Friday November 15, 2019

Here is why no-one offers helping hand in India if you meet with an accident

In a 2013 survey, the SaveLIFE foundation found that around 74% of Indians were unlikely to help an accident victim, whether alone or with other bystanders

3
//
A car accident in Rabindra Sadan Area, Kolkata. Image source: Wikipedia
  • Supreme Court named road accidents a ‘National Emergency’
  • Onlookers are hesitant to help victims due to fear of wrongful police custody of hefty medical fees
  • SaveLIFE, founded by Piyush Tewari, is a pioneering organisation to address the issue of road rage

In a country with the world’s most densely populated roads and notorious rash driving, road accidents are not too uncommon. In conditions like these, it falls upon pedestrians and bystanders to help the victims of road accidents with utter promptness and empathy.

Even as people bleed to death on the roads crying desperately for help, onlookers show sheer apathy in not helping them. In some cases, they gather around and then continue looking, but that does not help any better. When interviewed, the foremost reason most of these people mention is that they don’t want to involve themselves in unwanted criminal cases. The policemen more, more often than not, assume people help road victims out of guilt. Apart from this, there are concerns that they may be trapped as potential victims in court cases, or the hospital may force them to pay hefty medical fees to save the victim.

Follow NewsGram on Facebook: NewsGram.com

Road rage is becoming a growing worriment in India, especially with a fast growing population and cut throat traffic on the streets.

  • 1 million lives have been lost on roads in India in the past decade
  • 20 children lose their lives everyday, thanks to road accidents
  • 15 people are killed every day owing to road accidents in India
  • 5 million people have been seriously injured in the last decade
  • 3 percent of its annual GDP is lost by India on road accidents
road accidents
SLF model for SaveLIFE

SaveLIFE foundation is a powerful non-governmental organization committed to improving road safety and emergency care services across India. Piyush Tewari, a social activist who founded this organization, was deeply moved by his 17 year old cousin’s death 10 years ago. An immense research commenced following this incident, which finally ended up in the setup of SaveLIFE.

Follow NewsGram on Twitter: @newsgram1

In a 2013 survey, the foundation found that around 74% of Indians were unlikely to help an accident victim, whether alone or with other bystanders. This number is staggeringly high, and to encourage people to begin reaching out to authorities in road cases, The Supreme Court was approached. In 2013, The Supreme Court labeled road rage as a ‘National Emergency’.

Today, these bystanders, who want to help the victims of road accidents but are reluctant to do so on grounds of undue involvement, have legal protection from the Supreme Court. A few guidelines were issued such as:

  • allowing those who call for emergency services about a road crash to retain anonymity
  • forbidding hospitals from demanding payment from an onlooker who takes an injured person to hospital
  • providing them with protection from criminal liability

Piyush Tewari’s actions have helped lots of road rage cases, but like the apex court said, this is indeed a National Emergency, and until we start targeting the general mentalities of people towards social help, little can be changed through legal help.

-by Saurabh Bodas, an intern at NewsGram. Twitter: @saurabhbodas96

READ ALSO: 

  • devika todi

    i have heard of many such accidents myself, where the onlookers do nothing to help. when an accident occurs, the first few hours are critical. help should be provided by all. it can lead to the difference between life and death.

  • Vrushali Mahajan

    This happens because the onlookers are then troubled by the police later while investigating

  • Jagpreet Kaur Sandhu

    However, it is first duty to help someone in need. Spread awareness for kindness sake!

SHARE
  • devika todi

    i have heard of many such accidents myself, where the onlookers do nothing to help. when an accident occurs, the first few hours are critical. help should be provided by all. it can lead to the difference between life and death.

  • Vrushali Mahajan

    This happens because the onlookers are then troubled by the police later while investigating

  • Jagpreet Kaur Sandhu

    However, it is first duty to help someone in need. Spread awareness for kindness sake!

Next Story

India Second to US in Demanding Facebook User Data, Requests Up by 37%

Globally, in the first half of 2019, government requests for user data increased by 16 per cent from 110,634 to 128,617

0
India, US, Facebook
The US government sent Facebook total 50,741 requests about users' data in the same period. Pixabay

The Indian government was second to the US in requesting Facebook for access to users’ data in the first six months of this year — an increase of nearly 37 per cent from the second half (July-December period) last year.India

The Indian government sent Facebook 22,684 queries about users in the above mentioned period and the social networking giant provided data in 54 per cent of the request, according to Facebook’s Transparency Report.

The US government sent Facebook total 50,741 requests about users’ data in the same period.

Globally, in the first half of 2019, government requests for user data increased by 16 per cent from 110,634 to 128,617.

India, US, Facebook
The Indian government sent Facebook 22,684 queries about users in the above mentioned period and the social networking giant provided data in 54 per cent of the request, according to Facebook’s Transparency Report. Pixabay

“Of the total volume, the US continues to submit the largest number of requests, followed by India, the UK, Germany and France,” said Chris Sonderby, VP & Deputy General Counsel, said in a statement on Thursday.

In the US, Facebook received 50,741 requests, representing an increase of 23 per cent more requests than last half, which is consistent with trends over time.

“We always scrutinise every government request we receive for account data to make sure it is legally valid. This is true no matter which government makes the request.

“If a request appears to be deficient or overly broad, we push back, and will fight in court, if necessary. We do not provide governments with a back doors’ to people’s information,” said Sonderby.

Also Read- Apple Releases Second Developer Beta of MacOS Catalina 10.15.2

During the reporting period, the volume of content restrictions based on local law decreased globally by 50 per cent from 35,972 to 17,807.

“This decrease follows an unusual spike last half in which we restricted 16,600 items in India based on a Delhi High Court order. Of the total volume, 58 per cent of restrictions originated from Pakistan and Mexico,” said Facebook.

The company also identified 67 disruptions of Facebook services in 15 countries, compared to 53 disruptions in nine countries in the second half of 2018.

“During this reporting period, we took down 3,234,393 pieces of content based on 568,836 copyright reports, 255,222 pieces of content based on 96,501 trademark reports and 821,727 pieces of content based on 101,582 counterfeit reports,” informed Facebook. (IANS)