Siya Ke Ram: Distortions, lies, and mockery of Ramayana

41
24260
Photo: mtwiki.blogspot.com

By Nithin Sridhar

Last month, Star Plus, an entertainment channel in India, launched a new TV serial on the story of Lord Rama with much fanfare. The serial titled ‘Siya Ke Ram’ had promised to portray Ramayana from ‘Sita’s perspective’. Nikhil Sinha, the producer-director of the serial had further stated that the serial was well rooted in facts and based on the original story.

However, one month down the line, the serial appears to have taken wings of its own and deviated completely from the original text of Valmiki Ramayana. Moreover, the much-touted perspective of Sita is yet to emerge as well.

Though the serial at first had raised expectations of this writer with its VFX, soon it became clear that the serial has VFX alone without much substance or value to write about. The serial has not only distorted the original story, but has tried to impose modern secular-liberal values upon the Ramayana thereby making a complete mockery of the Hindu text which is not only considered as a true account of history (itihasa) in Hindu tradition but is also held in high respect and sacredness by millions of Hindus.

The very first episode began with portraying King Dasharatha and Queen Kausalya as crybabies, with the former always worrying about his sons, especially about Rama and the later mourning for her daughter- Shanta who was no longer with them. But a single reading of Valmiki Ramayana, which is the original text of Ramayana composed by Sage Valmiki, it becomes clear that neither the King nor the queen was portrayed as crybabies.

In fact, in the Bala-Khanda (11.2), King Dasharatha is described as being righteous, truthful, and resplendent. In other words, he was far from being a crybaby! The serial actually shows Dasharatha as grieving and longing for his sons when they were away from him for studying in Gurukula (traditional school). But, in all probabilities, the princes never went to any Gurukula and were trained in the palace itself. Valmiki Ramayana does not mention anything about sending them away. Instead, it says that Rama and the princes were well versed in Vedas, archery, and were always rendering service to their father (1.18.27,28, 36,37).

Now, coming to the issue of Kausalya’s grief and Shanta, this writer searched hard to find any reference for Queen Kausalya mourning over her daughter in the Valmiki Ramayana but was unable to find even a single reference to it.

Shanta with her husband Rishyasringa as portrayed in the serial. Photo: www.siyakram.in
Shanta with her husband Rishyasringa as portrayed in the serial. Photo: www.siyakram.in

The serial portrays Shanta as being the daughter of the Dasharatha and Kausalya, who was sent to seduce and marry Rishyasringa so that the Rishi can come and perform Putrakameshti Yajna for the begetting of Rama and other princes. Thus, the serial portrays how Dasharatha gave up his daughter for the sake of his sons. It further shows how Shanta was well accomplished in every way yet Dasharatha was never satisfied with her and hankered for a son. This hankering of Dasharatha resulted in Shanta being compelled to sacrifice her freedom and comforts and she went and lived in the forest with Rishyasringa. The serial further shows that this fact was initially kept hidden from Rama and other princes.

Now, let us look into what Valmiki Ramayana has to say about Shanta. Shanta was given in adoption to Romapaada, the King of Anga kingdom and a close friend of Dasharata. The adoption must have happened when Shanta was a child though no mention of her age during adoption is mentioned. But, it is clear that Shanta was brought up by Romapaada as his own daughter. Valmiki Ramayana mentions that when Romapaada’s kingdom was suffering from severe drought, he sent his courtesans to bring Rishyasringa to his kingdom (1.10.7).

When the Rishi arrived in his kingdom, the kingdom was showered with rains and later Romapaada gave Shanta’s hand in marriage to the Rishi (1.10.29-32). After marriage Shanta and Rishyasringa both lived in Anga kingdom itself (1.10.33) and not in the forest. Dasharatha later asked the help of Romapaada to request his son-in-law Rishyasringa to perform Putrakameshti Yajna so that Dasharatha can beget sons.

Therefore, from the Valmiki Ramayana, it becomes clear that Shanta was married to her husband according to the norms of those times and there was neither any compulsion nor any sacrifice on the part of Shanta nor did she undergo any suffering from the marriage. In fact, the Mahabharata account of the story of Shanta and Rishyasringa says that they both shared a loving relationship similar to Nala and Damayanti or Vashishta and Arundathi.

More importantly, Shanta was not sent to seduce Rishyashringa so that Dasharata can beget sons and thus there is absolutely no connection between Shanta marrying Rishyasringa and Rishyasringa helping Dasharatha in begetting sons.

So, the question that naturally arises is why did the serial distort the truth and impose notions of patriarchy and misogyny? Why was Shanta depicted as a victim? Why was Shanta used as a tool to depict supposed discrimination against daughters, or to depict how women are forced to make sacrifices when no such thing is actually recorded in the original text?

Patriarchy, misogyny, discrimination against daughters are all some of the trends that could be observed in current society. More importantly, these are the trends stressed in the left-liberal narratives of the society. On the other hand, Indic narrative is rooted in the all-encompassing concept of Dharma- duty and righteousness and all social trends- both good and bad- are analyzed from the Dharmic standpoint. The fact that the serial has distorted the original Dharmic narrative of Ramayana and has tried to superimpose social ills present in the current society and trends of current left-liberal narratives onto Ramayana, raises serious questions about the professionalism and the motives of the makers of this serial?

Further, Shanta’s story is not the only case of such distortions and super-impositions of left-liberal narratives. Consider the event of Ashwamedha Yajna (Horse-Sacrifice) portrayed in the serial. According to the serial, when King Dasharatha performs Ashwamedha Yajna, first Sita is shown as stopping the horse in its path, then Rama asserts that the horse should not be killed to complete the sacrifice and instead a golden idol of the horse should be used. Rama also makes a speech about animal rights and how traditions should be broken.

The whole narrative depicts not only the ignorance of the makers of the show about Hindu rituals, but also their agenda to superimpose modern narratives of animal rights on Hindu practices.

It is not that Dharmic perspective is insensitive to animal life. Hindu scriptures stipulate serving animals as one of the duties of householders (Bhuta-yajna). Hindu scriptures perceive animals as inseparable part of the Universe and teaches people to practice Ahimsa (non-injury). In fact, Manu Smriti (5.53) says that one who renounces consumption of eating meat attains spiritual benefit equal to that attained after conducting 100 Ashwamedha Yajnas.

