Progressives Who Reviled Charlie Kirk’s Politics Repudiate His Murder

By Brett Wilkins

Tuesday’s assassination of far-right firebrand Charlie Kirk in Utah drew widespread condemnation from many of the same progressive figures who have previously decried his rampant bigotry, dismissal of gun deaths, and promotion of conspiracy theories including the “stolen” 2020 election.

“Political violence has no place in this country. We must condemn this horrifying attack,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said on the social media site X. “My thoughts are with Charlie Kirk and his family.”

Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) said on X that she was sending “sincere condolences to Charlie Kirk’s family.”

“Violence is unacceptable, always,” she added. “Though I disagree with nearly everything he said publicly, I never lose sight of others’ humanity. He was someone’s son. He was someone’s husband. He was a father to two young children. Praying for the [Utah Valley University] community impacted by this horrific act of gun violence.”

Another “Squad” member, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)—whom Kirk wanted to strip of her US citizenship and deport to Somalia—posted that “political violence is absolutely unacceptable and indefensible.”

“Unconscionable acts of violence should have no place in our country,” she added. “Let’s pray for no more lives being lost to gun violence.”

Kirk, the 31-year-old CEO and co-founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point USA, was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University. The assassin’s identity is still not known; The Washington Post reported that “a person of interest is in custody and being interviewed by officials.”

See Also: Madhya Pradesh to tap veteran officials to steer Simhastha 2028 preparations

Kirk’s last words were a characteristically racist attempt to deflect an audience member’s question about US mass shootings—one of which occurred at a Colorado high school on the same day as his assassination.

The irony of Kirk’s murder was not lost on numerous observers, some of whom posted video of him saying in 2023 that “I think it’s worth to have a cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”

Still, even staunch critics of Kirk and his politics in the United States and abroad condemned his murder.

“There is never any place for violence in our politics,” ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “The only way to work out differences in a democracy is to work them out together—peacefully through our political system.”

“The ACLU condemns this horrific act and extends its sympathies to the family of Charlie Kirk,” Romero added.

Scottish lawmaker and former First Minister of Scotland Humza Yousaf said on social media that “I couldn’t have disagreed more with Charlie Kirk on virtually every political issue he debated.”

“But that is the point, he debated,” Yousaf added. “In any society, let alone a democracy, violence can never be justified. I hope God eases the suffering of his wife, children, family, and friends.”

See Also: Rs 183 crore scam: CBI arrests pvt firm’s MD, aide for duping MP Jal Nigam

Civil rights attorney and transgender rights activist Alejandra Caraballo was among those who expressed deep concern over the direction in which the nation is heading.

“We are in a ‘years of lead’ scenario where political violence has become normalized,” she wrote on the social media site Bluesky. “This is not good for anyone and is deeply dangerous. This level of political violence is not compatible with a functioning society.”

“I’m honestly terrified of what the right will use this as justification for,” she said of Kirk’s assassination. “They’re itching to engage in violence against their enemies and this will give them the excuse to do so. This is why political violence is never acceptable. It just descends into uncontrollable chaos and more violence.”

(CommonDreams/NS)

This article is republished from CommonDreams under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Also Read: