Sunday November 18, 2018
Home India Mystery conti...

Mystery continues to shroud Gumnami Baba

2
//
Republish
Reprint

By NewsGram Staff Writer

Subhas_Chandra_BoseNew Delhi: One of the greatest mysteries which troubles India till date is the death of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. There have been various speculations revolving around it, one of them is Gumnami Baba, the ascetic of UP’s Faizabad, was actually none other than Netaji himself.

Surajit Dasgupta, 64, racked his memory to 33 years ago, and recalling he said: “He was seated before me like everyday when I had an urge to see him. I stole a glance and was so dazzled by the glow that emanated from within that I had to immediately lower my gaze. It is a sight I will never forget.”

Dasgupta was talking about Bhagwanji, an ascetic in Faizabad, and very few were privy that he was none other than Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. The man who was proclaimed dead for past 37 years by some, others believing he still lived. Quite a few people felt that he would one day return to his homeland to prove all the doubting Thomases that he was indeed alive.

“Netaji’s associate and our guru, Sunil Gupta, had been visiting Bhagwanji for two decades. In the initial years, it was very secretive. He wouldn’t disclose where he was going. All that we knew was that he had some very important mission. Later, he cryptically said: ‘Contact has been established’. I knew at once he was referring to Netaji. I was thrilled. In the years that followed, I would accompany Gupta till the station as he took a train twice a year to travel to Neemsar and later Faizabad, once during Durga Puja and again on January 23, Netaji’s birthday. It was much later, in 1982, that Gupta decided it was finally time we could be let into the exclusive circle, and we travelled to Faizabad to meet Bhagwanji,” he reminisced.

Gupta had been ordered by Netaji’s elder brother, Suresh Chandra Bose, to investigate into every news and rumour related to Netaji’s return to India. Following different leads and meeting with dead ends, Gupta finally met Bhagwanji at Neemsar in 1962.

Dasgupta talked about some rules to be followed if you wished to pay a visit to Bhagwanji, one of them was that you were not allowed to look at his face. There was generally a short curtain drawn between him and the visitors that hid his face.

Dasgupta said: “We would go to his house every day, have breakfast and then go to shop for the day’s meals. While Saraswati Devi would cook, we would discuss world politics. After lunch, it could be about theology, music, even metaphysics. Sometimes, the discussions went on till the wee hours next morning. We would sit transfixed, listen with rapt attention and take notes. He predicted the disintegration of USSR that was unthinkable then, talked about the mess in the Vietnam War. He even remarked that communism would die in the place of its birth. During the Bangladesh Liberation War, he followed the developments keenly and we believe he even passed on strategic instructions that helped decide the war.”

After the initial visits, Bhagwanji started trusted the youth enough to not look at him and so stopped drawing the curtain, Dasgupta recalls. It is at one of those occasions that Dasgupta couldn’t resist a peek and he was astonished! “There was no mistake in identification that he was Netaji. His hair had thinned, much more than what we were used to seeing in his photographs. He had a flowing beard. But the features were exactly the same. Only, he had aged. The eyes were so powerful I had to turn away immediately. I realized then that the patriot our parents and we had worshipped since we were kids had reached a higher plane of existence. He had become a mahatma,” he said.

Netaji_Subhas_Chandra_Bose_and_Members_of_the_Azad_Hind_Fauj

Rita Banerjee of Faizabad, who Bhagwanji called as “Phoolwa Rani” and her husband as “Bachha”, talked about a “bright light” emanating from him. “The aura was so intense that I could not establish eye-contact with him.” Gyaani Gurjeet Singh Khalsa, the chief priest of Gurudwara Brahmakund Sahib overlooking the raging Saryu river, recounts a similar experience when he met Bhagwanji face-to-face. “I was a 17-year-old when I saw him. The radiance on his face was astounding. It cannot be explained in words,” he said.

Some of the people, including Dasgupta, who believed that Bhagwanji was indeed none other than Netaji, are fighting a silent legal battle with the Indian government to unveil the truth and destroy the lie (as they claim it to be) that is being propagated since past seven decades. In his later years, Bhagwanji related about his escape to USSR via Diren in Manchuria after the “concocted air crash” and also about how prison camps worked in Syria.

Bijoy Nag, 76, a former auditor at a private firm, also recalls a meeting with Bhagwanji with brilliant accuracy, “On my first visit, I touched his feet while he remained behind a curtain. Blessing me, he said: ‘Your dream is now a reality’. I was 31 and thrilled.” Nag met Bhagwanji 14 times between 1970 and 1985, and says each meeting was memorable.

