Sunday November 17, 2019
Home Business Fraud at PMC ...

Fraud at PMC Bank Shows that there is Rot in System and Not the Bank

These audits failed to detect multiple accounts, over 20,000 accounts with the same address and ownership

0
//
Fraud, PMC Bank, System
Yes, there is no need to trigger panic but there is an immediate need to revamp the audit process carried out by RBI and internal auditors of banks. Pixabay

The fraud at Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank shows that there is a rot in the system and not the bank. If unchecked, it can cause irreparable damage to the system. The complicity of bank officials with the Wadhawan family and its companies shows that there is a systemic flaw in the credit system. The extent of it may vary from one bank to another, but its existence is now undeniable.

Addressing a press conference after the Monetary Policy Committee review, Reserve Bank of Indai (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das said that the PMC incident was an isolated one and there was no need to panic. Yes, there is no need to trigger panic but there is an immediate need to revamp the audit process carried out by RBI and internal auditors of banks. These audits failed to detect multiple accounts, over 20,000 accounts with the same address and ownership. This shows a systemic failure. Auditors need to use technology and simple programming languages like Python to sort through large databases to identify risks, especially concentric risks. It also shows that core banking solutions (CBS) a software platform mandated by RBI is prone to manipulations.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman seems to be cognizant of this challenge as she has asked public sector banks to appoint risk assessment officers at higher salaries. Cooperative banks also need risk assessment audit, as they are incapable of hiring such talent. RBI has to appoint these risk assessment auditors so that the extent of the problem in cooperative banks can be gauged and addressed.

There is a culture of hiding risks associated with a borrower at several points in the process of credit approval and disbursement. This has become part of the credit system. If a borrower cannot pay interest on loans, they do not disclose his situation and position as it shows the branch, the branch manager and credit team in a bad light. The managers see it as a personal failure. The bank also takes strict action against staff responsible for approving such loan.

Fraud, PMC Bank, System
Addressing a press conference after the Monetary Policy Committee review, Reserve Bank of Indai (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das said that the PMC incident was an isolated one and there was no need to panic. Pixabay

The system treats default as a failure of the employee more than the borrower. The employee’s failure in judging the capability of the borrower is an individuals failure not because of economic cycles. Therefore, to prevent a borrower from failing, bank employees go to extreme lengths. Renewing loans, giving it to associated companies, ensuring that the interest payments are funded, and even committing fraud with the system. They try to hide it as long as they can, praying and hoping that the borrower will recover and repay.

This is the behaviour of the credit department in all banks. This is corroding the banking system as it’s endemic, barring a few private banks. The system does not know the exact risk it is carrying as nobody wants to acknowledge the borrower’s position till it blows up in the media. There is a conspiracy of silence among bank managers as every disclosure has a ripple effect across branches and banks.

The system needs correction to revamp the credit system, both process reform and behaviour change is required. The behaviour nudge is important versus any aggressive action as the latter will freeze the credit flow in the system already suffering from a slowdown. The asymmetric relationship between the bank manager and the borrower needs correction.

There is too much power with branch managers. Some banks have shifted the process of sanction to a central committee for loans beyond a size. But routing every single loan through a central committee slows down the process of sanction and disbursement. Hence, technology, data and artificial intelligence needs to be used to create solutions for approval and disbursement.

Also Read- More than 1 Million People Participate in Mass Rally against Chilean Government’s Austerity Policies

Decisions need automation in core banking solutions and manual interventions need to be reduced. The process of loan approval begins at the branch level. Due diligence needs to be outsourced. The paperwork, physical verification of assets, valuation of assets, determination of the creditworthiness of the business and individual to pay — these are data collection steps and here biases and corruption affect the outcome. There needs to be competition among branches to do it in the most exhaustive manner. We should see successful completion of this process as an accomplishment whether or not it grants the loan. This is the only way to bring rigour in this process.

The different processes in the system – evaluation, determination of interest rate to be charged and credit rating also need a revamp. There is graft, corruption and malfeasance. Branch managers lobby credit rating agencies for a better credit rating to justify their own evaluation report and offer a cheaper loan to the borrower. In a consortium, bankers blindly followed the evaluation of the largest lender which, if it’s State Bank of India (SBI), the report is copied and pasted by all the other banks. In terms of evaluation, SBI, because of its size, has a better evaluation system than most private sector banks. And if it wants, it can pull data on the past performance of cash flows of the promoters.

If SBI is not involved, the credit evaluation report is poor and prepared after the decision to lend or not is already made. Borrowers can influence lending in both public and private sector banks. Sometimes, to meet targets, branch managers behave like entrepreneurs. All checks and balances in the system are up for subversion if the manager has decided to lend. In the last few years, bankers have become wary of taking decisions that involve risk and do not want to lend either. The pile-up of NPAs and recovery has become the only target for most PSBs. Bankers are in a hurry to send a borrower to the insolvency board. They do not want to restructure for fear of being questioned. The pendulum has swung in the other direction. In a nutshell, the system is in a jam. Therefore, a revamp needs to be done in stages. The objective should not be to punish the bank employees but to change the overall credit culture. (IANS)

Next Story

Social Networking Giant Facebook Sues OnlineNIC for Domain Name Fraud: Report

The lawsuit also references some 20 other domain names that are similar to Facebook and Instagram

0
Corporate, America, Climate Change
FILE - In this April 30, 2019, file photo, Facebook stickers are laid out on a table at F8, Facebook's developer conference in San Jose, Calif. The Boston-based renewable energy developer Longroad Energy announced in May that Facebook is building a… VOA

Facebook has filed a lawsuit against domain name registrar OnlineNIC for registering domain names or web addresses that pretended to be affiliated with the social networking giant.

The domain names like www-facebook-login.com and facebook-mails.com are designed to mislead and confuse the users who believe they’re interacting with Facebook.

“By mentioning our apps and services in the domain names, OnlineNIC and ID Shield intended to make them appear legitimate and confuse people. This activity is known as cybersquatting and OnlineNIC has a history of this behaviour,” Facebook said in a statement on Thursday.

The company has filed a lawsuit in California against the state-based OnlineNIC and its proxy service ID Shield.

“We don’t want people to be deceived, so we track and take action against suspicious and misleading domains, including those registered using privacy/proxy services that allow owners to hide their identity,” said Facebook.

Social Media, Facebook, Authenticity, Posts
The social media application, Facebook is displayed on Apple’s App Store, July 30, 2019. VOA

There are tens of millions of domain names on the web that have been registered using these privacy/proxy services.

“We proactively report instances of abuse to domain name registrars and privacy/proxy services and often collaborate with them to take down these malicious domains,” it added.

Also Read: Instagram Shutting Down an App Called ‘Like Patrol’

In many instances, however, domain name registrars and privacy/proxy services will not investigate or respond to abuse reports, which enables bad actors and delays our efforts to fight fraud and abuse.

“This was the case with OnlineNIC and ID Shield,” said Facebook.

The lawsuit also references some 20 other domain names that are similar to Facebook and Instagram. (IANS)