Tuesday December 19, 2017
Home Opinion Bear ‘h...

Bear ‘harvest’ and other ‘authorized’ hypocrisies

0
73

In the early 1970s, the black bear population in Florida was fewer than 300. In October 2015, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s “harvest objectives” for the week-long bear hunt was 320 bears.

Weapons allowed included shotguns, bows, pistols, revolvers and crossbows. Rules prohibited the use of bait or dogs to lure the bears, and permitted the killing of bears only weighing more than 100 pounds and without any cubs present. 33 stations were set up where hunters had to record each kill within 12 hours. Non-compliance of rules inculcated a fine of $50 to $500 and 60 days in prison.

In 1974, the black bear was categorized as a threatened species in the state and soon, hunting was banned. In 2012, when the numbers rose, the animal was taken off the protected list. In October 2015, with 3000 or more bears inhabiting Florida’s forests and swamps, the state saw an “authorized hunting” season for the first time in 21 years to cull the numbers.

It is rather hypocritical that a nation which causes so much hullabaloo over the moralities of the Yulin Dog festival doesn’t create that much of a furor in this case of “authorized hunting” where bears are “harvested” with the likeness of crops. Even though a few other states also employ hunting seasons to cut down the bear population, Florida, being the nation’s third most populated state with 20 million residents is hardly likely to need such a rash measure to cull the black bear numbers.

Despite several protests and lawsuits, 3,778 hunting permits were issued by the state, each permitting one kill. The permits were priced at $100 for Florida residents and $300 for non-residents. While Florida has indeed seen a rise in black bear-caused nuisance with 49,000 statewide incidents within the period of 1994-2014 (according to a National Geographic article), such a step spells disaster in the direction that we have come with respect to animal protection over the years.

Though a majority of the FWC signed off on the hunt citing “environment management”, the step is “an assertion of the dominance of one species over another”, as said by Laurie MacDonald, Florida director for the Defenders of Wildlife according to a tampabay.com article.

People opposing the hunt argued that a better waste management system that ensured no open dumpsters or trash cans would ensure less interaction between humans and bears as the smell of food was the main reason that bears were lured into residential areas. Others cited human development as the main issue which caused an infiltration by humans into the bear territory.

In a report on abcnews.go.com, Diane Eggeman, division director for the state’s hunting and game management agency, said that hunting was the “only effective tool we have for managing these growing populations at large scale”.

However, co-founder of the Central Florida Bear Hunters Association Brad McNaughton wasn’t among the hunters. Despite stating that the bear season was necessary he felt that “It’s going to take several years before they work out the kinks and there will be times when it’s not pretty.”

The process undertaken with vague objectives is rather poor as it doesn’t ensure a proper surgical method and targets a random bear population rather than pinpointing individual bears prone to nuisance. Moreover, inexperienced hunters might kill bears which are too young or wound others which might result in grave consequences later on.

Such was the primitive drive to hunt that within a span of just two days, 295 bears were killed. In a statement released late on Sunday, the Commission declared the “harvest” over in all four of the state’s seven BMUs (Bear Management Units) that offered bear hunting.

While the petition against the Yulin Dog Festival gained more than 4 million signatures, such an incident taking place in the States itself couldn’t be stopped by the common man’s choice. FWC called for public input on the decision and out of the 40,000 inputs, 75% opposed the decision. The Commission still went ahead.

The muted reaction to this “authorized hunting” season shows the selective reaction of the media and the masses to animal cruelty.

While dogs are viewed as our furry companions and are thus considered a taboo form of food, none bat an eyelid at the prospect of a pig, cow, or chicken going through similar torture in the “authorized” slaughterhouse procedures.

Such is our mindset, that a tradition which predates written history in China garners a worldwide protest at the atrocities committed on dogs and even cats at the Yulin Dog Festival, but we turn a blind eye to the daily torture that farm animals go through as they are gassed, often unsuccessfully, their throats slit and they are hung up upside down to drain out.

Social media doesn’t tell us how phrases like “free range” and “barn raised” are just fancy words hiding the appalling conditions in which chicken and turkey are raised. Male chicks are thrown alive into shredders after they are born as they are deemed of “no use”. Turkeys and chickens are pumped up with hormones to make them fatter and juicier and millions of these birds are killed for Christmas this year, yet we don’t see any media frenzy to shut down the poultry farms.

Four million is also the number of people celebrating the Gadhimai festival, in Nepal, which involves the large scale sacrificial slaughter of animals including water buffaloes, pigs, goats, chickens, and pigeons – to please Gadhimai, the goddess of power. The sacrificial aspect was called to a halt in July this year and the next festival in 2019 will be a “momentous celebration of life” instead of an animal sacrifice, according to the Gadhimai temple chairman Ram Chandra Shah.