At the same time, it must be remembered that Ashwamedha Yajna was performed for the overall welfare of the society- material, spiritual, and ecological. It served as a tool for the Kings to distribute their wealth among the poor and needy. The citizens were given in charity, whatever they were in need of. The landless got the lands, the house-less got the house, people in need of gold were given gold, etc. And the spiritual benefits derived from the Yajna is limitless and helps to enrich the spiritual atmosphere in the society. More importantly, the ritual is such that, the animals sacrificed in it not only attains heaven, but they also attain higher birth. It is for this reason, the sacrifice of animals in Yajnas is not considered as ‘Himsa’ (violence) as even the animals attain welfare.

Hence, according to Hinduism, sacrificing of animals in Yajnas that causes welfare of sacrificed animals as well is Dharma. On the other hand, modern activities like breeding animals for slaughtering or killing animals for their skin, etc. are considered unrighteous (Adharma) because there is no welfare of the animals.

First, the Ashwamedha Yajna shown in the serial never happened as far as Valmiki Ramayana is concerned. Valmiki Ramayana speaks about Dasharatha performing Horse-sacrifice along with Putrakameshti Yajna for begetting his sons. But, he does not perform any horse-sacrifice after the birth of his sons.

Second, even in the Ashwamedha Yajna that was conducted by Dasharatha before the birth of Rama, a real horse was sacrificed (1.14.32-36) and not a horse idol.

Sita with the Horse of Ashwamedha Yajna shown in the serial. Photo: www.pinkvilla.com
Sita with the Horse of Ashwamedha Yajna as shown in the serial. Photo: www.pinkvilla.com

Third, Sita is shown as stopping the horse without realizing the fact that whoever stops the horse and ties it, he/she must wage a war. Yet, in order to portray Sita as a rebel, the scene has been included in the serial.

Fourth, Valmiki Ramayana says Rama is a Dharma-Murti, the personification of Dharma. Thus, Rama very well knew that killing of the horse in the Yajna is not considered as Himsa/violence because the animal thus sacrificed attains spiritual and material welfare as well. Hence, Rama would never have called for a replacement of real horse with a horse idol based on shallow arguments not rooted in Dharma. But without understanding this nuance, the serial tries to give a lecture about the animal rights based on modern left-liberal narratives!

Fifth, the serial portrays Rishi Vashishta as calling Ashwamedha Yajna as a ‘pratha’ or a practice or a tradition based on common belief. But, the fact is Ashwamedha Yajna is not a ‘pratha’, it is a Dharmic practice given in Vedas themselves. So, there is no question about it being a simple matter of faith. It is a Dharmic obligation of the Kings for the welfare of his people. Though, it is true that sacrifice of animals during Yajnas has been prohibited in Kaliyuga according to some Dharmic texts because people no longer have the competency to properly perform those Yajnas and cause animals to attain higher birth. But, Lord Rama was not in Kali Yuga. He was in Treta-Yuga when there were hundreds of great Rishis like Vashishta, Rishyasringa etc. who were capable of performing even complex of Yajnas for the welfare of the world.

In other words, the whole events related to Ashwamedha Yajna shown in the serial is a fabrication introduced to distort the essence of Hindu rituals and superimpose left-liberal narratives about animal rights which incidentally is invoked only with respect to Hindu rituals and not in any other circumstances. (Remember Beef parties?).

Then there was the argument between Yajnavalkya and Gargi that ended up being a debate on love rather than being a sublime discussion about Brahman as shown in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Also, the depiction of Gargi and the way Sunayana (Janak’s wife) speaks about her completely goes against the high respect Gargi actually held during that period. Then, the Rakshasas (demons) were portrayed as tribal people, which clearly is a colonial construction propagated by a few scholars. Hindu tradition itself considered Rakshasas as being different species than humans. Yet, the fight between Rama and Lakshmana duo and the Rakshasas headed by Maricha and Subhahu were depicted as a fight between the royal kings and tribal people! Maybe the makers of the serial are too much influenced by the Aryan invasion myth!

Rakshasas portrayed as tribal people in the serial. Photo: Google Plus
Rakshasas portrayed to resemble tribal people in the serial. Photo: Google Plus

There was also a conversation between Janak and his wife, wherein Sita’s mother is apprehensive about educating Sita and tells Janak, if Sita is educated, she will face numerous problems after marriage! Another clear attempt at superimposing the perceptions about girl education prevalent from last few centuries on Ramayana.

The events mentioned here are by no means exhaustive. There are many more such incidents and scenes portrayed in the serial which clearly betray attempts at imposing present social values on Ramayana, distortion of facts, and fabrication of lies.

In short, ‘Siya Ke Raam’ ends up making a complete mockery of Ramayana and Hindu practices. But the question is, will it take the moral responsibility for its distortions and mockery?

The serial starts with a disclaimer saying that the serial intends to hurt no religious sentiments, yet that is precisely what it is doing. It is distorting the facts of Valmiki Ramayana and fabricating events that are not present in it and more importantly, it is trying to discredit Hindu practices by superimposing elements from left-liberal worldview into the situations of Ramayana.

If the intentions of the serial makers were really genuine and they wanted to teach certain values to counter current problems, they could have made a completely new mythological serial something on the lines of Game of Thrones. Yet, again and again, the film and serial production industry take a short cut and produce serials that bear the name of historical or mythological characters for the sake of earning TRP, but without an iota of historical or mythological truths in them. This happened with Jodha Akbar serial in the past and it is happening now with ‘Siya ke Raam’.

The serial could have served a fantastic platform for imparting the Dharmic teachings inherent in the story of Valmiki Ramayana that would have helped the common people. Yet, the serial makers chose to reduce the whole effort into a distortion of Hinduism to propagate modern left-liberal narratives.

If this is not a mockery of Ramayana and Hinduism in the name of entertainment, then what is?

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 NewsGram
  • Rohit Arya

    The
    media has, by and large, become the enemedia as far as Hindus are
    concerned. And all the people working on the serial they have no qualms
    about throwing their own heritage into the dustbin so long as they get
    paid. Which is the other problem, the Hindu
    disdain for their own culture. Legal routes are too time consuming to
    be effective and the disclaimer loophole is already there. Violent
    protests work but they are not an option, I really do not see what can
    be done except small candles like this in an enthusiastically welcomed
    darkness. The leftist are determined to attack everything Hindu and turn
    it to rubble.

  • rep

    Dude you need to get a life

    • and you need to go fuck yourself!

    • thesteelguy

      why don’t you go about yours

  • thesteelguy

    Great piece! Thank you for writing this. Hope the word spreads!

