim children who are not their own.
U.S. officials already use DNA tests to confirm that immigrants seeking to join relatives in the United States are related.
Genetic testing led the U.S. State Department to suspend a refugee program in 2008. Suspecting fraud in the family reunification program, officials tested about 3,000 applicants, mainly from Somalia, Ethiopia and Liberia. They confirmed a parental connection in less than 20 percent of the cases.
The program restarted in 2012, requiring a DNA test to prove that a parent and child are related.
New technology could enable those tests to be conducted at the border in as little as 90 minutes. Law enforcement agencies are evaluating rapid DNA tests that can match a person in police custody to a database of known criminals. The same technology could be used to test migrants.
Thermo Fisher Scientific has offered to donate $1 million worth of its rapid test technology to help reunite families separated at the border.
That followed offers from two ancestry companies, 23andMe and MyHeritage, to donate their technologies to the effort.
“Who’s going to keep that information?” asked communications manager Fernanda Durand with the migrant rights group CASA. She is worried the government could use migrants’ genetic fingerprints later without their consent.
“It’s very troubling,” she said.
Standard DNA tests can only reliably identify parent-child and sibling relationships. In refugee situations, advocates say, it’s not unusual for someone other than a child’s biological parent to care for him or her — for example, if a parent has been killed or detained.
The ancestry companies’ tests look at much more genetic information than standard DNA tests and can identify broader relationships; but, they can also generate much more sensitive data, including health information, and that would need to be protected. These tests also are not certified for this purpose by the organization that accredits DNA testing labs.
Plus, “Most of these migrants probably don’t have a high school education and have never encountered DNA in their lives,” noted genetic counselor Kayla Sheets, founder of Vibrant Gene Consulting. “How can they give informed consent [to be tested] if they don’t understand the technology?”
“This is a very, very vulnerable population,” Sheets added, and extra safeguards need to be in place when dealing with their genetic information. “And I’m just not certain that these companies, nor quite frankly the government, [are] quite set up for that yet.”
23andMe and MyHeritage say they are sensitive to the privacy concerns and will offer the tests only to legal aid groups working with migrant families.
Those groups have said, “Thanks, but no thanks,” according to communications director Jennifer Falcon at the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services.
Separating parents from their children is bad enough, she said.