Wednesday November 13, 2019
Home India Find Out Thos...

Find Out Those 28 US Goods on Which India Increases Tariffs Amid Trade Spat

The retaliatory move came days after Washington removed New Delhi from a list of countries that have preferential access to its market

FILE - Containers are piled up at a terminal at the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust in Mumbai, India, June 29, 2017. India’s commerce ministry says it will not try to hold onto its preferential zero-tariffs status with the United States. VOA

India has hiked tariffs on 28 goods imported from the United States as a trade spat between the two countries intensifies. The retaliatory move came days after Washington removed New Delhi from a list of countries that have preferential access to its market.

“India has put its cards on the table,” says trade expert Biswajit Dhar at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. “The U.S. has upped the ante and it is also threatening to take further action. This required India to respond.”

The trade spat has escalated ahead of a visit later this month to New Delhi by U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who has pushed India to allow American companies more access to its markets and to lower barriers.

FILE – A female laborer winnows almonds inside a small-scale factory unit in New Delhi, Jan. 15, 2011. India is by far the largest buyer of U.S. almonds. VOA

Experts fear the growing tensions could cast a shadow over a deepening India-U.S. strategic partnership that aims at countering China’s growing influence.

The American goods that attract higher tariffs beginning Sunday include almonds, apples, walnuts, chickpeas and lentils, as well as some stainless steel products. New Delhi is the largest importer of U.S. almonds and the second largest buyer of apples. The total impact of the Indian tariffs is estimated to be about $240 million.

Increase deferred several times

The hike in duties by New Delhi was announced a year ago in retaliation for Washington’s imposition of higher tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, but deferred several times as both sides held talks to bridge their differences.

But India went ahead after the U.S. earlier this month imposed another punitive measure: removing New Delhi from a trade program to aid the economies of developing countries. Washington said the preferential status was revoked because India has failed to provide adequate access to its markets for U.S. firms. It will impact Indian imports worth $5.6 billion. New Delhi was the largest beneficiary of the Generalized Systems of Preferences program. India’s commerce ministry has called the decision unfortunate.

A shop in New Delhi sells almonds and walnuts, which are among the 29 U.S. products on which India has announced retaliatory tariffs starting August 4. India is the largest market for U.S. almonds. (A. Pasricha/VOA)

US markets

U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly named India as one of the countries that follow trade practices unfair to the United States. Washington wants New Delhi to address a trade imbalance, the $142 billion bilateral trade is skewed in New Delhi’s favor by about $30 billion.

Dhar says among the sticking points are the demands by Washington that India lower tariffs on dairy and poultry to encourage U.S. agricultural imports. But these are areas where New Delhi faces domestic challenges.

“India is battling with this very large population of small and marginal farmers. It is very difficult for India to drop tariffs specially as we know U.S. agricultural products are being subsidized,” according to Dhar.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo addresses the India Ideas Summit in Washington, June 12, 2019. VOA

The United States is also concerned about recent rules that it says adversely impact the operations of its e-commerce companies such as Amazon and Walmart in India. Even though the moves by New Delhi and Washington signal that each is taking a tougher stand, they could also push both sides to more serious negotiations to resolve their differences.

ALSO READ: Trump Announces Migration Deal with Mexico, Averting Threatened Tariffs

“We remain open to dialogue and hope that our friends in India will drop their trade barriers and trust in the competitiveness of their own companies, their own businesses, their own people,” Pompeo said at policy speech at the U.S. India Business Council in Washington on Thursday. He said that countries that have provided American companies access to their markets have seen “real opportunity.”

Pompeo will in New Delhi on June 25-26 to hold talks with his Indian counterpart. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Trump are also expected to meet on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Japan later this month. (VOA)

Next Story

Delhi Has Higher Power Tariffs Than Goa, Arunachal Pradesh, J&K

The Delhi government recently announced that it would not charge any fee on power bills of up to 200 units, following which CM Arvind Kejriwal said that Delhi has the cheapest power tariffs

India, J&K, Power, Sector, Development
The government proposes to unbundle the department to break it into four profit-oriented companies. Pixabay

The Delhi government recently announced that it would not charge any fee on power bills of up to 200 units, following which Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said that Delhi has the cheapest power tariffs in the country.