Nag met Bhagwanji at Brahma Kund (Ayodhya), where he had stayed for a few months between 1975 and 1976. “I stayed in the room next to his. I could have looked at him any time if I wished because by then, the curtain had been drawn. He had only instructed us not to look at him and we didn’t disobey him,” says Nag, who had on Bhagwanji’s request collected and delivered photographs of Netaji’s mother, father and school teacher.

“Though I didn’t look at him, I don’t have an iota of doubt that it was Netaji speaking to me. It is an unshakeable truth,” he added. UP CMs Sampurnanand and Benarasi Dasgupta remained in contact with Netaji from December 1954 to April 1957. Their letters, including those from former railway minister Ghani Khan Chowdhury and other important leaders, were found among Bhagwanji’s belonging which are now in possession of the Faizabad Treasury.

The piece is sourced from TOI sources

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 NewsGram

  • asit guin

    Declassification of all Netaji files may prove that JAP AND BRIT JOINTLY PLAYED A FOUL GAME WITH NET@JI; In WW-I, J@pan was a Briti$ ally. Before WW-II, Jap-US trade war and political war started; this led to actual US-JAP war. So Briti$ became an enemy to J@pan by diplomatic manipulation as US-Briti$ alliance was there. After WW-II, J@pan revived their old link with Briti$. Jap and Brit spies were well linked before WW-II. JAP SPIES AGREED TO ELIMINATE NET@JI. Motive was to appease Brit and purchase security for Jap royal family. So, J@PAN HANDED OVER NET@JI TO BRITI$ AND BRITI$ EXECUTED HIM IN SECRETE. False news of air crash was Jap fabrication. In any controversial case, liar is to be suspected. Net@ji plan to start second independence war with USSR help was known to J@pan. So, Brit and Jap spies developed a common minimum program against pro-SOCIALIST agenda of Net@ji. Why should Jap imperialism agree to patronize emergence of independent India as a permanent communist ally? Is it not more logical to fulfill Briti$ condition and purchase favor? Why Jap royal family was not tried as a war criminal? What is the mystery behind this favor?
    There is another point about gumnami baba. Who was he? He was a dummy created as a part of common minimum program of Jap and Brit imperialism. In axis camp, creation of dummy by plastic surgery was a common practice. Hitler and Mussolini were having number of dummies. J@pan sold Net@ji-dummy to Briti$. Briti$ deputed this dummy at faizabad of UP, with a purpose to create confusion regarding Net@ji. This confusion prevented nation to be doubtful about role of Jap or Brit. So, gumnami baba of faizabad is a common creation of Jap and Brit spies. Never had he told truth. If he had told anything, that must be lie. In a controversial case, liar is to be suspected. So, J@PAN SOLD NET@JI TO BRITI$ AND BRITI$ EXECUTED HIM IN SECRET. J@pan sold Net@ji-dummy to Briti$ and Briti$ deputed him at faizabad of UP. J@PAN SURRENDERED TO US-UK SIDE ON 15-AUG-1945. Net@ji’s last flight was on 18-aug-1945. A SURRENDERED J@PAN WAS NO LONGER AN ALLY OF AZAD HIND. They worked as per their new mentors, the Briti$.

  • asit guin

    British documents
    show that during last days of WW II, Viceroy Wavell did not want Netaji brought
    to India as a prisoner. British preferred for dealing with him ‘on the spot’.
    Bose was stimulating a post-war upsurge against British. He thought that India’s
    partition was inevitable if British were allowed to “transfer power”.
    Bose’s aim in 1945 was not just to escape the British pursuit. He had
    foreknowledge of Japan’s decision to surrender. In the spring of 1945, he
    wanted to lead a challenge against the forces of Allies. He wanted to court
    death in battle. He thought that, after Aung San of Burma switched over to
    British side at the last moment, the INA needed to set an example of patriotic
    bravery. He was dissuaded from this course because two divisions of the INA
    were still intact and he thought of a new role for this patriotic force in the
    postwar situation. Unlike other leaders of the Japan-occupied Southeast Asian
    countries, he, at one stage, thought of staying with INA troops in Singapore to
    await the arrival of the Mountbatten-led British Indian occupation force. This
    course was abandoned on August 14, 1945, on the advice of members of AH govt.
    On Aug 14, 1945, some information was brought to him from Thailand. This
    information led him to abandon the plan that INA should await the capture of
    Singapore by the British. There is no record of the information that caused the
    AH govt to ask Netaji to fly to Tokyo for final consultations with Jap govt.
    Netaji had been forewarned of British preference for dealing with him “on
    the spot”? Did he fear that he would not be taken to India as a prisoner? He
    knew of the existence of the Allies’ spies in INA and behind the Japanese
    lines. As the war drew to a close, important people changed sides. They acted
    on the Allies’ directives. Even in Japan there were people who wanted to please
    the victors. They were ready to pay price new masters demanded. The British Foreign
    Office had ordered the assassination of Netaji in 1941, just after he made his
    “grand escape”. But his decision to change route and reach Germany
    via Russia had scuttled their plan. Eunan O’Halpin of Trinity College, Dublin,
    made this claim at Netaji Research Bureau. O’Halpin said the British Special
    Operation Executive (SOE) (formed in 1940 to carry out sabotage activities)
    informed its representatives in Istanbul and Cairo that Bose was thought to be
    travelling from Afghanistan to Germany via Iran, Iraq and Turkey. They were
    asked to arrange his assassination. O’Halpin handed over relevant documents to
    Krishna Bose. On June 13, 1941, the
    British SOE confirmed to Istanbul that the assassination order still stood.
    After Japan surrendered, again scope came for British to utilize Japan against
    Netaji. So, British must have utilized this new opportunity and assassinated him
    in secret.

