Friday September 21, 2018
Home Politics Despite 18th ...

Despite 18th Amendment, Centre Continues to Infringe upon Provincial Matters in Balochistan, says a National Party Leader

The nation cannot possess actual democracy till the commoners from the level of grass-roots reach the parliament- stated Dr. Abdul Malik Baloch on Tuesday

0
//
146
provincial matters
Dr. Abdul Malik Baloch. Wikimedia commons
Republish
Reprint

Pakistan, October 19, 2016: The nation cannot possess actual democracy till the commoners from the level of grass-roots reach the parliament- stated the former Chief Minister of Balochistan and the leader of the ‘National Party’ or NP, Dr. Abdul Malik Baloch on Tuesday. He also said that post the 18th Constitutional Amendment Passage, the Centre kept on encroaching upon the provincial matters.

While addressing Meet the Press Program of the Hyderabad Press Club and the HCBA or High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad chapter- he stated that the 18th amendment is not really being accomplished and implemented with a strong spirit, mentioned the Dawn report.

All properties and natural resources should be owned by the Federating units wherever those are located. He said that provincial governments must own Gwadar and the ports of Karachi.

He further added, the National Party backed the cause of the Economic Corridor of Pakistan and China, but insisted the Federal Government to relinquish control over the ports and hand them over to the provinces. It is actually the municipal authority that possesses the control over the ports around the globe, he mentioned to Dawn.

He added that the city of Gwadar must have the fare share of the revenues acquired from the ports besides the federal governments and Balochistan.

NewsGram brings to you current foreign news from all over the world.

The Refugee Crisis:

Dr Abdul Malik Baloch said, of all issues in the country the most severe problem that is faced right now is the refugee crisis. He observed that there is an onslaught of the refugees and this issue had created both economic and national problems previously. He added that the federal government must repatriate the refugees immediately. He also claimed to have opposed the census till there are refugees in the country, adding that they stayed in Balochistan under the policy of the state earlier but currently the state’s policy have transformed. He then added that the situation is improving slowly.

Mr. Baloch clarified to the members of the Bar that his disagreeing notes in the meetings of CCI (the council of Common Interests) concerning census, were on records.

Peace in Quetta City:

He further added, “When I took over as chief minister, the law and order situation was at its worst. Roads were not safe for people to travel and cases of kidnapping were rampant and insurgency was also at its peak”. He also claimed to have made a “heavily politicized” police force, an apolitical one.

“Even as chief minister, I didn’t make one single appointment or transfer, while budgetary allocation of Rs10 billion was made for police and Levies so that they could take care of themselves”, the former Chief Minister was quoted as saying to Dawn.

NewsGram brings to you top news around the world today.

Mr. Baloch stated that it would take really long to improve the situations in the country since Balochistan was caught in a game of power. “Elements connected with India or Afghanistan can possibly be involved in Balochistan for their own vested interests,” he said.

provincial matters
City of Quetta. Wikimedia commons

There was an improvement, observed in the sector of Education and presently the provincial commission of the Public Service became “free of corruption”. Who had settled and then left Quetta, have returned and the city is now witnessing gradual development of business activities- he said.

He added further “We talked to insurgents as well and a delegation of senior leaders talked to Brahamdagh Bugti and Khan of Kalat. They are now willing to talk and efforts are still under way to reach some amicable settlement with them [insurgents].”

Check out NewsGram for latest international news updates.

Peace in the Regions:

He said that he would favor a negotiation with the neighboring countries when it comes to the situation in the regions. Iran, Afghanistan, China, and India must be taken on board to possess prosperity and peace, Mr. Baloch stated.

 – prepared by Antara Kumar of NewsGram. Twitter: @ElaanaC

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 NewsGram

Next Story

USA: Everything you want to know about Security Clearance; Find out here!

A security clearance allows a person access to classified national security information or restricted areas.

0
Former CIA Director John O. Brennan speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, March 11, 2014. President Donald Trump revoked Brennan's security clearance Wednesday. VOA
Former CIA Director John O. Brennan speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, March 11, 2014. President Donald Trump revoked Brennan's security clearance Wednesday. VOA

U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday revoked the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan. We take a look at what that means.

What is a security clearance?

A security clearance allows a person access to classified national security information or restricted areas after completion of a background check. The clearance by itself does not guarantee unlimited access. The agency seeking the clearance must determine what specific area of information the person needs to access.

What are the different levels of security clearance?

There are three levels: Confidential, secret and top secret. Security clearances don’t expire. But, top secret clearances are reinvestigated every five years, secret clearances every 10 years and confidential clearances every 15 years.

All federal agencies follow a list of 13 potential justifications for revoking or denying a clearance. VOA
All federal agencies follow a list of 13 potential justifications for revoking or denying a clearance. VOA

Who has security clearances?

According to a Government Accountability Office report released last year, about 4.2 million people had a security clearance as of 2015, they included military personnel, civil servants, and government contractors.

Why does one need a security clearance in retirement?

Retired senior intelligence officials and military officers need their security clearances in case they are called to consult on sensitive issues.

Also Read: Governments Across The World Request Apple for 30,000 Device Information

Can the president revoke a security clearance?

Apparently. But there is no precedent for a president revoking someone’s security clearance. A security clearance is usually revoked by the agency that sought it for an employee or contractor. All federal agencies follow a list of 13 potential justifications for revoking or denying a clearance, which can include criminal acts, lack of allegiance to the United States, behavior or situation that could compromise an individual and security violations. (VOA)