Although the government is subsidising power bills in the state, a look at tariff rates across the country, however, shows that some other states have lower tariff rates than the national capital.

Data show that power tariffs in Goa, Arunachal Pradesh and the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are lower than Delhi for up to 400 units of consumption, the range generally consumed by most households.

In the national capital, power tariffs as set by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) are: Rs 3 per unit up to consumption of 200 units, and Rs 4.5 per unit for the range of 201-400 units.

This rate has been fixed by the DERC and has remained stagnant for the past three years. But with the subsidy announced this year, the tariff for FY20 has become nil for up to 200 units of consumption.

In Goa, 1-100 units cost at the rate of Rs 1.4 per unit and Rs 2.1 is charged per unit in the range of 101-200 units with an average rate of Rs 1.75 per unit up to 200 units.

In Arunachal Pradesh, people under the ‘below poverty line’ category have to pay Rs 2.65 per unit and in general, tariff is charged at Rs 4 per unit. Further, in the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, power tariff for the range of 1-100 units is Rs 1.54 per unit and Rs 2 per unit for the range of 101-200 units.

The Jammu Kashmir Electricity Regulatory Commission charges Rs 3 per unit for consumption of 201-400 units.

In July this year, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal announced free power for consumers using up to 200 units of electricity per month. He also announced that power consumption between 200 and 400 units would get 50 per cent rebate for the benefit of lower to medium income consumers.

This discount came on the behest of subsidies given by the Delhi government.

Further, the average cost at which distribution companies buy power is also higher in Delhi compared to several other states.

The average cost of power procurement in Delhi is Rs 3.90 per unit. This is even higher than the national average of Rs 3.60 per unit. Discoms in around 21 states and Union Territories buy power at an average price lesser than that in the national capital.

Delhi, India, Power, Tariffs
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal announced free power for consumers using up to 200 units of electricity per month. Wikimedia Commons

This shows that although power is significantly subsidised in Delhi, the discoms in the national capital buy power at higher rates. High cost of power does not provide a conducive situation for subsidies and the exchequer in Delhi would have to bear the financial burden over the recently announced rates.

In the financial year 2019-20, the Delhi government has allocated Rs 1,720 crore (out of Rs 1,790 crore under energy sector) for providing subsidies to consumers through power distribution companies (DISCOMs).

A look at the tariff approved by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission for FY20 shows that electricity charges for the first 200-unit consumption remains static at Rs 3 per unit, for 200-400 units it is same as Rs 4.5 per unit, for 400-800 units its is Rs 6.5 per unit, and the only change this year for domestic consumer is that electricity consumption beyond 1,200 units has been raised from Rs 7.75 per unit to Rs 8 per unit.

With free power, Delhi has notably become the state with cheapest electricity tariff in that category as there is no further scope for cuts. But in this category too, Delhi is not alone as states like Chhattisgarh, Punjab, Bihar and Haryana have provided subsidy from the state budget to keep electricity tariff low despite state regulatory commissions approving higher tariff as part of the efforts to bring the charges closer to the cost and help discoms get over their chronic financial problems.

ALSO READ: Swachh Bharat Mission of Modi Government is an “Example-Setting Programme for World”

Industry experts said that electricity tariffs have to be revised upwards in most states given the rise in coal prices and the general inflation.

“It is most unfortunate that state governments are using low electricity charges as a plan to woo voters. If the charges were low due to the system and operational improvement among discoms, no one would have complained. But the fact remains that discoms in Delhi continue to sit on high regulatory assets while the government decides to subsidise electricity from budget,” said a power sector expert, asking not to be named.

Last year, the Arvind Kejriwal-led government had provisioned Rs 1,815 crore for the energy sector. The move to offer free power has shaken up the power sector. The announcement shatterd the hopes of a shift to market-driven policies easing the pressure on power distribution utilities. Although it provides relief to the common man, such moves may further impact the country’s beleaguered power sector and the subdued overall economy. (IANS)