Never miss a story

Get subscribed to our newsletter

Testing people for Covid-19 too early is likely to produce "false negative" results. Wikimedia Commons

Researchers at the US’ Johns Hopkins University have found that testing people for Covid-19 too early is likely to produce “false negative” results, even though they may eventually test positive for the virus.

“A negative test, whether or not a person has symptoms, doesn’t guarantee that they aren’t infected by the virus,” study researcher Lauren Kucirka from JHU said in a paper, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.

“How we respond to and interpret a negative test is very important because we place others at risk when we assume the test is perfect,” Kucirka added.

Follow NewsGram on Quora to get answers to all your questions.

According to the researchers, one of several ways to assess for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection is a method called reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Rapid and early testing suggested false negative results in people. Wikimedia Commons

These tests rapidly make copies of and detect the virus’s genetic material. However, as shown in tests for other viruses such as influenza, if a swab misses collecting cells infected with the virus, or if virus levels are very low early during the infection, some RT-PCR tests can produce negative results.

Since the tests return relatively rapid results, they have been widely used among high-risk populations such as nursing home residents, hospitalised patients and health care workers.

Previous studies have shown or suggested false negatives in these populations.

For the new analysis, the research team reviewed RT-PCR test data from seven prior studies, including two pre-prints and five peer-reviewed articles. The studies covered a combined total of 1,330 respiratory swab samples from a variety of subjects including hospitalised patients and those identified via contact tracing in an outpatient setting.

From this data, the researchers calculated daily false negative rates, and have made their statistical code and data publicly available so results can be updated as more data are published.

The researchers estimated that those tested with SARS-CoV-2 in the four days after infection were 67 per cent more likely to test negative, even if they had the virus.

People tested with SARS-CoV-2 in the four days after infection were 67 per cent more likely to test negative, even if they had the virus. Pixabay

Also Read: PETA Writes to UP Govt Over Ban of Online Trade of Pets

When the average patient began displaying symptoms of the virus, the false-negative rate was 38 per cent. The test performed best eight days after infection but even then had a false negative rate of 20 per cent, meaning one in five people who had the virus had a negative test result.

According to the researchers, ongoing efforts to improve tests and better understand their performance in a variety of contexts will be critical as more people are infected with the virus and more testing is required.

“The sooner people can be accurately tested and isolated from others, the better we can control the spread of the virus,” the authors wrote. (IANS)



A visitor looks at statues of the 'Royal treasures of Abomey kingdom' on display at the Musee du quai Branly in Paris on Sept. 10, 2021, part of 26 artworks set to be restituted to Benin later in the year.

PARIS — In a decision with potential ramifications across European museums, France is displaying 26 looted colonial-era artifacts for one last time before returning them home to Benin.

The wooden anthropomorphic statues, royal thrones and sacred altars were pilfered by the French army in the 19th century from Western Africa.

Keep Reading Show less

Logs cut from virgin Amazon rain forest are placed in a pile, in Brazil's northeastern Amazon region, February 11, 2008.

GENEVA — The battle to stem climate change may be lost as new information indicates the Amazon rain forest is turning from a carbon sink – or area that absorbs CO2 – into a source of carbon dioxide, the World Meteorological Organization warns.

The latest edition of the WMO's Greenhouse Gas Bulletin reports emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide once again broke all records last year.

Keep Reading Show less
Photo by Amy Elting on Unsplash

Let us educate each other that we are all beautiful in our way and don't need to fit in the so-called standards set by our draconian society.

Receiving compliments is something that a majority of us enjoy. Compliments, after all, make us feel good about ourselves. Sometimes compliments intended to be flattering turn out to be a tremendous turn-off, and in some cases, they are insulting. 'Beauty with brains is one of those compliments. So, is 'beauty with brains' a compliment? Without further ado, I would confidently say- NO! It doesn't matter what your gender, colour, or identity is. The answer is clearly a no.

Beauty with a brain suggests that you can only have one of these qualities and that you are an 'exception' if you possess both. "Oh, Wow! You are a beauty with brains" is a phrase that women often hear. This statement is used when a female exhibits characteristics that indicate she is intelligent. People are taken aback if they see a wise and beautiful woman because women are stereotyped to be either beautiful or brainy. The concern with this is that it is naturally assumed that men are intelligent. Women, on the other hand, are supposed to have a natural beauty. If she isn't attractive according to the norms laid down by society, it is expected that she would at the very least be intelligent. When someone manages to be both, it is regarded as a significant accomplishment.

Keep reading... Show less