  • NagBelad

    A lot of garbage on Indian tv channels do not surprise me at all. Indian TV, “intelligentsia” in collusion with leftists will be the cause of destruction of Bharat after Islamic rule and Colonial Europeans.

    • Arya

      most people involved in Bollywood movies and Indian serials are secular leftists

  • Chandrakala Radhakrishnan

    Please read sita by devdutt pattanaik before posting such stuff. There are references not only to Ramayana as authored by Valmiki but countless others too.

  • Mayank

    The intellectual honesty and the professionalism have been missing in current time story-tellers. There ignorance of dharmic ideas is clearly visible in their work, we need credible people in this field who do their work with utmost authenticuty.

  • Vince
  • Liquid8r

    Dude, watch the serial – they say the story line is from Tulsi Ramayan. So what’s the point of comparing it with Valmiki Ramayan and drawing your conclusion. Research before you write.

  • V. Madhukar Kamath

    We have skipped watching the serial on ‘Siya Ke Ram’ which is clearly an attempt to twist the Ramayana to suit the PRESENT NEEDS of the so called secular Indians.

  • So

    Not a big fan of the serial however, what is right, is right. Please get yourself educated before lashing out in a full page rant.

    The serial does not claim to be based on Valmiki Ramayan alone. There are various versions of Ramayan. Please research your work before posting anything on a public forum.

    Perhaps, you can start here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versions_of_Ramayana

    • Arya

      yes but orginal is valmiki Ramayana and normally Hindus base it on this ramayana

      • vik

        Whichever version it is following, it doesn’t portray the facts accurately.

  • Dhaval Yash Das

    JAI SRI RAM
    Thanks for this amazing article, indeed Rishishring was so innocent, he never saw a women in his life, the women’s who came to seduce him, she hugged rishi and took him to the Kingdom of King Romapaads…he took those women’s as a divine saints with wonderful bodies and their bodily features as he explains to his father, he never knew the difference between male and female, father warns him about demons in mayawi swarupa, however things works by Gods will and those women’s somehow takes rishi to the kingdom, assuming those women’s as rishis he sits in their cruise which looked like a palace, so huge with pools and huge houses indeed, he reaches the kingdom of King Romapaads. When his father comes to know. With anger he visits the kingdom…..all praja were been asked to glorify his father and rishi shring….he was happy and accepted the destiny. This is what even i heard from gurudev acc to valmiki ramayan.

    Even Ashwamedha yagya…those Horse also known as a Shyam karna, these specialised horse were born with one ear shyam/blackish coloured. They were given birth only and only for ashwamedhA yagya and not for riding. The horse after wandering the Akhanda bharata/entire bhumandal comes to the kingdom…tired, wounded due to so much of travelling….was then put in fire and he got a divine body, got liberated to higher specie of life or attain heavenly planet . It wasn’t himsa but dharma for chakravarti kings.

    Ramanand sagarjis Ramayan is very much authentic, can say around 90% as mentioned in Ramayan but bit incomplete but far much better then modern ramayan.

  • Asmita Jain

    You do know that there are other Ramayanas besides Valmiki Ramayana, right? And the makers have not stated anywhere that they are following Valmiki Ramayana. Though i agree that there is an absence of Sita’s perspective as touted but otherwise you cannot ask anybody to follow a mythological ‘truth’ in a ‘fictional’ serial.

    • Varinder Singh

      Who told u Ramayana is myth. Its just a hear say people say. Its not a myth. The only mythological part about hindu scriptures is the the stories they make about ganesha etc. and that is only beacuse to teach something in very simple way. Rest is not Myth. The stories are called “Dant Kathaye”.

    • Arya

      yes but when Hindus speak about Ramayana it is normally Valmiki Ramayana and Tulsidas Ramayana which is based on Valmiki as it is the original Ramayana

    • vik

      Please give some examples of other Ramayanas and how they are different from Valmiki Ramayana. Doesn’t matter which Ramayana they are following, it would be great for you to show which “other” Ramayana they are following. Ramayana was not written on “Patriarchal Ram’s” perspective as well. And it isn’t mythology.

  • Shaily Chaudhary

    This serial is influenced by Devdutt Pattnaik’ ‘Sita’s Ram’ book… the story of Shanta is totally based on the lines of thought of Devdutt Pattnaik.
    Here goes the article:
    http://devdutt.com/articles/indian-mythology/the-story-of-rams-elder-sister.html

  • Geetanjali Mukherjee

    I like the serial… Its entertaining and informative. It inspired me to learn all about Lord Ram. I would like to read the Ramacharitamanas and develop my own perspective… thanks to the makers of Siya Ke Ram… period. Your article seems shallow. Please read the Ramayana by Valmiki and Tulsidas and then come up with a piece. Silly boy Nitin!

  • Varinder Singh

    Hi Nithin, I completely agree with u. The chracters are shown like they show in there saas bahu serials. The writers have absolutely no knowledge about charcters of rishis, dashrath, lakshman etc. Leave beside charater of Ram. I my view such serials should not be allowed to be made. As character of Ram is bigger than words and can only be realize through proper readings and knowledge of vedas. Leave beside ram I am frustrated the way they have shown Raavan. I mean he is Asur but he possess grate knowlege. He was considered as maha pandit of his time. The way they show him is like he is an idiot. Like movie villlians.
    Its just amazing how the whole hindu commmunity is stting and watching this show. And no body saying anything against it. Everytime I watch this serials I feel frustrated.
    Someone should file case against them. I am willing to support. I live in Canada, so can’t be physically there but. Willing to support the best I can.
    Varinder Singh

  • Romeo

    Those mighty Asura’s, set out from Lanka LIKE THE GODS leaving Amaravati – Valmiki Ramayana ha ha you can depict Rama and his Vanara army as tribals too ha ha.

    Danava WHITE AS THE CLOUDS… Adi Parva. Davana was a branch of Asura. Kalayavana whose father was Brahmin was an asura too. See, Asura’s are not really dark ha ha.

  • Romeo

    In mythology, if you think, the #1 Aryan should be Vaivasvata Manu, a south Indian king, the manu of current Manavantara ha ha.

  • Shodasi : Secrets of the Ramayana

    Author : Seshendra Sharma

    for reviews and other details :

    http://www.facebook.com/shodasi/

    Thanks / Regards

  • Sinog

    Star Plus is owned by Fox Network -> Rupert Murdoch.

