Sunday December 17, 2017
Home India Publication o...

Publication of National Herald to be resumed


Lucknow: The Associated Journals Ltd (AJL) that published National Herald, Navjivan and Quami Awaz newspapers has decided to resume their publication following an extraordinary general meeting of its shareholders here on Thursday.

It was also decided that difference in compensation given to workers in Lucknow and Delhi, when the newspapers were closed, will be removed.

AJL managing director Motilal Vora had a given notice in Lucknow-based newspapers last month for an extraordinary general meeting of the AJL on January 21.

Among other things, the notice proposed to seek the approval of the shareholders for turning the AJL into a Section 8 company (non-profit company) under the Companies Act, 2013.

While the National Herald was published in English, Qaumi Awaz was published in Urdu and Navjeevan in Hindi.

The notice had come a day before Congress president Sonia Gandhi and party vice president Rahul Gandhi appeared before a trial court in Delhi in the National Herald case on the complaint of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy. Vora, who is also Congress treasurer, was among those summoned in the case.

The National Herald newspaper was launched during the freedom struggle in 1938 by Jawaharlal Nehru, who went on to become independent India’s first prime minister.

The paper originally served as a mouthpiece of the Congress. However, over the decades, circulation dropped and finances dried out, and it finally closed in 2008 with a debt of Rs.90 crore.

In a bid to keep AJL afloat, the Congress party gave the company unsecured, interest-free loans for some years up to 2010. On November 23, 2010, the AJL was taken over by a newly-floated company called Young Indian Private Limited (YIL) with the Gandhi family loyalists Suman Dubey and Sam Pitroda as directors.

The All India Congress Committee allegedly decided to assign the nearly Rs.90 crore debt owed to it by AJL to YIL, thus making it the owner of the debt in the books.

In December 2010, the AJL is said to have decided to transfer its entire equity to Young Indian in lieu of the Rs.90 crore debt. Young Indian paid Rs.50 lakh for this acquisition.

The AJL, which originally owed Rs.90 crore to the Congress, became a fully-owned subsidiary of Young Indian by virtue of this decision and transaction.

In December 2010, Rahul Gandhi was appointed its director and in January 2011, Sonia Gandhi also joined the board as a director. Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes too were appointed to the Young Indian board on the same day.

As per documents, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi have individual shareholdings of 38 percent each in the company while Vora and Fernandes hold the remaining 24 percent in equal parts. (IANS)

Next Story

Reforms could be victim in National Herald fiasco


New Delhi: There are unlikely to be any outright winners in the latest confrontation between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress over the National Herald case which entails a legal battle involving Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.

What is more, there will be an unsavoury twist to the case with less than comforting implications for the BJP if the Congress’s crown prince carries out his threat of courting imprisonment. Even if the ruling party dubs such an act as theatrical, it will be aware that the sight of Rahul Gandhi behind bars cannot but be embarrassing for the BJP.

Such a dramatic turn of events may fuel speculation that the absence of a sound legal defence has compelled the Congress to turn the encounter into a political duel. But such tricks of the trade are an acceptable part of democratic politics. For the BJP, the immediate problem will be the future of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Bill since the Congress is bound to use the charge of being a victim of political vendetta to stall parliament.

It is a provocative tactic which seemingly suits Rahul Gandhi’s post-sabbatical belligerence which is increasingly resembling his late uncle Sanjay Gandhi’s confrontational brand of politics. If the fate of the GST Bill is sealed for the time being, the BJP may wonder whether the penchant of the maverick in its ranks, Subramanian Swamy, to involve his adversaries in court cases may have backfired.

The BJP may argue that Swamy has been acting on his own in pursuing the National Herald case and that it is mean-minded of the Congress to mix up the GST Bill with its own legal difficulties in a Goebbelsian manoeuvre, as Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has said. But, since democracy is known to be messy, the case for the compartmentalization of its various aspects may not be foolproof.

As it is, the Congress has found a supporter in Mamata Banerjee even if she is playing her own game of keeping the Congress away from a possible alliance with the Left in West Bengal before next year’s assembly elections.

Besides, both the Congress and the Trinamool Congress have a point in saying that the interest which the central authorities have shown in the National Herald case is not visible in the Vyapam and the public distribution system scams in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, which are governed by the BJP.

Nothing demonstrated the extra interest that the authorities have taken in the National Herald case more clearly than the transfer of an Enforcement Directorate official who had dismissed the charges against the Congress leaders. The transfer was quickly followed by the appointment of another official and the revival of the case after Swamy had accused the previous incumbent of having been favourably disposed towards the Congress.

It is now up to the judiciary to address the nitty-gritty of the affair. But public interest will be focussed more on how the political skirmishes unfold than in the details of the case.

As Sonia Gandhi’s comment that she is Indira Gandhi’s daughter-in-law shows, she and her party have in mind the blunder committed by the Janata government in 1977 when it tried to implicate the doughty former prime minister in legal tangles.

