Friday April 26, 2019
Home Opinion 3 of 4 compan...

3 of 4 companies adulterating, misbranding food go unpunished



New Delhi: Three of every four companies found guilty of misbranding or selling adulterated food products get away without any punishment, according to health ministry records, even as Nestle India and the instant-noodle industry continue to suffer what now appears to have been an exaggerated scare over contaminants.

Canada, Britain, Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand have all found Maggi two-minute noodles to be safe, as have many Indian states, and while legal proceedings continue, the controversy is a reflection of how food-safety procedures unfold in India.

Over the past seven years, about 25 per cent of 53,406 companies against whom prosecution was launched for violating food safety laws were convicted. As many as 72,861 companies were found guilty of misbranding and adulteration during the period.

As many as 72,200 samples of foodstuff, such as dal, ghee and sugar, were collected from across India last year. Of these, 13,571 (about 18 percent) were found adulterated and substandard.

Experts say that the low conviction rate is one of the primary reasons for the rise of adulterated food in the market during the past five years. The percentage of adulterated food tested by government has risen from 8 percent in 2008 to about 18 percent in 2014.

Adulterated food can cause cancer, insomnia and other neurological problems, and adulteration is a growing concern across India, as IndiaSpend has previously reported.

Who will analyse suspect food?

Officials blame the low conviction rates on a shortage of food analysts. Last year, as a Times Of India report said, Rajasthan closed seven public-health laboratories because it could not find such analysts.

“There are only about 200 food analysts in the country, so it becomes really difficult to prove charges in the court,” an official with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) told IndiaSpend, speaking on condition of anonymity as he is not authorised to speak to the media.

Many states are yet to establish appellate tribunals as mandated in the Food Safety and Standards Act (2006) to quickly conclude cases where the adjudicating officer has already passed orders, thus leading to trial delays, said the official.

Indeed, the 45 percent conviction rate in 2014-15 is an improvement from 16 percent in 2008-09. The spike is mainly because of the establishment of the FSSAI in August 2011.

The food safety act replaced the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, and multiple regulations. Its implementation is the responsibility of state governments.

Stiff punishment, lax enforcement

Punishment for mislabeling, adulterating or sale of unsafe food can range from six months in jail to life imprisonment, and fines up to Rs.10 lakh.

Over the past three years, the government has collected about Rs.17 crore in fines.

State food-safety officers pick random samples and send them to government laboratories for testing, a process monitored and regulated by the FSSAI.

A scrutiny of the past three years’ records show that except for a few state authorities, such as Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Jammu & Kashmir, none of them have convicted offenders. Bihar, Rajasthan and Haryana are among the worst performers.

Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh were among the states where every third sample tested was found below standard.


Next Story

Non-specified Food and Food ingredients to be regulated, says Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)

Based on the safety assessment of the food product, the Chief Executive Officer of the FSSAI, or an Officer authorized by him, may either grant approval or reject the application

Representational Image. Pixabay

New Delhi, October 5, 2016: On Tuesday, food regulator Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) issued a draft regulation for non-specified food and food ingredients. It also proposed a prior approval for import, manufacturing, and sale of such products if they are not covered under any other rules under the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006.

NewsGram brings to you latest new stories in India

According to PTI, “Only such article of food or food ingredients which have not been permitted to be manufactured, stored, sold, distributed or imported under any other regulation under the Act (FSS) shall require prior approval for being manufactured, stored, sold, distributed or imported under the Food Safety and Standards (Approval for Non-Specified Food and Food Ingredients) Regulations, 2016,” the draft said.

“Such foods and food ingredients shall include novel foods or foods containing novel ingredients not having a history of human consumption in India; food ingredients with a history of human consumption but not specified in any other regulation under the Act; new additives and processing aids; foods manufactured or processed using novel technology.”

Go to NewsGram and check out news related to political current issues

For approval, the manufacturer or importer is required to submit an application along with the required documents and fee to the FSSAI.

Look for latest news from India in NewsGram

“Based on the safety assessment of the food product, the Chief Executive Officer of the FSSAI, or an Officer authorized by him, may either grant approval or reject the application. Where approval is granted, the FBO shall submit the certificate of analysis of the product on parameters relating to chemical, nutritional, microbiological, heavy metals, pesticide residues and naturally occurring toxicants to FSSAI,” the draft said.

-by NewsGram team with inputs from PTI