  • கே மோகன் ஹைதராபாத்

    Ban the serial as it is giving distorted version and increasing the blood pressure of the ardent devotees of Sita and Ram

  • Gurpreet Singh

    where is the Sanjeevani Booti??
    and how come Garud Dev sucked the poison of Naag Baan. was the naag baan in the script ??
    and how come Lakshman as well as Raam were injured ?????
    total shit this is
    I am watching this serial to know what all situations Sita has gone through?? but here the whole Ramayana is deviated from its actual script. May Lord Raam forgive them.

  • Chandrakanth

    across India we see Lord Hanuman’s scrulpture carrying Sanjivini hill, where is this scene, and Shri Ram loosing his life to Indrajit!!?big joke! definately it got its own wings, change the name to ‘directors ke Ram’. worst serial w.r.t story narating, this will be hit becz of its graphics.

  • amritansh

    nitin shridhar sir it is a great piece of article but one thing needs to be mentioned here that great vedic scholars such as maharishidayanandsaraswati and shripad damodar satvalekar have clearly stated that vedas do not sanction killing of harmless animals specially for yagya

  • amritanshjha

    sir nitin shridhar it is a great piece of article but one thing needs to be added is that great vedic scholars Like mahrishidayanand saraswati and shripad damodar satvalekar have clearly stated that vedas do not sanction killing harmless animals specially for yagya

  • Anonymous

    Narrow-mindedness i sense in you Mr. Nithin.
    I Assume that you know that there are various versions of Ramayana and the Valmiki Ramayana was written centuries ago and is not the ‘original, unspoiled, pure, authentic’ text of Valmiki we read today. This serial takes into account many different versions of Ramayan and other texts containing information on Ramayan and its characters.(Like Mahabharat). And in episodes they do mention at bottom in hindi with significant font size that from where this was taken, only if the piece of story is too much unknown. Also the serial is based on Devdutt Pattnaik’s book.

    You must have heard of Amish Tripathi’s ‘Scion of Ikshvaku’. Just read that and I bet that you will surely criticize it for ‘reinventing the script, changing the story etc’. Just look at that book’s story, the author changed it so much that Dashrath ended up losing to Ravan in war and ostracizing Ram, yet the book gained positive reviews. Something similar does happen on Siya ke Ram but they potray it differently instead of twisting them completely like you said. Siya ke Ram gives the median/mean of all the important Ramayanas out there in India. Taking for example you point on ‘Rakshasas being tribal’. Ask people on what/who were vanaras. More than half would say ‘monkeys’, some would say ‘a forest tribe’. These are two different ideas on one concept. Now rakhasas are ‘other species’ or ‘humans/homo-neanderthals(another old now exticnt) human species who are totally against Dharma’ Being against Dharma and being anarchic their appearance looks like tribals. The serial shows how the events would have transpired that other versions of Ramayana show. The serial stays realistic and that’s why portrays differently.

    To the line “If this is not a mockery of Ramayana and Hinduism in the name of entertainment, then what is?” I have the answer, it is ‘a retelling of Ramayana, in a different way. Like other different Ramayanas its unique’ And I write this with the confidence that I have more than average knowledge on Hindu mythology (rather ancient Indian history) than an average ‘modern-Hindu’.
    Anonymous because hey narrow-mindedness tells people that a 14 y/o teenager cannot be so much well-informed about such things and like other kids is stupid and naive. (As a side note how many people know that there are 3 weapons of Lord Brahma and what each of them does and 14 realms/worlds in Hindu csomology. Few people i say) (Nevertheless i have given my real email if anone wants to check my knowledge)

  • Anonymous

    Narrow-mindedness i sense in you Mr. Nithin.
    I Assume that you know that there are various versions of Ramayana and the Valmiki Ramayana was written centuries ago and is not the ‘original, unspoiled, pure, authentic’ text of Valmiki we read today. This serial takes into account many different versions of Ramayan and other texts containing information on Ramayan and its characters.(Like Mahabharat). And in episodes they do mention at bottom in hindi with significant font size that from where this was taken, only if the piece of story is too much unknown. Also the serial is based on Devdutt Pattnaik’s book.
    You must have heard of Amish Tripathi’s ‘Scion of Ikshvaku’. Just read that and I bet that you will surely criticize it for ‘reinventing the script, changing the story etc’. Just look at that book’s story, the author changed it so much that Dashrath ended up losing to Ravan in war and ostracizing Ram, yet the book gained positive reviews. Something similar does happen on Siya ke Ram but they potray it differently instead of twisting them completely like you said. Siya ke Ram gives the median/mean of all the important Ramayanas out there in India. Taking for example you point on ‘Rakshasas being tribal’. Ask people on what/who were vanaras. More than half would say ‘monkeys’, some would say ‘a forest tribe’. These are two different ideas on one concept. Now rakhasas are ‘other species’ or ‘humans who are totally against Dharma’ Being against Dharma and being anarchic their appearance looks like tribals. The serial shows how the events would have transpired that other versions of Ramayana show. The serial stays realistic and that’s why portrays differently.
    To the line “If this is not a mockery of Ramayana and Hinduism in the name of entertainment, then what is?” I have the answer, it is ‘a retelling of Ramayana, in a different way. Like other different Ramayans its unique’ And I write this with the confidence that I have more than average knowledge on Hindu mythology (rather ancient Indian history) than an average ‘modern-Hindu’. Going anonymous because hey how common it is that a 14y/o is well informed about mythology. Old narrow-mindedness, kids are not supposed to know this much.

    • ಅಶೋಕ ಭ ಕಲ್ಗುಡ್ಡೆ

      Need to learn more about rakshas Pichashis if learn sankrit. According to Bavishya purana Mohammad was Raskshasa. Rakshasar are evil humans. pishasha are cannibals. Vanaras are tribals and are with Rama.

  • vyas

    Why all this hue and cry? The serial clearly states that it is a work of fiction made purely for entertainment. Please learn to appreciate each one’s individuality.
    And I respect tradition and Valmiki but this is not Valmiki Ramayan. So go with an open mind.

  • Kanchan Agrawal

    Siya Ke Ram: Distortions, lies, and mockery of Ramayana and hurting faith of Hinduism.

