Sunday October 22, 2017
Home Politics Bihar electio...

Bihar election results: 5 things a Bihari is scared of now

1
277

Bihar election results are out and as per news reports, Lalu’s RJD is set to get 16 ministers in Nitish Kumar cabinet with possibilities of his daughter, Misa Bharti, nominated as Deputy CM. It is also possible that his two debutant sons will get cabinet berth.

In this situation, a Bihari youth, who has seen the state of affairs in the 90s is scared to death to imagine the same ‘dynasty’ wielding power. This fear is further enhanced by the fact that a quarter of the MLAs is from ‘Yadav’ clan.

This denounces the whole theory of ‘social justice’ which claims Bihar hasn’t voted along the lines of caste, but that minorities are getting a say in governance. Let the Nitish Kumar cabinet be formed and see what kind of representation the minorities, Dalits and others get and if they are actually the disadvantaged ones.

Whatever be the mathematics, a generation of Biharis can’t forget those days that they went through as kids and adults under Lalu Yadav and Rabri Devi rules, aptly named as ‘jungleraj’.

Here are five scary things from the past that none of us wishes to witness again, in any state:

1. Rangbaazi: Despite being at the bottom of crime charts in the nation, Bihar is still struggling hard to shed its synonymity with criminal activities like loots, murders, ransom and indiscriminate firings among various groups of criminals.

It was in the 90s when you could see a biker driving and the rider, sitting in opposite direction, firing from automatic weapons on the car chasing it. That was a common sight and became normal as people learnt to live with it.

2. Corruption: It was none other than Lalu Prasad Yadav who was involved in one of the biggest scams in the nation i.e. the ‘fodder scam’. Bihari pride nosedived due to his apathy to governance and indulgence in scams.

3. Apathy to education: In a deliberate attempt to not allow people to educate themselves, Lalu and Rabri’s whole regime was focussed on destroying the educational infrastructure. I don’t see any other reason for it. Teachers were not paid their salaries for months on go, and the schools lacked basic facilities like roof and blackboards. Thanks to private schools the kids could study in the smaller cities, but the rural Bihar had nowhere to go.

4. Kidnapping industry: The movie Apaharan, aptly depicts the organised kidnapping industry of the state. There was a time in Bihar when getting into ‘kidnapping industry’ was a great idea for a business. A student going to school wasn’t sure of returning to home. Biharis have seen the days when upper-class homes would pay lakhs to see their kids back home, if not the mutilated bodies would be rotting away in drains and rivers.

5. Migration to other states: Unless the law and order of the state improves, the state will have a tough time creating employment opportunities. This will trigger a wave of migration where Biharis will again be forced to work in the paddy fields of Haryana and Punjab.

Next Story

Get ready for that stereotype (again) you Bihari!

0
774

There are several stereotypes that a ‘Bihari’ is associated with. Bihari is not just a geopolitical identity but, let’s accept it, a demeaning, abusive slang reserved for anyone who is doing something uncivilised, idiotic, criminal or just being uncouth in behaviour.

In buses, metro, autos and at shops and colleges in Delhi, I have heard and seen people being abused by being called a ‘Bihari’, even when they were from some other state. I don’t need to substantiate it. One can just go around and do something like using opposite lane or taking a sudden turn in front of a vehicle etc. and wait for their Bihari connection to be established by their behaviour.

The reason was a government-led by Lalu Prasad Yadav (often seen as a joker in politics) and his illiterate wife Rabri Devi that pushed the state to the nadir of everything. No proper schools, no teachers in existing ones, rampant corruption, indiscriminate criminal activity blooming in every part of the state, kidnapping becoming an industry of sorts and blah blah blah.

The ‘blah blah blah’ part was not just three words that hold no significance, rather it is a tired typing when I can go on counting what wretched state my Bihar was in as a leader in all kinds of nefarious criminal activities. It was reflected in popular culture when the typical goondas in South Indian films would be a Bihari.

Anyway, that was a bit of background and the reason I, and lakhs of Biharis like me, came to study and work outside our state. Our work ranges from the being in the top bureaucracy, ministry to selling vegetables and working as helpers in welding shops of Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Maharashtra and scores of places all over India.

