Thursday November 23, 2017
Home Politics RTI Act: Ever...

RTI Act: Everything about your right to information

1
573

WHEN WAS THE ACT PASSED?

The Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005 was passed by Parliament on 15 June 2005 and came fully into force on 12 October 2005.


WHAT DOES THE ACT ENTAIL?

  • Under this Act, any citizen can request information from a “public authority” or a government body, who are required to reply within 30 days.
  • The information seeker is not required to provide a reason for the information request.
  • The Act also requires every public authority to computerise their records and publicly make available certain categories of information, spreading them as widely as possible without it having being requested.
  • Prior to the Central RTI Act coming in place, only 8 states and 1 Union Territory had right to information laws, which may differ slightly in the provisions:

– Delhi – Right to Information Act 2001
– Assam – Right to Information 2002
– Goa – Right to Information Act 1997
– Jammu and Kashmir – Right to Information Act 2004
– Madhya Pradesh – Jankari Ki Swatantrata Adhiniyam 2002
– Rajasthan – Right to Information Act 2000
– Tamil Nadu – Right to Information Act 1997
– Karnataka – Right to Information Act 2000 (repealed)
– Maharashtra – Right to Information Act 2002 (repealed)

  • However, the new Central RTI Act covers all central government as well as state and local level public authorities, except Jammu & Kashmir, which is not covered by the Central legislation due to its special status. So, every Indian citizen from every Indian state will be able to demand information under the Central RTI Act.
  • A Public Information Officer (PIO) must be appointed by each agency which the RTI Act covers. It is he who caters to the information requests from the applicants. Assistant Public Information Officers (APIOs) receive the RTI requests and appeals and forward them to their respective PIOs.

 

WHAT IS THE NEED FOR THIS ACT?

  • It keeps citizens informed, helps them understand what information can be accessed and how to seek it, and minimizes the time, effort, and money required by the public to access routine information.
  • The Act empowers citizens, helps them keep a vigil on the Government, and makes the Government more accountable to the governed.
  • It promotes transparency on the Government’s working and helps contain corruption, as through demands of information, citizens can expose fraudulent practices by government officials or get the police to act.


WHICH BODIES ARE COVERED UNDER THE RTI ACT?

When making an RTI application, one needs to check which body holds the required information and whether they are covered by the RTI law.

According to Section 2(h) of the Central RTI Act, the bodies covered under the Act are:

  • All the Central, State and local level bodies set up under the Constitution or under any other State or Central statue, including the President, the legislature, the judiciary, and all related Ministries, departments, and agencies fall under the Act.
  • Anybody owned, controlled, or financed directly or indirectly by the Government, including private bodies receiving Government funding fall under the Act. However, most of the State RTI Acts do not cover private bodies.
  • The Central Information Commission (CIC) initially categorised political parties as public authorities, who would thus be answerable to citizens under the RTI Act. However, the Right to Information (Amendment) Bill, passed in December 2013, removed political parties from the scope of the law.
  • Those Central Intelligence and Security agencies specified in the Second Schedule such as the IB, Directorate General of Income tax(Investigation), RAW, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Directorate of Enforcement, Narcotics Control Bureau, Aviation Research Centre, Special Frontier Force, BSF, CRPF, ITBP, CISF, NSG, Assam Rifles, Special Service Bureau, Special Branch (CID), Andaman and Nicobar, The Crime Branch-CID-CB, Dadra, and Nagar Haveli and Special Branch, Lakshadweep Police, etc. are excluded from the provisions of the Act.

The section 24(1) of the Central RTI Act, which excludes some bodies from the RTI law, also allows the Government to keep adding to the list of exempt agencies. So, one must check the section for latest updates before submitting the RTI application.

In case the required information seems to be related to multiple bodies, the applicant must find which agency has the closest connection to the information. Even if the application reaches the wrong body, it is transferred to the body which holds the specific information.

 

WHAT TYPES OF INFORMATION CAN BE AVAILED?

After identifying the specific body which holds the information, one needs to identify the type of information and find out whether it is covered under the RTI Act. The various formats of required information are:

  • Obtaining information in the form of floppies, diskettes, tapes, video tapes, tapes, or any other electronic mode.
  • Obtaining certified copies of documents or records;
  • Inspecting records;
  • Taking notes and extracts;
  • Inspecting public works;
  • Taking samples of material from public works;

The State laws for RTI may differ in the kinds of information the public is allowed to access.

One must be as specific as possible when asking any information from a Public Information Officer. The person needs to see if the search can be limited by date, area or amount, as any vagueness or ambiguity might result in the application being rejected by the PIO.

 

WHAT TYPES OF INFORMATION CANNOT BE AVAILED?