    The serial make a fun of character of sita while he showed Sita imprisoned by Ravan and insulted in Lanka wearing iron chain. Its not written any where in any Ramayana. May I know the source which The producer of the serial refering to this serial.
    Secondly There is no presentation no back ground music in serial as it was in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan made 30 yeare prior to this serial. Even there is no background prepared for the war. No story we ever heard about

    Tarini that Ravan had a son who was devote of Vishnu. Even sita did nothing While sitting under Ashoka and no body tries to meet her from Ravan’s Family. No story ever heard about Shurpnakha’a attempt to kill or insult Sita as it was shown in Siya ke Ram. War presentation is also very poor while the technology is more developed in 30 years. The war presentation 100 times much better in Ramanand Ragar’s Ramayan made before 30 years.
    There is also a fun of war between the great warrior Lakhsman and Meghnad. it was like two wrester were fighting aimlessly. There was no diolouge or devade in Meghnad and Lakshman. and no presentation of any kind of war, while Lakhaman & Meghnad war is the second most important war of Ramayan after Ram and Ravan. Lakshman and Meghnad seems to be fighting in mud like child not like warrior and mud therapy disguise there original appearance.
    The most important Scene of Meeting Vibhishaa and Hanuman was not shown in any episode. Even It was Hanuman who brought The God of Eagle to save Rama and Lakshmans. Here also a wrong story represented by Producer that Eagle came himself on calling of shiva. No Episode depict the story of Vibhishna’a coronation by Ram when they Build Rameshwaram Shiv-ling. Producer unnecessary focused much on Shurpnakha’s Character and 4 or 5 episode only to Punish Sita. While her role should be over after her nose was cut and complaint in front of Ravan’s for the same.
    May be Producer was follwin Star Plus tradition of Villain Lady character to take revenge or to feel jealous from other ladies. He might forgot that its a mythological story that should be presented in its real Form. Now a days the Main Characters Ram And Lakshman Seems to be carrying beard on their face. Did producer have seen anywhere Ram Lakshman’s such appearance in any picture. Over all he is just making a fun of Hindusim and trying to modernize the real story instead of its original form.

  • Kanchan Agrawal

    Siya Ke Ram: Distortions, lies, and mockery of Ramayana and hurting faith of Hinduism.

    The serial make a fun of character of sita They showed Sita imprisoned by Ravan and insulted in Lanka wearing iron chain. Its a sin representating Maa Sita in such appearance. Its not written any where in any Ramayana. May I know the source which The producer of the serial referring to this serial.

    Producer also forgot to show that It was not the real sita who went Lanka. It was Maya Sita. Original Sita was hiden by Shri Ram in Custody of God of Fire. Ravan Couldn’t touch original Sita.

    Secondly There is no presentation no back ground music in serial as it was in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan made 30 years prior to this serial. Even there is no background prepared for the war. War Presentation and technology usded in iRamanand Sagar’s Ramaan is still very much ;popular and appreciable.Today WE had 3d and 4d technology however director and producer used very poor technology for war presentation

    No story we ever heard about Tarini that Ravan had a son who was devote of Vishnu. Even sita did nothing While sitting under Ashok Vatika and no body tries to meet her from Ravan’s Family. Sita did not eat anything in Lanka however Siya ke Ram showed that Sita met Mandodari many times and taught her cooking. Preparing Kheer for Her Father in Law’s Shard.
    No Story Even heard about Bhool Bulaiya Build by Ravan. No story ever heard about Shurpnakha’a attempt to kill or insult Sita as it was shown in Siya ke Ram. War presentation is also very poor while the technology is more developed in 30 years. The war presentation 100 times much better in Ramanand Ragar’s Ramayan made before 30 years. No Opening Songs no background music in war or anywhere in serial.

    There is also a fun of war between the great warrior Lakhsman and Meghnad. it was like two wrestler were fighting aimlessly. There was no dialogue or devade in Meghnad and Lakshman. and no presentation of any kind of war, while Lakhaman & Meghnad war is the second most important war of Ramayan after Ram and Ravan. Lakshman and Meghnad seems to be fighting in mud like child not like warrior and mud therapy disguise there original appearance. No story evr heard that Lakshman fight with Meghnad alone outside of war area. Only Meghnad keep Lakshman away from Hanuman because Hanuman can protect Lakshman from Amogh Sakhti.Even War duration and argument between warriors are nowhere is serial

    The most important Scene of Meeting Vibhishaa and Hanuman was noshown in any episode. Even It was Hanuman who brought The God of Eagle to save Rama and Lakshman. Here is also a wrong story represented by Producer that Eagle came himself on calling of Lord shiva. No Episode depict the story of Vibhishna’s coronation by Ram when they Build Rameshwaram Shiv-ling. Producer unnecessary focused much on Shurpnakha’s Character and 4 or 5 episode only to Punish Sita. While her role should be over after her nose was cut and complaint in front of Ravan’s for the same.
    May be Producer was following Star Plus tradition of Villain Lady character to take revenge or to feel jealous from other ladies. He might forgot that its a mythological story that should be presented in its real Form. Now a days the Main Characters Ram And Lakshman Seems to be carrying beard on their face. Did producer have seen anywhere Ram Lakshman’s such appearance in any picture. Over all he is just making a fun of Hinduism and trying to modernize the real story instead of its original form. In Today’s episode It was shown that Trijata Informed about Susain Vadh While in Ramcharit Manas and Valmiki Ramayan It was Vibhisana who Informed about Susan Vadh.

    It not only a wrong presentation of story but also a fun of Hinduism.

    • Anonymous

      The Maya sita in you post is actually form a local version of Ramayana, so its up to to producer to take it or not. And if u say there is no background music then I suggest you to watch TV at loude volume or check ur speaker settings.

  • ಅಶೋಕ ಭ ಕಲ್ಗುಡ್ಡೆ

    Somebody has to file PIL to stop this leftist/evangelicals mockery of Ramayana?

  • ಅಶೋಕ ಭ ಕಲ್ಗುಡ್ಡೆ

    No words about story and script writer anywhere in the article?

SHARE
Previous articleAttack on Arun Jaitley will harm AAP in long run: Amit Shah
Next articleA fair probe in DDCA scam possible only if Arun Jaitley resigns: PL Punia
sridhar.nithin@gmail.com'
Staff-Writer at NewsGram. With a degree in civil engineering, and having worked in construction field, Nithin Sridhar passionately writes about various issues from development, politics, and social issues, to religion, spirituality and ecology. He is based in Mysore, India.
  • Rohit Arya

    The
    media has, by and large, become the enemedia as far as Hindus are
    concerned. And all the people working on the serial they have no qualms
    about throwing their own heritage into the dustbin so long as they get
    paid. Which is the other problem, the Hindu
    disdain for their own culture. Legal routes are too time consuming to
    be effective and the disclaimer loophole is already there. Violent
    protests work but they are not an option, I really do not see what can
    be done except small candles like this in an enthusiastically welcomed
    darkness. The leftist are determined to attack everything Hindu and turn
    it to rubble.