We still deliver sabji to the hanging polybags from the third floor of an unorganized colony in Delhi and, we still take pride in the fact that the several key positions in Ministry, bureaucracy is occupied by Bihari people. The thing is Biharis are everywhere and working hard to make a living, anyhow.

One of my colleagues, the other day, remarked, “You guys (Biharis) are so hard working!”

To this I said, “We had no choice but to work hard. We had to grab anything that came our way. We studied in Delhi, prepared for exams as our parents sold land to finance our education; we came and worked in 18-hour tea shops, factories so that our kids could get an education which became illusive and unattainable in our state that prides on Nalanda, Vikramshila, Budhdha, Patanjali, Chankaya, Aryabhatta and Panini.”

We had no alternative in the state which was ruled by Lalu and Rabri. Being an illiterate Chief Minister is not an issue but letting that illiteracy pull a blanket over your eyes and leaving the state to dogs, certainly is.

And now, in a change of events, the synonym of ‘good governance’ or ‘sushashan’, Nitish Kumar is set to form a government in Bihar where RJD (Lalu’s party) is emerging as the single largest party.

RJD is known to be a casteist party, which is vocal about its agenda and asked people, in this election, to vote on the lines of ‘forward vs backward’. What he forgot was, it was his rule that the state’s backward people remained as such and he had to play the same card again.

In the last ten years of BJP-JDU alliance (cut short before 2014 general elections), the state was reviving with stupendous growth rate, leading the nation from the front on the GDP growth charts.

The educated class (and the uneducated) of the state, like us who are studying, working, doing research, selling vegetables or cleaning the drains, had started to talk of the ‘change’.

A change that spoke of a rising middle class that sent its next generation outside the state to study and work and work for its betterment. A change was seen with school buildings coming up, roads being built in villages, private schools reaching out in villages, MNREGS making sure that the worker migration reduced, corruption and crime tanking to all time lows.

People saw a ray of hope in the first five years of BJP-JDU combine and voted them to power, sheerly in the name of development which was apparent. Nation thought Biharis, finally, voted for development. This was once again seen in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections where parties like JDU that parted ways with BJP (party with development agenda in elections) and shook hands with Lalu’s RJD was reduced to single digits (2 seats).

Bihari image was changing for the better. However, today on November 8, 2015, the results of Bihar Assembly Elections are out and RJD appeared to be the single largest party. BJP’s involvement into ‘beef’, ‘cow’ and ‘Hindu-Muslim’ rhetoric (direct or indirectly brought in conversation by the opposition) didn’t work.

Who did the people vote for? What happened to Bihari voters that made RJD, a party vocal about caste politics, the single largest party? What would an educated Bihari respond to when asked why the RJD is wielding power in the state, again? Will caste ever be out of Bihar politics?

An interesting response came from a friend on Facebook when posed with this question: “Dikkat ye hai ki hame ab fir se sar neeche karna hoga. Gadi khareedne se pehle firauti dena hoga. Zameen khareedne se pehle uske daan kosh me daan dena hoga. Aur fir se apne naam me surname ke jagah Kumar lagana hoga.” (The problem is we will have to hang our heads low. Before buying a vehicle, we will have to pay ransom. Before buying property, we will have to fill their (RJD goons) ‘donation box’. And, once again, we will have to use ‘Kumar’ as surname to conceal our (forward caste) identity.)

I hope his words are not prophetic.

Next Story

Bihar polls: Caste etched in heart, ‘silent’ in spelling

0
541
Bihar polls poster war

My name is Ajeet Bharti. However my father has another surname. Similarly, some of my friends have weird surnames like Kumar (the most prevalent in our generation), Sundaram, Ranjan, and Raj etc. Why is that weird? It is weird for they do not project caste, village or lineage as surnames are supposed to do worldwide. None of us have our fathers using such surnames in Bihar from my father’s generation. My father uses Singh, Kumar’s father uses Sahay, Sundaram’s father uses Gupta and so on.

These are manufactured surnames, often borrowed to hide the caste we belong to. The most prevalent, widely used surname in my generation is Kumar and Kumari (for girls). Literally, Kumar means an unmarried boy, and Kumari means, an unmarried girl.

