Never miss a story

Get subscribed to our newsletter

Rush at the Temple. Wikimedia commons.

New Delhi, November 8, 2016: The Supreme Court was informed by the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government of Kerala on Monday that it will allow the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala Temple- a decision that effectively changes the state’s position on the concerning issue.

The U-turn made by the Kerala Government appears just months after the filing of the additional affidavit in the Supreme Court on July, which supported the ban on women’s entry into the sacred shrine.

NewsGram brings to you latest new stories in India.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices R Banumathi, Dipak Misra, and Ashok Bhushan stated on Monday, “On being asked as to what is the stand of the state, senior advocate Gupta states that the state intends to place reliance on its original affidavit (2007) and not on additional affidavit…women of any age group should not be debarred from entry into the temple to worship the deity.” The Supreme Court bench said that the next hearing is scheduled to take place on 13th February, 2017.

On 2007, the LDF government was in favor of allowing the women into the temple. But the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) that took over from LDF gave a contrary opinion citing the traditions of the temple.

Senior advocate K K Venugopal, the representative of the Travancore Devaswam Board that manages the Sabarimala temple, stated to the bench that the state government could not afford to alter its decision according to its convenience.

The change in decision comes only days ahead of the beginning of the ‘Makaravillaku’ pilgrimage-season and the 3 months long ‘Mandala’ puja at the temple on 15th November.

Go to NewsGram and check out news related to political current issues.

During the popular festival, nearly 4-crore devotees throng to the holy temple that is dedicated to lord Ayyappa.

Lord Ayyappa. Flickr

The Supreme Court has stated on 11th July that it may refer the concerned issue to a five-judge constitution bench. The issue is the centuries-old tradition of barring the women between 10-50 years of age, from entering the temple.

The apex Court observed the fact that women are conferred rights under the Constitution and it would like to pass a detailed order in case the issue is referred to a constitution bench. The court remarked, “A temple is a public religious place. You cannot refuse entry to a woman who comes there … It violates the rights of women. We understand the seriousness of the issue. Every right needs to be balanced but every balancing has its own limitations…”

The apex Court had earlier raised a question on the ban on the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple, saying that it would test if ‘faith and belief’ could differentiate among people of the same denomination.

Look for latest news from India in NewsGram.

The management of the holy temple, located on the top of a hill in the Western Ghats of Pathanamthitta district, had earlier informed the court that the ban on the entry of the women existed due to their inability to maintain “purity” while menstruating.

prepared by NewsGram team with PTI inputs



Feminism itself is nothing but a simple movement that pursues equal rights for women (including transwomen) and against misogyny both external and internal.

"In India, to be born as a man is a crime, to question a woman is an atrocious crime, and this all because of those women who keep suppressing men in the name of feminism."

Feminism, a worldwide movement that started to establish, define and defend equal rights for women in all sections- economically, politically, and socially. India, being a patriarchal society gives a gender advantage to the men in the society thus, Indian feminists sought to fight against the culture-specific issue for women in India. Feminism itself is nothing but a simple movement that pursues equal rights for women (including transwomen) and against misogyny both external and internal. It states nowhere that women should get more wages than men, that women deserve more respect than men, that's pseudo-feminism.

Keep Reading Show less
wikimedia commons

Yakshi statue by Kanayi Kunjiraman at Malampuzha garden, Kerala

Kerala is a land of many good things. It has an abundance of nature, culture, art, and food. It is also a place of legend and myth, and is known for its popular folklore, the legend of Yakshi. This is not a popular tale outside the state, but it is common knowledge for travellers, especially those who fare through forests at night.

The legend of the yakshi is believed to be India's equivalent of the Romanian Dracula, except of course, the Yakshi is a female. Many Malayalis believe that the Yakshi wears a white saree and had long hair. She has a particular fragrance, which is believed to be the fragrance of the Indian devil-tree flowers. She seduces travellers with her beauty, and kills them brutally.

Keep Reading Show less

Ancient India not only made mentions of homosexuality but accepted it as well.

The LGBTQ+ acronym stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and others. In India LGBTQ+ community also include a specific social group, part religious cult, and part caste: the Hijras. They are culturally defined either as "neither men nor women" or as men who become women by adopting women's dress and behavior. Section 377 of the India Penal code that criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature" i.e. engaging in oral sex or anal sex along with other homosexual activities were against the law, ripping homosexual people off of their basic human rights. Thus, the Indian Supreme Court ruled a portion of Section 377 unconstitutional on 6th September 2018.

Keep reading... Show less