  • rep

    Dude you need to get a life

    • and you need to go fuck yourself!

    • thesteelguy

      why don’t you go about yours

  • thesteelguy

    Great piece! Thank you for writing this. Hope the word spreads!

  • NagBelad

    A lot of garbage on Indian tv channels do not surprise me at all. Indian TV, “intelligentsia” in collusion with leftists will be the cause of destruction of Bharat after Islamic rule and Colonial Europeans.

    • Arya

      most people involved in Bollywood movies and Indian serials are secular leftists

  • Chandrakala Radhakrishnan

    Please read sita by devdutt pattanaik before posting such stuff. There are references not only to Ramayana as authored by Valmiki but countless others too.

  • Mayank

    The intellectual honesty and the professionalism have been missing in current time story-tellers. There ignorance of dharmic ideas is clearly visible in their work, we need credible people in this field who do their work with utmost authenticuty.

  • Vince
  • Liquid8r

    Dude, watch the serial – they say the story line is from Tulsi Ramayan. So what’s the point of comparing it with Valmiki Ramayan and drawing your conclusion. Research before you write.

  • V. Madhukar Kamath

    We have skipped watching the serial on ‘Siya Ke Ram’ which is clearly an attempt to twist the Ramayana to suit the PRESENT NEEDS of the so called secular Indians.

  • So

    Not a big fan of the serial however, what is right, is right. Please get yourself educated before lashing out in a full page rant.

    The serial does not claim to be based on Valmiki Ramayan alone. There are various versions of Ramayan. Please research your work before posting anything on a public forum.

    Perhaps, you can start here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versions_of_Ramayana

    • Arya

      yes but orginal is valmiki Ramayana and normally Hindus base it on this ramayana

      • vik

        Whichever version it is following, it doesn’t portray the facts accurately.

  • Dhaval Yash Das

    JAI SRI RAM
    Thanks for this amazing article, indeed Rishishring was so innocent, he never saw a women in his life, the women’s who came to seduce him, she hugged rishi and took him to the Kingdom of King Romapaads…he took those women’s as a divine saints with wonderful bodies and their bodily features as he explains to his father, he never knew the difference between male and female, father warns him about demons in mayawi swarupa, however things works by Gods will and those women’s somehow takes rishi to the kingdom, assuming those women’s as rishis he sits in their cruise which looked like a palace, so huge with pools and huge houses indeed, he reaches the kingdom of King Romapaads. When his father comes to know. With anger he visits the kingdom…..all praja were been asked to glorify his father and rishi shring….he was happy and accepted the destiny. This is what even i heard from gurudev acc to valmiki ramayan.

    Even Ashwamedha yagya…those Horse also known as a Shyam karna, these specialised horse were born with one ear shyam/blackish coloured. They were given birth only and only for ashwamedhA yagya and not for riding. The horse after wandering the Akhanda bharata/entire bhumandal comes to the kingdom…tired, wounded due to so much of travelling….was then put in fire and he got a divine body, got liberated to higher specie of life or attain heavenly planet . It wasn’t himsa but dharma for chakravarti kings.

    Ramanand sagarjis Ramayan is very much authentic, can say around 90% as mentioned in Ramayan but bit incomplete but far much better then modern ramayan.

  • Asmita Jain

    You do know that there are other Ramayanas besides Valmiki Ramayana, right? And the makers have not stated anywhere that they are following Valmiki Ramayana. Though i agree that there is an absence of Sita’s perspective as touted but otherwise you cannot ask anybody to follow a mythological ‘truth’ in a ‘fictional’ serial.

    • Varinder Singh

      Who told u Ramayana is myth. Its just a hear say people say. Its not a myth. The only mythological part about hindu scriptures is the the stories they make about ganesha etc. and that is only beacuse to teach something in very simple way. Rest is not Myth. The stories are called “Dant Kathaye”.

    • Arya

      yes but when Hindus speak about Ramayana it is normally Valmiki Ramayana and Tulsidas Ramayana which is based on Valmiki as it is the original Ramayana

    • vik

      Please give some examples of other Ramayanas and how they are different from Valmiki Ramayana. Doesn’t matter which Ramayana they are following, it would be great for you to show which “other” Ramayana they are following. Ramayana was not written on “Patriarchal Ram’s” perspective as well. And it isn’t mythology.

  • Shaily Chaudhary

    This serial is influenced by Devdutt Pattnaik’ ‘Sita’s Ram’ book… the story of Shanta is totally based on the lines of thought of Devdutt Pattnaik.
    Here goes the article:
    http://devdutt.com/articles/indian-mythology/the-story-of-rams-elder-sister.html

  • Geetanjali Mukherjee

    I like the serial… Its entertaining and informative. It inspired me to learn all about Lord Ram. I would like to read the Ramacharitamanas and develop my own perspective… thanks to the makers of Siya Ke Ram… period. Your article seems shallow. Please read the Ramayana by Valmiki and Tulsidas and then come up with a piece. Silly boy Nitin!

  • Varinder Singh

    Hi Nithin, I completely agree with u. The chracters are shown like they show in there saas bahu serials. The writers have absolutely no knowledge about charcters of rishis, dashrath, lakshman etc. Leave beside charater of Ram. I my view such serials should not be allowed to be made. As character of Ram is bigger than words and can only be realize through proper readings and knowledge of vedas. Leave beside ram I am frustrated the way they have shown Raavan. I mean he is Asur but he possess grate knowlege. He was considered as maha pandit of his time. The way they show him is like he is an idiot. Like movie villlians.
    Its just amazing how the whole hindu commmunity is stting and watching this show. And no body saying anything against it. Everytime I watch this serials I feel frustrated.
    Someone should file case against them. I am willing to support. I live in Canada, so can’t be physically there but. Willing to support the best I can.
    Varinder Singh

  • Romeo

    Those mighty Asura’s, set out from Lanka LIKE THE GODS leaving Amaravati – Valmiki Ramayana ha ha you can depict Rama and his Vanara army as tribals too ha ha.