When we look at it from a distance, from a perspective alien to Bihar, we can marvel at the idea of not having surnames that represent an identity. An identity which is often taken negatively by the people that take notice of. While at our school, Sainik School Tilaiya, most of the cadets didn’t have any surname that could reveal their caste.

This was a good thing for us on campus as we didn’t have to fiddle ourselves around who to sit with and who to talk to as we had no idea of caste. At the same age, my nephews, conditioned by the the social structures, very much know why they shouldn’t sit and eat with a guy from lower caste.

The doing away with surnames to hide the caste identity gained momentum after the Bihar Movement, helmed by dynamic Jayprakash Narayan or JP, as he is popularly known as. It was late 70s that the demand of reservations and upper caste people’s wrath ensured that the lower caste people hid their identities.

The surnames became a means to target the lower caste in jobs, exams, and at educational institutions along with the prevalent social stigma.

However, the time took a turn and lower caste people started targeting the upper caste as they reached good positions in various fields due to merit and reservation. This was the time when the upper caste people started to hide their surnames under Kumar, Raj etc.

From one angle, it is a beautiful thing to have. People respecting (or hating) people for what they are and not for what castes they belonged to. The menace of this carcinogenic idea becomes visible, and talked about, whenever elections take place.

Political importance

Ideologies, promises, perks and issues take a backseat when elections are announced in Bihar. I vividly remember an aspiring MLA ticket seeking industrialist from my district, taking stock of the caste factor every single morning I visited him. It was a daily ritual for him.

Everyone is, perhaps, clear about ‘how things work’ in Bihar. Jumlebazi is reserved for press meets and rallies. Development issues, problems of state are merely printed words in the manifesto. It is not that people don’t want to hear them or to see them getting realised, rather caste factor in Bihar elections is so rampant, that it percolates to the gene-level.

The aspiring ticket seeker I talked about, would micro-manage the caste equation. Ratio of Bhumihars (An upper caste) in a particular village, influential Bhumihars, Bhumihar mukhiyas would all be printed in a sheet as he would mark out the names on the voter list with caste column written by pen.

It would be followed by how to tackle low-caste dominated areas where the strategists would suggest trying to get the area declared as ‘sensitive’ which would result in lower percentage of polling.

(Mis)use and (ab)use of caste

The most dangerous, and pathetic, portrayal of the caste takes place when every leader from every party starts to use the ‘formula’ to woo voters. Convicted criminals like Lalu Prasad Yadav use the caste card to fool the voters. I remember the days when the schools in my village and adjoining places had no roofs, no teachers and everything was left to the Sun god.

This was the time when Lalu ruled. This was the time when his simple formula was to keep the mass uneducated and tell them anything and without any resource to ascertain the fact, they would believe. Precisely the reason why everyone from my generation had to study in mushrooming private schools or come to places like Delhi.

Now, Lalu Prasad Yadav, a convict who can’t fight elections, is going to rallies and spreading false ideas like BJP wants to end reservation etc. He is trying hard to sell himself as a messiah, a champion of the poor and Dalits. However, the fact remains that if Dalits or Yadavs are one of the most illiterate classes from Bihar, it is due to his ignorance.

Singing the same old tune on a broken harp, RJD supremo, with no other issue in sight, described the crucial Assembly polls in Bihar as a direct fight between the backward castes and forward castes. He gave a clarion call to Yadavas and other backward castes to rally behind the ‘secular alliance’ to defeat the BJP-led NDA.

This is an unfortunate situation for Biharis who are ridiculed for this kind of fixation with caste. It is sad that someone, convicted of scams and barred from fighting elections, has the audacity to incite the caste factor vocally when the Election Commission’s code of conduct is in force.

Lalu’s friend-turned-foe-turned-friend Nitish Kumar coined a term like EBC (Extremely Backward Class) and initiated a series of policies for their betterment. When he came in power in 2005, everyone had hopes. He did work hard to improve education and transport infrastructure. Roads are visible in villages, and schools have buildings.

People saw a ray of hope in Nitish Kumar. He became the metaphorical silver-lining in cloud for Bihar.

