Monday August 20, 2018
Home Politics 94-year-old f...

94-year-old former SS Auschwitz guard apologizes for the Nazi Holocaust

Hanning could face a 15 years in prison if he gets convicted but given age it is very unlikely that he will ever spend time behind bars.

1
//
717
Reinhold Hanning, a 94-year-old former guard at Auschwitz, arrives in the courtroom before his trial in Detmold, Germany. Image Source: Time.com
Republish
Reprint

DETMOLD: A former SS sergeant aged 94 years admitted that he had also worked as an Auschwitz death camp guard. He apologized to the Nazi Holocaust survivors in German court that “I’m ashamed that I knowingly let injustice happen and did nothing to oppose it.”

“I want to say that it disturbs me deeply that I was part of such a criminal organization,” he said while sitting wheelchair and talking with a weak voice. “I am ashamed that I saw injustice and never did anything about it and I apologize for my actions. I am very, very sorry.”

Leon , survivor of Nazi Holocaust arrives at the courtroom. Image Source: thesun.co.uk
Leon , survivor of Nazi Holocaust arrives at the courtroom. Image Source: thesun.co.uk

Leon Schwazbaum was one of the 40 Nazi Holocaust Survivors who have come together as co-plaintiff and said he was happy Hanning apologized but that it wasn’t enough.

The Former SS sergeant is charged with being accessory to the murder of at least 170,000.

Hanning told the Detmold state court that he has never in his life  spoken about his wartime service in Auschwitz .He haven’t even discussed this with his family, but wanted to use this trial to set the record straight.

Also watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyVi2Wsql3s

“I have remained silent for a long time, I have remained silent all of my life. I’ve tried to repress this period for my whole life. Auschwitz was a nightmare, I wish I had never been there,” he added.

Nazi soldier killing jews ,a scene from the movie schindler's list . Image courtesy : youtube.com
Nazi soldier killing jews ,a scene from the movie schindler’s list . Image courtesy : youtube.com

To this the 95 year old said “I lost 35 family members, how can you apologize for that? I am not angry, I don’t want him to go to prison but he should say more for the sake of the young generation today because the historical truth is important.”

He also said “I accept his apology but I can’t forgive him.” Prosecutor Andreas Brendel said there was good evidence already that Hanning served in the Nazi camp, but that his admission could help win a conviction.

“Today’s statement contributed a little more to establish that he was there, because he admitted that, and more importantly to the fact that he knew about the killings in the main camp _ that also is a crucial fact,” Brendel told The Associated Press.

Hanning could face a 15 years in prison if he gets convicted but given age it is very unlikely that he will ever spend time behind bars.

This case is said to be the Germany’s last trail which linked with the holocaust killing in which more than 6 million , mostly jews were killed by Nazis. A verdict is expected on May 27.

-by Bhaskar Raghavendran

Bhaskar is a graduate in Journalism and mass communication and a reporter at NewsGram. Twitter handle: bhaskar_ragha

ALSO READ:

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 NewsGram

  • Mr Data

    He is not personally responsible for the killings, which is what the original Nuremburg trials were for – finding those responsible. The crime he is being charged with is not fighting against those responsible. Considering that those who did were shot on the spot as traitors, what choice did he have but do nothing and hope to stay alive?

SHARE
  • Mr Data

    He is not personally responsible for the killings, which is what the original Nuremburg trials were for – finding those responsible. The crime he is being charged with is not fighting against those responsible. Considering that those who did were shot on the spot as traitors, what choice did he have but do nothing and hope to stay alive?

Next Story

Arun Jaitely Says Indira Gandhi Was No Different Than Hitler

The BJP leader said the 42nd Amendment diluted the power of High Courts to issue writ petitions

0
Harsh Penal Proceedings For Illegal Swiss Bank Deposit Holders: Arun Jaitely
Harsh Penal Proceedings For Illegal Swiss Bank Deposit Holders: Arun Jaitely. flickr
Indira Gandhi Imposed Emergency. Flickr
Indira Gandhi Imposed Emergency. Flickr

Union Minister Arun Jaitley on Monday compared former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who imposed Emergency, to Hitler, stating that both used the Constitution “to transform democracy into dictatorship”. Jaitley, whose second blog of a three-part series coincided with the 43rd anniversary of imposition of the Emergency, also noted that unlike the German dictator, Gandhi went ahead to transform India into a “dynastic democracy”.

“Both Hitler and Gandhi never abrogated the Constitution. They used a republican Constitution to transform democracy into dictatorship,” he said. The BJP leader said Gandhi imposed Emergency under Article 352, suspended fundamental rights under Article 359 and claimed that disorder was planned by the opposition.

Jaitley said Hitler, who became the German Chancellor on January 30, 1933, got his President to invoke Article 48 of the country’s Constitution which gave emergency powers for the “protection of people in the State”. “The decree giving emergency powers put restrictions on personal liberty, free speech… The pretext for imposition of Emergency was that on February 27, 1933, German Parliament House, known as ‘Reichstag’, had been set on fire.

“Hitler claimed that it was a communist conspiracy to burn Government buildings and museums. Thirteen years later, in the Nuremberg trials, it was established that Reichstag fire was the handiwork of Nazis and Goebbels had conceived it.” He said Hitler arrested most opposition MPs.

“Indira Gandhi arrested most opposition MPs and, therefore, procured, through their absence, a two-third majority of members present and voting and enabling the passage of several obnoxious provisions through Constitution amendments,” Jaitley said.

The BJP leader said the 42nd Amendment diluted the power of High Courts to issue writ petitions, “a power which Dr. (B.R.) Ambedkar had said was the very heart and soul of India’s Constitution”. “They also amended Article 368 so that a Constitution amendment was beyond judicial review. There were a few things that Hitler did not do which Gandhi did.

 

“She prohibited the publication of Parliamentary proceeding in the media. The law which gave mandate to the media for publishing Parliamentary proceedings was popularly known as the Feroze Gandhi Bill,” he said. Since Hitler’s own election has been set aside, he had no change to make in this regard.

Also read: ‘1984 riots shut our doors to a better life’ (October 31 is the 32nd anniversary of Indira Gandhi’s assassination)

“Gandhi amended both the Constitution and the Representation of People Act. The Constitution amendment made the election of the Prime Minister non-justiciable before a court. “The Representation of People Act was retrospectively amended to insert those provisions so that the invalid election of Gandhi could be validated by changes in law.” He said amendments to the constitution made during Emergency were later reversed by the Janata Party government. (IANS)