    Danava WHITE AS THE CLOUDS… Adi Parva. Davana was a branch of Asura. Kalayavana whose father was Brahmin was an asura too. See, Asura’s are not really dark ha ha.

  • Romeo

    In mythology, if you think, the #1 Aryan should be Vaivasvata Manu, a south Indian king, the manu of current Manavantara ha ha.

  • Shodasi : Secrets of the Ramayana

    Author : Seshendra Sharma

    for reviews and other details :

    http://www.facebook.com/shodasi/

    Thanks / Regards

  • Sinog

    Star Plus is owned by Fox Network -> Rupert Murdoch.

  • கே மோகன் ஹைதராபாத்

    Ban the serial as it is giving distorted version and increasing the blood pressure of the ardent devotees of Sita and Ram

  • Gurpreet Singh

    where is the Sanjeevani Booti??
    and how come Garud Dev sucked the poison of Naag Baan. was the naag baan in the script ??
    and how come Lakshman as well as Raam were injured ?????
    total shit this is
    I am watching this serial to know what all situations Sita has gone through?? but here the whole Ramayana is deviated from its actual script. May Lord Raam forgive them.

  • Chandrakanth

    across India we see Lord Hanuman’s scrulpture carrying Sanjivini hill, where is this scene, and Shri Ram loosing his life to Indrajit!!?big joke! definately it got its own wings, change the name to ‘directors ke Ram’. worst serial w.r.t story narating, this will be hit becz of its graphics.

  • amritansh

    nitin shridhar sir it is a great piece of article but one thing needs to be mentioned here that great vedic scholars such as maharishidayanandsaraswati and shripad damodar satvalekar have clearly stated that vedas do not sanction killing of harmless animals specially for yagya

  • amritanshjha

    sir nitin shridhar it is a great piece of article but one thing needs to be added is that great vedic scholars Like mahrishidayanand saraswati and shripad damodar satvalekar have clearly stated that vedas do not sanction killing harmless animals specially for yagya

  • Anonymous

    Narrow-mindedness i sense in you Mr. Nithin.
    I Assume that you know that there are various versions of Ramayana and the Valmiki Ramayana was written centuries ago and is not the ‘original, unspoiled, pure, authentic’ text of Valmiki we read today. This serial takes into account many different versions of Ramayan and other texts containing information on Ramayan and its characters.(Like Mahabharat). And in episodes they do mention at bottom in hindi with significant font size that from where this was taken, only if the piece of story is too much unknown. Also the serial is based on Devdutt Pattnaik’s book.

    You must have heard of Amish Tripathi’s ‘Scion of Ikshvaku’. Just read that and I bet that you will surely criticize it for ‘reinventing the script, changing the story etc’. Just look at that book’s story, the author changed it so much that Dashrath ended up losing to Ravan in war and ostracizing Ram, yet the book gained positive reviews. Something similar does happen on Siya ke Ram but they potray it differently instead of twisting them completely like you said. Siya ke Ram gives the median/mean of all the important Ramayanas out there in India. Taking for example you point on ‘Rakshasas being tribal’. Ask people on what/who were vanaras. More than half would say ‘monkeys’, some would say ‘a forest tribe’. These are two different ideas on one concept. Now rakhasas are ‘other species’ or ‘humans/homo-neanderthals(another old now exticnt) human species who are totally against Dharma’ Being against Dharma and being anarchic their appearance looks like tribals. The serial shows how the events would have transpired that other versions of Ramayana show. The serial stays realistic and that’s why portrays differently.

    To the line “If this is not a mockery of Ramayana and Hinduism in the name of entertainment, then what is?” I have the answer, it is ‘a retelling of Ramayana, in a different way. Like other different Ramayanas its unique’ And I write this with the confidence that I have more than average knowledge on Hindu mythology (rather ancient Indian history) than an average ‘modern-Hindu’.
    Anonymous because hey narrow-mindedness tells people that a 14 y/o teenager cannot be so much well-informed about such things and like other kids is stupid and naive. (As a side note how many people know that there are 3 weapons of Lord Brahma and what each of them does and 14 realms/worlds in Hindu csomology. Few people i say) (Nevertheless i have given my real email if anone wants to check my knowledge)

  • Anonymous

    Narrow-mindedness i sense in you Mr. Nithin.
    I Assume that you know that there are various versions of Ramayana and the Valmiki Ramayana was written centuries ago and is not the ‘original, unspoiled, pure, authentic’ text of Valmiki we read today. This serial takes into account many different versions of Ramayan and other texts containing information on Ramayan and its characters.(Like Mahabharat). And in episodes they do mention at bottom in hindi with significant font size that from where this was taken, only if the piece of story is too much unknown. Also the serial is based on Devdutt Pattnaik’s book.
    You must have heard of Amish Tripathi’s ‘Scion of Ikshvaku’. Just read that and I bet that you will surely criticize it for ‘reinventing the script, changing the story etc’. Just look at that book’s story, the author changed it so much that Dashrath ended up losing to Ravan in war and ostracizing Ram, yet the book gained positive reviews. Something similar does happen on Siya ke Ram but they potray it differently instead of twisting them completely like you said. Siya ke Ram gives the median/mean of all the important Ramayanas out there in India. Taking for example you point on ‘Rakshasas being tribal’. Ask people on what/who were vanaras. More than half would say ‘monkeys’, some would say ‘a forest tribe’. These are two different ideas on one concept. Now rakhasas are ‘other species’ or ‘humans who are totally against Dharma’ Being against Dharma and being anarchic their appearance looks like tribals. The serial shows how the events would have transpired that other versions of Ramayana show. The serial stays realistic and that’s why portrays differently.
    To the line “If this is not a mockery of Ramayana and Hinduism in the name of entertainment, then what is?” I have the answer, it is ‘a retelling of Ramayana, in a different way. Like other different Ramayans its unique’ And I write this with the confidence that I have more than average knowledge on Hindu mythology (rather ancient Indian history) than an average ‘modern-Hindu’. Going anonymous because hey how common it is that a 14y/o is well informed about mythology. Old narrow-mindedness, kids are not supposed to know this much.

    • ಅಶೋಕ ಭ ಕಲ್ಗುಡ್ಡೆ

      Need to learn more about rakshas Pichashis if learn sankrit. According to Bavishya purana Mohammad was Raskshasa. Rakshasar are evil humans. pishasha are cannibals. Vanaras are tribals and are with Rama.