SHARE
  • asit guin

    Declassification of all Netaji files may prove that JAP AND BRIT JOINTLY PLAYED A FOUL GAME WITH NET@JI; In WW-I, J@pan was a Briti$ ally. Before WW-II, Jap-US trade war and political war started; this led to actual US-JAP war. So Briti$ became an enemy to J@pan by diplomatic manipulation as US-Briti$ alliance was there. After WW-II, J@pan revived their old link with Briti$. Jap and Brit spies were well linked before WW-II. JAP SPIES AGREED TO ELIMINATE NET@JI. Motive was to appease Brit and purchase security for Jap royal family. So, J@PAN HANDED OVER NET@JI TO BRITI$ AND BRITI$ EXECUTED HIM IN SECRETE. False news of air crash was Jap fabrication. In any controversial case, liar is to be suspected. Net@ji plan to start second independence war with USSR help was known to J@pan. So, Brit and Jap spies developed a common minimum program against pro-SOCIALIST agenda of Net@ji. Why should Jap imperialism agree to patronize emergence of independent India as a permanent communist ally? Is it not more logical to fulfill Briti$ condition and purchase favor? Why Jap royal family was not tried as a war criminal? What is the mystery behind this favor?
    There is another point about gumnami baba. Who was he? He was a dummy created as a part of common minimum program of Jap and Brit imperialism. In axis camp, creation of dummy by plastic surgery was a common practice. Hitler and Mussolini were having number of dummies. J@pan sold Net@ji-dummy to Briti$. Briti$ deputed this dummy at faizabad of UP, with a purpose to create confusion regarding Net@ji. This confusion prevented nation to be doubtful about role of Jap or Brit. So, gumnami baba of faizabad is a common creation of Jap and Brit spies. Never had he told truth. If he had told anything, that must be lie. In a controversial case, liar is to be suspected. So, J@PAN SOLD NET@JI TO BRITI$ AND BRITI$ EXECUTED HIM IN SECRET. J@pan sold Net@ji-dummy to Briti$ and Briti$ deputed him at faizabad of UP. J@PAN SURRENDERED TO US-UK SIDE ON 15-AUG-1945. Net@ji’s last flight was on 18-aug-1945. A SURRENDERED J@PAN WAS NO LONGER AN ALLY OF AZAD HIND. They worked as per their new mentors, the Briti$.

  • asit guin

    British documents
    show that during last days of WW II, Viceroy Wavell did not want Netaji brought
    to India as a prisoner. British preferred for dealing with him ‘on the spot’.
    Bose was stimulating a post-war upsurge against British. He thought that India’s
    partition was inevitable if British were allowed to “transfer power”.
    Bose’s aim in 1945 was not just to escape the British pursuit. He had
    foreknowledge of Japan’s decision to surrender. In the spring of 1945, he
    wanted to lead a challenge against the forces of Allies. He wanted to court
    death in battle. He thought that, after Aung San of Burma switched over to
    British side at the last moment, the INA needed to set an example of patriotic
    bravery. He was dissuaded from this course because two divisions of the INA
    were still intact and he thought of a new role for this patriotic force in the
    postwar situation. Unlike other leaders of the Japan-occupied Southeast Asian
    countries, he, at one stage, thought of staying with INA troops in Singapore to
    await the arrival of the Mountbatten-led British Indian occupation force. This
    course was abandoned on August 14, 1945, on the advice of members of AH govt.
    On Aug 14, 1945, some information was brought to him from Thailand. This
    information led him to abandon the plan that INA should await the capture of
    Singapore by the British. There is no record of the information that caused the
    AH govt to ask Netaji to fly to Tokyo for final consultations with Jap govt.
    Netaji had been forewarned of British preference for dealing with him “on
    the spot”? Did he fear that he would not be taken to India as a prisoner? He
    knew of the existence of the Allies’ spies in INA and behind the Japanese
    lines. As the war drew to a close, important people changed sides. They acted
    on the Allies’ directives. Even in Japan there were people who wanted to please
    the victors. They were ready to pay price new masters demanded. The British Foreign
    Office had ordered the assassination of Netaji in 1941, just after he made his
    “grand escape”. But his decision to change route and reach Germany
    via Russia had scuttled their plan. Eunan O’Halpin of Trinity College, Dublin,
    made this claim at Netaji Research Bureau. O’Halpin said the British Special
    Operation Executive (SOE) (formed in 1940 to carry out sabotage activities)
    informed its representatives in Istanbul and Cairo that Bose was thought to be
    travelling from Afghanistan to Germany via Iran, Iraq and Turkey. They were
    asked to arrange his assassination. O’Halpin handed over relevant documents to
    Krishna Bose. On June 13, 1941, the
    British SOE confirmed to Istanbul that the assassination order still stood.
    After Japan surrendered, again scope came for British to utilize Japan against
    Netaji. So, British must have utilized this new opportunity and assassinated him
    in secret.

