Never miss a story

Get subscribed to our newsletter


×

By Nithin Sridhar

After successfully trashing the Modi government over Dadri lynching issue, it appears that the media have now found a new scapegoat- Union Minister General VK Singh.


The recent controversy over the remarks made by VK Singh is a case in point. The former General on Thursday tried to drive home a point that the Union government cannot be held accountable for every local or state level issue including those related to law and order. But, if one were to believe the mainstream media, he equated the Dalits with the dogs.

If one were to simply listen to what exactly Singh said one would know that there was neither denigration nor any insult heaped on the Dalit people. Singh explicitly stated that, the local issues should not be connected with the government and that the issue of Dalit killing was being investigated. He added that, just as the government cannot be blamed for a person stoning a dog in the street, every local issue should not be blamed on the government.

But, the mainstream media jumped on the issue immediately and using VK Singh as the scapegoat branded the entire Modi government as being anti-Dalit.

Just a day before this, the media had the Union government as being anti-North Indians. The scapegoat used was another Union Minister Kiran Rijiju. Speaking at a function, Kiran Rijiju quoted a former Lt. Governor of Delhi as saying people in north India enjoy breaking rules. He was clearly making a simple observation regarding the rising condition of law and order and people’s attitude towards the same.

Yet, the media used it to portray the Modi government as being divisive. Commenting on the issue, Arvind Kejriwal tweeted:

And this tweet was quoted extensively by all mainstream media houses to establish how the Union government is dividing the country along regional and religious lines. One is left wondering, how did the issue of Hindu-Muslim divide even come into the picture? Similarly, during the Dadri lynching issue, though the issue was clearly a law and order issue, which is a responsibility of the state government, the media successfully managed to put the spotlight on the central government, thanks to some senseless comments by some BJP leaders themselves. If anything, the BJP leaders can be accused for their foot in the mouth syndrome, despite of knowing how mainstream media are quite vocal about its anti-Modi, anti-BJP, and anti-Union government stand. But, that does not make PM Modi or his government divisive or hostile to certain communities. The media has repeatedly adopted its tactic of first blowing a trivial issue out of proportion and then twisting it to misguide public and portray the Union government as being anti-Dalit, anti-minority, and as against any idea of united, safe, and secure India. Worse still is the narrative that the media is carrying out, especially around sensitive issues like those of Dadri lynching that makes one wonder whether the media is a watchdog of democracy or is it promoting an agenda to bring down the Modi government by causing nationwide unrest? This is not an assessment of just this writer. Hundreds of people across the country have recognized this trend which they have expressed through the hashtag #MediaWantsRiots on Twitter. Madhu Kishwar, an Indian academic and writer expresses similar sentiments in her tweets:

Let there be no mistake, the media is not being criticized for its genuine criticism of the working of the government. It is being criticized for ignoring the real issues and giving unnecessary coverage to the trivial one’s with a clear biasness in its commentary. Senior journalist Surajit Dasgupta rightly asks in his tweet:

But, the media continues to ignore all criticisms of biasness against its reportage. The criticizers have been branded as ‘pseudo-patriots’ and ‘bhakts’. It is high time to start asking the difficult questions: Is media really running anti-India agenda? Is the media abetting breaking India forces? If yes, then who is the mastermind behind this anti-government propaganda?

Thankfully, at least one public intellectual has started asking these questions.

(Photo: http://consciouslyenlightened.com)


Popular

Unsplash

Feminism itself is nothing but a simple movement that pursues equal rights for women (including transwomen) and against misogyny both external and internal.

"In India, to be born as a man is a crime, to question a woman is an atrocious crime, and this all because of those women who keep suppressing men in the name of feminism."

Feminism, a worldwide movement that started to establish, define and defend equal rights for women in all sections- economically, politically, and socially. India, being a patriarchal society gives a gender advantage to the men in the society thus, Indian feminists sought to fight against the culture-specific issue for women in India. Feminism itself is nothing but a simple movement that pursues equal rights for women (including transwomen) and against misogyny both external and internal. It states nowhere that women should get more wages than men, that women deserve more respect than men, that's pseudo-feminism.

Keep Reading Show less
wikimedia commons

Yakshi statue by Kanayi Kunjiraman at Malampuzha garden, Kerala

Kerala is a land of many good things. It has an abundance of nature, culture, art, and food. It is also a place of legend and myth, and is known for its popular folklore, the legend of Yakshi. This is not a popular tale outside the state, but it is common knowledge for travellers, especially those who fare through forests at night.

The legend of the yakshi is believed to be India's equivalent of the Romanian Dracula, except of course, the Yakshi is a female. Many Malayalis believe that the Yakshi wears a white saree and had long hair. She has a particular fragrance, which is believed to be the fragrance of the Indian devil-tree flowers. She seduces travellers with her beauty, and kills them brutally.

Keep Reading Show less
Pinterest

Ancient India not only made mentions of homosexuality but accepted it as well.


The LGBTQ+ acronym stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and others. In India LGBTQ+ community also include a specific social group, part religious cult, and part caste: the Hijras. They are culturally defined either as "neither men nor women" or as men who become women by adopting women's dress and behavior. Section 377 of the India Penal code that criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature" i.e. engaging in oral sex or anal sex along with other homosexual activities were against the law, ripping homosexual people off of their basic human rights. Thus, the Indian Supreme Court ruled a portion of Section 377 unconstitutional on 6th September 2018.

Keep reading... Show less