  • vyas

    Why all this hue and cry? The serial clearly states that it is a work of fiction made purely for entertainment. Please learn to appreciate each one’s individuality.
    And I respect tradition and Valmiki but this is not Valmiki Ramayan. So go with an open mind.

  • Kanchan Agrawal

    Siya Ke Ram: Distortions, lies, and mockery of Ramayana and hurting faith of Hinduism.

    The serial make a fun of character of sita while he showed Sita imprisoned by Ravan and insulted in Lanka wearing iron chain. Its not written any where in any Ramayana. May I know the source which The producer of the serial refering to this serial.
    Secondly There is no presentation no back ground music in serial as it was in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan made 30 yeare prior to this serial. Even there is no background prepared for the war. No story we ever heard about

    Tarini that Ravan had a son who was devote of Vishnu. Even sita did nothing While sitting under Ashoka and no body tries to meet her from Ravan’s Family. No story ever heard about Shurpnakha’a attempt to kill or insult Sita as it was shown in Siya ke Ram. War presentation is also very poor while the technology is more developed in 30 years. The war presentation 100 times much better in Ramanand Ragar’s Ramayan made before 30 years.
    There is also a fun of war between the great warrior Lakhsman and Meghnad. it was like two wrester were fighting aimlessly. There was no diolouge or devade in Meghnad and Lakshman. and no presentation of any kind of war, while Lakhaman & Meghnad war is the second most important war of Ramayan after Ram and Ravan. Lakshman and Meghnad seems to be fighting in mud like child not like warrior and mud therapy disguise there original appearance.
    The most important Scene of Meeting Vibhishaa and Hanuman was not shown in any episode. Even It was Hanuman who brought The God of Eagle to save Rama and Lakshmans. Here also a wrong story represented by Producer that Eagle came himself on calling of shiva. No Episode depict the story of Vibhishna’a coronation by Ram when they Build Rameshwaram Shiv-ling. Producer unnecessary focused much on Shurpnakha’s Character and 4 or 5 episode only to Punish Sita. While her role should be over after her nose was cut and complaint in front of Ravan’s for the same.
    May be Producer was follwin Star Plus tradition of Villain Lady character to take revenge or to feel jealous from other ladies. He might forgot that its a mythological story that should be presented in its real Form. Now a days the Main Characters Ram And Lakshman Seems to be carrying beard on their face. Did producer have seen anywhere Ram Lakshman’s such appearance in any picture. Over all he is just making a fun of Hindusim and trying to modernize the real story instead of its original form.

  • Kanchan Agrawal

    Siya Ke Ram: Distortions, lies, and mockery of Ramayana and hurting faith of Hinduism.

    The serial make a fun of character of sita They showed Sita imprisoned by Ravan and insulted in Lanka wearing iron chain. Its a sin representating Maa Sita in such appearance. Its not written any where in any Ramayana. May I know the source which The producer of the serial referring to this serial.

    Producer also forgot to show that It was not the real sita who went Lanka. It was Maya Sita. Original Sita was hiden by Shri Ram in Custody of God of Fire. Ravan Couldn’t touch original Sita.

    Secondly There is no presentation no back ground music in serial as it was in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan made 30 years prior to this serial. Even there is no background prepared for the war. War Presentation and technology usded in iRamanand Sagar’s Ramaan is still very much ;popular and appreciable.Today WE had 3d and 4d technology however director and producer used very poor technology for war presentation

    No story we ever heard about Tarini that Ravan had a son who was devote of Vishnu. Even sita did nothing While sitting under Ashok Vatika and no body tries to meet her from Ravan’s Family. Sita did not eat anything in Lanka however Siya ke Ram showed that Sita met Mandodari many times and taught her cooking. Preparing Kheer for Her Father in Law’s Shard.
    No Story Even heard about Bhool Bulaiya Build by Ravan. No story ever heard about Shurpnakha’a attempt to kill or insult Sita as it was shown in Siya ke Ram. War presentation is also very poor while the technology is more developed in 30 years. The war presentation 100 times much better in Ramanand Ragar’s Ramayan made before 30 years. No Opening Songs no background music in war or anywhere in serial.

    There is also a fun of war between the great warrior Lakhsman and Meghnad. it was like two wrestler were fighting aimlessly. There was no dialogue or devade in Meghnad and Lakshman. and no presentation of any kind of war, while Lakhaman & Meghnad war is the second most important war of Ramayan after Ram and Ravan. Lakshman and Meghnad seems to be fighting in mud like child not like warrior and mud therapy disguise there original appearance. No story evr heard that Lakshman fight with Meghnad alone outside of war area. Only Meghnad keep Lakshman away from Hanuman because Hanuman can protect Lakshman from Amogh Sakhti.Even War duration and argument between warriors are nowhere is serial

    The most important Scene of Meeting Vibhishaa and Hanuman was noshown in any episode. Even It was Hanuman who brought The God of Eagle to save Rama and Lakshman. Here is also a wrong story represented by Producer that Eagle came himself on calling of Lord shiva. No Episode depict the story of Vibhishna’s coronation by Ram when they Build Rameshwaram Shiv-ling. Producer unnecessary focused much on Shurpnakha’s Character and 4 or 5 episode only to Punish Sita. While her role should be over after her nose was cut and complaint in front of Ravan’s for the same.
    May be Producer was following Star Plus tradition of Villain Lady character to take revenge or to feel jealous from other ladies. He might forgot that its a mythological story that should be presented in its real Form. Now a days the Main Characters Ram And Lakshman Seems to be carrying beard on their face. Did producer have seen anywhere Ram Lakshman’s such appearance in any picture. Over all he is just making a fun of Hinduism and trying to modernize the real story instead of its original form. In Today’s episode It was shown that Trijata Informed about Susain Vadh While in Ramcharit Manas and Valmiki Ramayan It was Vibhisana who Informed about Susan Vadh.

    It not only a wrong presentation of story but also a fun of Hinduism.

    • Anonymous

      The Maya sita in you post is actually form a local version of Ramayana, so its up to to producer to take it or not. And if u say there is no background music then I suggest you to watch TV at loude volume or check ur speaker settings.

  • ಅಶೋಕ ಭ ಕಲ್ಗುಡ್ಡೆ

    Somebody has to file PIL to stop this leftist/evangelicals mockery of Ramayana?

  • ಅಶೋಕ ಭ ಕಲ್ಗುಡ್ಡೆ

    No words about story and script writer anywhere in the article?