Next Story

Subhas Chandra Bose Didn’t Die in an Air Crash, Suggests French Report

The French government has always been silent on the issue, adding more significance to the findings

0
Subhas Chandra Bose and the mystery around his death
Subhas Chandra Bose with Mahatma Gandhi at the Indian National Congress meeting. Wikimedia
  • Paris based historian, J B P More, through a brief French secret service report came up with a finding that Bose didn’t die in an air crash and was alive in 1947
  • The French government has always been silent on the issue
  • The Indian government, supposedly ended the mystery some time ago, by replying to an RTI query

New Delhi, July 17, 2017: Seventy-two years since the report of the death of Subhas Chandra Bose, but the debate regarding the real timing and cause of his demise continues. Whether the plane crash story holds any ground or not, is still a mystery that is yet to be solved.

Three commissions were appointed by the government of India to resolve the deeply rooted mystery. Among them, The Shah Nawaz Committee (1956) and Khosla Commission (1970) concluded that Bose died in an air crash on August 18, 1945, at Taihoku airport in Japanese-occupied Taipei, whereas, the Mukherjee Commission came to the conclusion that he did not die in an air crash. Although the Government rejected the claims of the Mukherjee Commission, this did not refrain the scholars around the world to get deep into the case to find the truth.

Recently, Paris-based historian, J B P More stumbled upon a brief French secret service report dated December 11, 1947, at the National Archives of France. He came up with a finding that Bose didn’t die in an air crash and was still alive in 1947.

Also read: Personal life of Subhas Chandra Bose generates divisive views

“It is not stated in the document that Subhas Chandra Bose died in the air crash in Taiwan. Instead, it is reported that Bose’s present whereabouts were unknown as late as December 1947, which again implies that the French did not buy the theory that Bose died in the air crash on August 18, 1945,” said More, who teaches at the Institut des Hautes Etudes Economiques et Commerciales, Paris.

“But he escaped from Indochina alive and his whereabouts were unknown as late as December 11, 1947, as reported in the secret document. This implies that he was alive somewhere but not dead in 1947,” More added, quoting the report written for the “Haut Commisariat de France for Indochina” SDECE Indochinese Base BCRI No. 41283 csah Ex No. 616, under the title: “Archival Information on Subhas Chandra Bose.”

After Bose took off from Saigon on his way to Tokyo, the British and the Japanese too declared that Bose died in an air crash, but the French government always remained silent on the issue, though Vietnam/Indochina was a French colony during the 1940s.

Also read: 100 files related to Netaji declassified by PM Modi on his birth anniversary

Scholars have expressed their concern regarding the need for the findings in the report to be taken seriously. “Even though the Mukherjee Commission concluded that Bose didn’t die in an air crash, the government didn’t recognize it. The Centre’s idea to ‘declassify’ secret files on Bose may not help, But findings like this have significance,” said Kingshuk Nag, a noted journalist and author of the book “Netaji: Living Dangerously.”

Only some time ago, The Ministry of Home Affairs, India, supposedly ended the mystery by replying to a Right To Information query filed by Sayak Sen. MHA reportedly said: “After considering the reports of Shahnawaz Committee, Justice GD Khosla Commission and Justice Mukherjee Commission of Enquiry, the Government has come to the conclusion that Netaji has died in plane crash in 1945.”

Now, Paris-based historian J B P More, with his findings, seems to have given a new shape to this enigma.

– prepared by Samiksha Goel of NewsGram. Twitter @goel_samiksha