However, in the last two years he dumped the development politics and focussed himself on replying to ‘jumlas’ and jibes from BJP. When the future looked bleak, he had to shake hands with Lalu Prasad Yadav and try to justify it by playing the communal and secular cards. These cards didn’t do any good to any party in the 2014 elections as BJP moved ahead with issues while all others tried to counter it by sloganeering.

Caste equations and its implications came to the fore when Lalu, imitating Indira Gandhi’s ‘Garibi Hatao’, gave the election-cry: BhuRaBaL Hatao. Where ‘BhuRaBaL’ denotes the top four upper castes in Bihar: Bhumihar, Rajpoot, Brahman, and Lala.

Centuries of oppression of lower caste was somehow subverted with Lalu’s ascent as they gave him 15 years of power that saw no governance. Deliberate ignorance to policy making was evident when Nitish came to power in 2005 and the state had nothing to lose as it had seen its nadir during Lalu’s ‘Jungle Raaj’. However, it did no good to the lower caste as Lalu was just preparing his family case while (not) running Bihar.

Recalling Lalu’s impact of governance (or the lack of it) in his Telegraph column in 2014, Ramachandra Guha remarked, “Murders and kidnappings were common. It was unsafe to walk the streets of Patna after dark. It was unsafe to drive in many districts even during the day. Fifteen years of rule by Lalu Prasad and his family had depleted the state’s finances and demoralized the bureaucracy.”

Assembly elections

Recently, when Lalu and Nitish were seen ‘championing’ the cause of lower caste (again) by making statements centred around caste, BJP swiftly said it would ensure that CM is not from upper caste.

But the question is, will this caste card have the same impact this time? If we go by this article on Indian Express, the mahadalits (EBCs) who had voted Nitish to power are now disenchanted by his theatrics and handshake with Lalu.

As the election dates are nearing, mud slinging has started with jibes like ‘chaara-chor Lalu’ (Fodder thief Lalu) and ‘Narbhakshi Amit Shah’ (Cannibal Amit Shah). Jungle Raj 2, Madal Raj 2 are the phrases in vogue as Bihar goes to vote.

It is an undeniable fact that as with the search for a suitable groom people go for caste and gotra match, similarly, during elections people vote for caste.

The reason is, they have no other connection from these leaders who seldom have anything else to offer. However, increased literacy and awareness has made this habit somewhat less obvious.

Ticket distribution pattern and caste

NDA has announced its list of candidates for the elections and the caste factor is abundantly clear in the ticket distribution. Although the upper caste constitutes just about 15% of Bihar’s population, it does influence the lower caste votes. They are the opinion leaders in villages where they dominate the power.

Unless, there is a reserved seat for the lower caste as mukhiya, the panchayat seldom gets a lower caste village chief. Even in the reserved seats, the backward caste candidate that wins is the one with the backing of upper caste.

For the coming Bihar polls, as many as 84 upper caste candidates have been fielded by NDA out of the total 243 seats in the assembly. This includes 36 Rajputs and 28 Bhumihars, the two dominant castes of the state.

The grand alliance (JD-U, RJD and Congress), for the 85% of Bihar’s backward population (including OBCs), has announced 64 Yadavs – 48 of them by the RJD alone – apart from 33 Muslims as candidates. This reflects the traditional social support base of MY (Muslim-Yadav) for the RJD and JD-U.

Apart from these 97, the alliance is also dependent on on the OBCs- Koeris and Kurmis. A total of 47 candidates from OBC, 30 Koeris and 17 Kurmis (Nitish Kumar’s caste men), have been fielded by the grand alliance.

The break up looks like this: OBC+EBCs 55%; Muslims 14%; SC+ST 16%; general or upper caste 16%. (percent data is in approx values)

Let’s see how it unfolds

It’s just a matter of few weeks when the results would be announced. It would be interesting to see if Biharis choose to fall for the ‘caste factor’ or go after the rhetorical ‘development’ agenda. Given the increasing literacy rate, still among the lowest in nation, and penetration of social media, people might have better idea of their leaders.

However painful it is for me, as a Bihari, to write this, but caste is not going to go away that easily from the Bihari psyche. Caste equation might not be so obvious in this election as in the 1990s but, for certain, it will have an impact till the realisation of its ghastliness comes to the voter.