Monday December 10, 2018
Home U.S.A. US President ...

US President Donald Trump Needs to Do Better than Tweeting, to Deal with North Korea

President Trump acquitted China of pressuring North Korea to Make Amends Regarding the Use of Nuclear Missiles

US President Donald Trump. VOA
  • The US planned to use China to pressure the North Korea to make amends regarding the use of the nuclear missile
  • Followed by the death of American Student, Trump acquitted China from the responsibility of pressurizing North Korea to make amends
  • The viable option for the US is if Congress exercises its foreign policies oversight responsibilities by conducting a hearing on the Trump’s North Korea policy

Washington, July 2, 2017:  Since Donald Trump has taken the seat as America’s President, the only threat to America is North Korea which has threatened to launch a fully fledged nuclear war. The report is based on the views presented to by Gregory J. Wallance, who is a writer, lawyer, former federal prosecutor, serving as assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York from 1979 to 1985.

Many people feel Trump did a positive thing by addressing North Korea as a threat. Further, the US has planned to use China to pressure the North Korea to make amends regarding the use of nuclear missile because China is North Korea’s major trading partner. In order to reduce trade exports from China to North Korea, US has promised China with better trading terms.

On June 21, 2017, Trump tweeted, “While I greatly appreciate the efforts of President Xi & China to help with North Korea, it has not worked out. At least I know China tried!” as a result of the death of an American college student who was jailed in North Korea who returned to the US in a coma.

ALSO READ: Indian-Americans Role in US Government is “profound”, have Contributed Immensely to Art and Culture, says US lawmaker

Soon after his tweet, he acquitted China from the responsibility of pressurizing North Korea to make amends which was taken by China in the best possible way. Now, Chinese President Xi Jinping was already unwilling to put pressure on North Korea can say that they tried their best.

Now the US is left with only two options: First is to launch a strike towards North Korea’s missile installations and face retaliation by North Korea resulting in a lot of deaths and the second is likely to wait till the time North Korea developing intercontinental ballistic missiles and that would give them the edge.

So, the viable option for the US is if Congress exercises its foreign policies oversight responsibilities by conducting a hearing on the Donald Trump’s North Korea policy.

A similar model was enacted in 1966 regarding Senate foreign relations committee’s hearings on Vietnam. It was done because, despite the late former President Lyndon B. Johnson’s assessments towards the Vietnam War, they were already losing so many American soldiers.

Conducting hearings like these would require the Trump administration to explain their policy and find better alternatives to actually make China pressurize North Korea and while the 1966 hearings were too late, Donald Trump’s administration still have time to retrace their steps towards the correct path and to make actual policy amendments rather than tweeting about the situation.

– summarised by Sumit Balodi of NewsGram. Twitter: @sumit_balodi

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 NewsGram

Next Story

U.S. Appeals Court Refuses To Enforce Asylum Ban On Immigrants

Asylum, Trump
A migrant family from Central America waits outside the Annunciation House shelter in El Paso, Texas, after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer drops them off. VOA

A divided U.S. appeals court late Friday refused to immediately allow the Trump administration to enforce a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.

The ban is inconsistent with an existing U.S. law and an attempted end-run around Congress, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 2-1 decision.

“Just as we may not, as we are often reminded, ‘legislate from the bench,’ neither may the Executive legislate from the Oval Office,” 9th Circuit Judge Jay Bybee, a nominee of Republican President George W. Bush, wrote for the majority.

Refugees, Migrants, Asylum seekers, Trump
Men line up for dinner outside a shelter housing members of the migrant caravan, in Tijuana, Mexico. VOA

A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, Steven Stafford, did not have comment. But he referred to an earlier statement that called the asylum system broken and said the department looked forward to “continuing to defend the Executive Branch’s legitimate and well-reasoned exercise of its authority to address the crisis at our southern border.”

Trump proclamation

At issue is President Donald Trump’s Nov. 9 proclamation that barred anyone who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border between official ports of entry from seeking asylum. Trump issued the proclamation in response to caravans of migrants approaching the border.

A lower court judge temporarily blocked the ban and later refused to immediately reinstate it. The administration appealed to the 9th Circuit for an immediate stay of Judge Jon Tigar’s Nov. 19 temporary restraining order.

In a dissenting opinion Friday, 9th Circuit Judge Edward Leavy said the administration “adopted legal methods to cope with the current problems rampant at the southern border.” Nothing in the law the majority cited prevented a rule categorically barring eligibility for asylum on the basis of how a person entered the country, Leavy, a nominee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, said.

Refugees, Migrants, Asylum seekers, Trump
Honduran migrant Genesis Belen Mejia Flores, 7, waves an American flag at U.S. border control helicopters flying overhead near the Benito Juarez Sports Center serving as a temporary shelter for Central American migrants, in Tijuana, Mexico. VOA

Federal law is clear

In his Nov, 19 ruling, Tigar sided with legal groups who argued that federal law is clear that immigrants in the U.S. can request asylum regardless of whether they entered legally.

The president “may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden,” the judge said in his order.

Also Read: Refugees’ Entitled To Claim The Right To Asylum in The U.S: U.N.

The ruling led to an unusual public dispute between Trump and Chief Justice John Roberts after Trump dismissed Tigar — an appointee of Trump’s predecessor — as an “Obama judge.”

Roberts responded with a statement that the federal judiciary doesn’t have “Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.” (VOA)