Indira Gandhi’s spirited response – like a sherni or lioness, as was said at the time – paved the way for the Congress’s return to power in 1980.

History may not always repeat itself – or does so in the form of a farce, as Marx said – but even if the Congress under Sonia Gandhi is not what the Congress was under Indira Gandhi, the BJP also is not as much of a winner as it was last year, as its massive defeats in Delhi and Bihar have shown.

The party has also exhibited a vindictive streak as its cases against Teesta Setalvad for her role in aiding Gujarat’s riot victims show. Its acts against reputed NGOs like Greenpeace also underline a similar mentality. Its claim, therefore, that the Narendra Modi government is no more than a bystander in the face-off between the Congress’s big guns and Swamy, who is a member of the BJP’s national executive, will not be widely believed.

For all practical purposes, therefore, it is going to be a Tom and Jerry show with neither emerging with flying colours. Each side will try to hit the other where it hurts the most – the Congress by creating a ruckus in parliament even if it earns the reputation of being petty-minded, and the BJP by arguing that none in the Congress’s first family – Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Robert Vadra – is above the law.

The endless slugfest, however, between the two “national” parties (although neither has a presence in all parts of the country) carries the threat of not only derailing the reforms – Swamy has suggested that the GST can be dumped for the sake of fighting corruption – but also of fostering the impression that the parliamentary system is becoming unworkable.

It is unfortunate that at a time when Modi adopted a conciliatory tone in parliament, a member of his party acted in a manner which introduced fresh complications in the relations between the BJP and the Congress. It is almost as if the right-hand does not know what the left is doing.(IANS)

(Amulya Ganguly)

Next Story

Swami Chinmayananda: The man who found Supreme Consciousness through Vedanta



By Gaurav Sharma

Words such as, ‘India is free, but are Indians free ?’ have a deep impact on the psyche and compel one to reflect upon the reality of life.

Proclamations, such as “Without the touch of life (read God), a sinner cannot sin neither can a monk meditate,” are more than just dry philosophical words. They are powerful realizations, which can leave the believer, the seeker and the non-believer, all at once, bemused with their own existence.

One does not require an astrologer to fathom that the aforementioned words are affirmations of a monk, in this case, Swami Chinmayananda, a Vedantist, a teacher, and the founder of Chinmaya mission.

Well, you might be wondering that there are countless Swamis donning the ochre robe nowadays, then what is so special about Swami Chinmayananda?

For starters, the man holds quite a few parallels with the modern-educated-man of the today’s age: Highly sceptical about the existence of a higher power, yet immensely curious to know more about himself. Extremely talented yet restless.

One can also safely assume that when Prime Minister Narendra Modi releases coins commemorating the birth centenary of Swami Chinmayananda, the person must hold some importance.

Born as Balakrishna Menon in 1916 in Ernakulam, Kerala, Swami Chinmayananda was a student of Lucknow University. As a freedom fighter, who was jailed by the British in 1941, Balakrishna had to bear the torture for rebellion and for supporting the cause of freedom.

He was virtually left to die by barbaric British soldiers when a friend’s family managed to scrape him through the grip of death. Soon, however, the death of that very friend set the ball rolling for the future Swami to ponder over life, its meaning and purpose.

Almost immediately, he joined the National Herald as a journalist, and his slick and powerful words started commanding respect from both the masses and the intelligentsia. The paper’s circulation also snowballed to record highs, courtesy Balakrishna’s meaningful articles.

Still, however, something was pricking Balakrishna inside out. Small gestures, such as the prosperous ones bickering over a few extra rupees with rickshawallas, but offering a sumptuous amount of money to the Sadhu, got him utterly disillusioned with holy men.

With deep resentment against such Sadhus, whom Balakrishna thought were nothing but mere charlatans, he set off to Rishikesh to expose the myth of religion. There, he encountered Swami Sivananda, under whom he was again conflicted with the following of meaningless rituals.

Still, the seeker in Balakrishna persisted over the rationalist. He gave up his job and earned the name of Chinmayananda, meaning Bliss or Supreme Consciousness. Soon, he moved further north, where he studied the scriptures for almost 10 years under the tutelage of Swami Tapovan.

The metamorphosis from an unusual non-believer to an inquisitive seeker and finally to a Vedantist is remarkable transition, which renders the life of Swami Chinmayanada unique in the annals of spirituality.

And, he did not stop there. Hardly, any time had passed after his transformation that he launched a spiritual renaissance movement by the name of Chinmaya Mission. The mission, which has branches spread in over 300 centers in India and abroad, conducts spiritual, educational and charitable activities that have revolutionized the lives of innumerable people.

Chinmaya Mission aims to spread Advaita Vedanta, the Vedic philosophy expounded by the 8th century saint Sankaracharya.

Swami Chinmayanada’s life is a testimony to the fact that we all are seekers, in search of bliss.