Certain sensitive pieces of information, if disclosed, might create more harm than good to the public interest. So, according to the section 8(1) of the Central RTI Act, some “exemption provisions” have been provided. A proper understanding of these clauses is necessary as they are often abused by officials who want to purposefully keep their actions a secret. The exemptions are:

  • Any information, which if disclosed, may affect the “strategic, scientific or economic” interests of the State, its foreign relations, or lead to incitement of an offense.
  • Any information, the disclosure of which is forbidden by the Court or any tribunal.
  • Any information, the disclosure of which can cause a breach of privilege of the Parliament or the State Legislature.
  • Any information regarding trade secrets, commercial confidence, or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party (unless the particular authority wants to disclose the information for a wider public interest).
  • Any information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship (unless the particular authority specifically wants to disclose the information for a wider public interest).
  • Any foreign Government information received in confidence.
  • Any information, the disclosure of which can put an individual’s safety or liberty at risk, such as ‘whistleblowers,’ or anyone who has provided certain information required for law enforcement.
  • Any information, the disclosure of which can impede investigation, apprehension, or prosecution of offenders.
  • Cabinet papers, including deliberation records of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries, and other officers.
  • Personal information not related to any public activity or interest, which would create an unwarranted invasion of the individual’s privacy.

It however must be known that according to a “Public Interest Override” (see section 8(2) of the Central RTI Act), even if the requested information is covered by an exemption, it must still be disclosed if the public interest in the specific case is greater than the harm in disclosing it.

 

WHAT IS THE APPLICATION PROCEDURE?

  • The information seeker can fill up the RTI application form available here. The following link provides detailed guidelines with screenshots on how to fill up an RTI application through the online portal: https://rtionline.gov.in/um_citizen.pdf
  • The information seeker must send along with the RTI application, a nominal fee of Rs 10 via a demand draft, a bankers cheque or an Indian Postal Order, payable to the Accounts Officer of the public authority.
  • The information seeker may be required to pay a further fee as required for delivering the requested information, which will be intimated to him by the PIO.
  • The time required between the PIO’s reply and the deposit of the further fees is excluded from the allowed time period for information receipt.
  • If the required information is not provided within the expected time period, it must be provided free of charge.
  • In such a case, it is also treated as a refusal, which may be ground for complaint or appeal, according to circumstances.
  • In cases where the Central or State PIO is not appointed or refuses to receive the application for information request, the Central Information Officer (CIC) intervenes and acts upon the complaints.

 

DRAWBACKS:

  • There are major obstacles to implementing the law such as the lack of adequate public awareness, especially in rural areas, lack of a proper system to store and distribute the information, lack of capacity of the PIOs to deal with the requests, bureaucratic mindset and attitude etc.
  • The Act is also applicable specifically to Indian citizens only. So, foreigners, travelers and refugees are not allowed to use the law to get information.

Next Story

Did former Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh take voluntary retirement from service?

0
98

sujatha-singh

By NewsGram Staff Writer

Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government has maintained silence on the issue about the sacking of former Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh five months ago. Without disclosing much details about the matter, the Cabinet Secretariat stated that Singh had sought voluntary retirement from the service.

As reported by ET, the Cabinet Secretariat has not divulged the Cabinet note, file notings and papers related to the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) meeting on January 28, which had decided to replace Singh with S Jaishankar.

“Copies of available file notings/ papers on this matter (related to ACC’s approval) being ‘Cabinet papers’ are exempted from disclosure under Section 8 (1) (i) of the RTI Act,” the Cabinet Secretariat was reported as saying.

An application was filed by RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak, who sought a photocopy of the Cabinet note, file notings, the names of the people who attended the ACC meeting and the minutes of the meeting.

However, as reported by leading English daily, the Cabinet Secretariat did not even divulge who attended the ACC meeting. It only said that Singh had sought voluntary retirement from service, repeating information already available in the public domain.

“External affairs minister had, while approving the voluntary retirement, sought approval of the Prime Minister for curtailment of tenure of Ms Sujatha Singh and suggested appointment of Dr S Jaishankar (IFS:1977) as foreign secretary vice Ms Sujatha Singh,” the Cabinet Secretariat was reported as saying.

Reportedly it further stated that file notings cannot be disclosed as the matter is sub judice in some other cases before Delhi High Court.

Next Story

Need info through RTI, be patient and wait before CIC clears 38,000 pending appeals

0
24

censorship-610101_640

By Newsgram Staff Writer

Getting information through Right to Information or RTI applicantion is not a child’s play. Whether you want to know about the utilisation of funds in any government run projects in your locality or you are eager to seek information from the Prime Minister’s Office, the Supreme Court or the Municipal Corporation, patience is the mantra for you.

The  government disclosed that close to 38,000 second appeals under the Right to Information Act or RTI are pending with the Central Information Commission or CIC in a written reply to Loksabha this year. According to the government data as many as 22,000 appeals were waiting to be heard till August last year.

“The Prime Minister’s Office is among the top public authorities to reject the maximum number of RTI applications received by them during 2013-14’’ states CIC Annual Report.

RTI activists believe that the delay in appointment of a new Chief Information Commissioner, after the former CIC chief Rajiv Mathur retired in August last year can be one of the reason. RTI Act clearly mentions that the applications and first appeals are required to be mandatorily disposed off within 30 days of their receipt. However, no time limit has been prescribed for disposal of second appeals pending with the CIC.