Monday November 18, 2019

Marxist Humanist John Peter Berger breathes his last at the age of 90 in Paris

John Berger was an art critic, novelist, painter and poet.

John Berger, Wikimedia

New Delhi, Jan 3, 2017: John Peter Berger, a fabled English art critic breathed his last at the age of 90. He passed away at his home in the Paris suburb of Antony on Monday. His health was in a weak state since a year.

NewsGram brings to you current foreign news from all over the world.

Berger lived in France for the most parts of his life. He had moved to France in 1962 due to his distaste for life in Britain. His career as a painter started when he displayed his art pieces in the art galleries of London in the late 1940s. His novel, “G” won him the Booker Prize in 1972, mentioned PTI.

NewsGram brings to you top news around the world today.

Berger also served in the British Army from 1944-46. He was also counted as an eminent Marxist Humanist. John Berger entered the publishing world with his first novel, A Painter of Our Time which was published in 1958.

His BBC broadcasted TV series, “Ways of Seeing” brought a political view to art criticism. Scottish author Ali Smith deemed Berger as “one of the world’s most vital corresponders”.

– by Shambhavi Sinha of NewsGram. Twitter:  @shambhavispeaks

Next Story

Aadhaar Helpline Mystery: French Security Expert Tweets of doing a Full Disclosure Tomorrow about Code of the Google SetUP Wizard App

cryptocurrency. google
Google comes up with a new feature

Google’s admission that it had in 2014 inadvertently coded the 112 distress number and the UIDAI helpline number into its setup wizard for Android devices triggered another controversy on Saturday as India’s telecom regulator had only recommended the use of 112 as an emergency number in April 2015.

After a large section of smartphone users in India saw a toll-free helpline number of UIDAI saved in their phone-books by default, Google issued a statement, saying its “internal review revealed that in 2014, the then UIDAI helpline number and the 112 distress helpline number were inadvertently coded into the SetUp wizard of the Android release given to OEMs for use in India and has remained there since”.

Aadhaar Helpline Number Mystery: French security expert tweets of doing a full disclosure tomorrow about Code of the Google SetUP Wizard App, Image: Wikimedia Commons.

However, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) recommended only in April 2015 that the number 112 be adopted as the single emergency number for the country.

According to Google, “since the numbers get listed on a user’s contact list, these get  transferred accordingly to the contacts on any new device”.

Google was yet to comment on the new development.

Meanwhile, French security expert that goes by the name of Elliot Alderson and has been at the core of the entire Aadhaar controversy, tweeted on Saturday: “I just found something interesting. I will probably do full disclosure tomorrow”.

“I’m digging into the code of the @Google SetupWizard app and I found that”.

“As far as I can see this object is not used in the current code, so there is no implications. This is just a poor coding practice in term of security,” he further tweeted.

On Friday, both the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) as well as the telecom operators washed their hand of the issue.

While the telecom industry denied any role in the strange incident, the UIDAI said that he strange incident, the UIDAI said that some vested interests were trying to create “unwarranted confusion” in the public and clarified that it had not asked any manufacturer or telecom service provider to provide any such facility.

Twitter was abuzz with the new development after a huge uproar due to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Chairman R.S. Sharma’s open Aadhaar challenge to critics and hackers.

Ethical hackers exposed at least 14 personal details of the TRAI Chairman, including mobile numbers, home address, date of birth, PAN number and voter ID among others. (IANS)

Also Read: Why India Is Still Nowhere Near Securing Its Citizens’ Data?