As the masses rush to sign petitions urged on by photographs of animals in distress, they forget that what the media is showing them is mirrored indirectly in the meat farms and slaughterhouses in their very own countries and states; that the beef burger which tastes so good now was perhaps a few hours ago, an animal in utter distress, lying fully conscious as a result of a missed stun attempt, and condemned to a long drawn painful death.

Next Story

Texas Gunman Practiced Target on Animals Ahead of the Shooting Massacre: Ex Colleague

Jessika Edwards, who worked with Kelley at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico from 2010 to 2012, said Kelley told her that he was "using the dogs as target practice".

0
35
Texas gunman
Markers are seen at the front f the building as law enforcement officials continue to investigate the scene of a shooting at the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017, in Sutherland Springs, Texas. A man opened fire inside the church in the small South Texas community on Sunday, killing and wounding many. (AP Photo/Eric Gay) (VOA)

Washington, November 10, 2017 : Devin Kelley, the gunman who killed 26 persons inside a church in Texas, had claimed that he bought animals for target practice, according to a former Air Force colleague.

Jessika Edwards, who worked with Kelley at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico from 2010 to 2012, said Kelley told her that he was “using the dogs as target practice”.

ALSO READ Texas Mass Shooting: ‘It isn’t a guns situation, but a mental problem’, Says Trump

The morbid admission came in Facebook messages starting in 2014, Edwards told CNN.

Though Edwards was not sure if the Texas gunman was telling the truth, the odd behavior was enough for her to stop communicating with him.

Kelley was accused in 2014 of punching a dog in Colorado. He initially pleaded guilty to animal cruelty, but the case was dismissed after he paid fines.

Edwards said the Texas gunman also displayed a fascination with mass murders while he was enlisted in the Air Force.

“He would make jokes about
wanting to kill somebody…
And we would say,
‘wait, that’s not funny’.”

The obsession was so pronounced, Edwards said, that when Kelley was disciplined for poor performance she told her bosses to “back off or he would shoot the place up”.

“He was always getting into trouble… It was problem after problem,” Edwards said.

A law enforcement source confirmed to CNN that FBI agents interviewed Edwards about her interactions with the gunman.

In 2012, Kelley was court-martialed and convicted for assaulting his wife and stepson.

Edwards said those domestic problems boiled over in the job and Kelley would come in depressed and unfocused.

After the shooting massacre on November 5, the Air Force has been criticised for failing to notify federal law enforcement officials of Kelley’s conviction.

Kelley was dressed in black and wearing a bullet-proof vest when he attacked the church in Sutherland Springs, a quiet town some 45 km southeast of San Antonio.

The victims ranged from under two-years-old to 77. (IANS)

 

Next Story

Stable Owner in Mumbai Booked for Cruelty to a Pregnant Cow after Complaint by NGO

Non Governmental Organization called People for Animals, upon learning of the incident, filed a complaint after which the stable owner was booked by the D.B Marg Police

0
24
Cruelty to Cow
An infected cow was abandoned by its owner. Wikimedia
  • People for Animals is a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) 
  • They were reported of an incident by local animal enthusiast group called Foundation For Mumbai Animals (FFMA)
  • The incident involved a severely infected cow being left abandoned by a stable owner

Mumbai, August 29, 2017: A Stable owner has been booked here for abandoning one of his cows who was pregnant and severely infected.

Non Governmental Organization called People for Animals, upon learning of the incident, filed a complaint after which the stable owner was booked by the D.B Marg Police.

ALSO READ:  India Increase in Attacks related to Cow Vigilantism under Narendra Modi Government: Report.

The abandoned cow was found wandering in Khetwadi. Local Animal enthusiast group called Foundation for Mumbai Animals (FFMA) found the cow and informed People for Animals (PFA).

Maggot infestation was found in the cow’s hooves and it was clear that the animal was in pain. Pandurang Shinde, a Senior Police Inspector told to the Hindu, “We have booked the accused under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and are conducting further inquiries. The accused has claimed that the cow wandered off four days ago, and that he too was looking for her.”

PFA member Nirali Koradia stated, “We reached out to Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone II) Dnyaneshwar Chavan, and he directed his officers to take action.”

The Stable owner, who sells milk for living, claims that the cow wandered off on its own. The cow is being treated for her infections. The FFMA has also claimed that this same person has been booked for cruelty earlier.


NewsGram is a Chicago-based non-profit media organization. We depend upon support from our readers to maintain our objective reporting. Show your support by Donating to NewsGram. Donations to NewsGram are tax-exempt.

Click Here- Newsgram.com/donate

Next Story

For the First Time in USA, 53-year-old convict Mark Asay was Executed using Etomidate in Lethal Injection

Etomidate is the drug which was used for Mark Asay's execution

0
47
Mark Asay was executed using Etomidate
Mark Asay was executed using Etomidate. Pixabay
  • Etomidate was invented by scientists from Janssen Pharmaceuticals 
  • The reason behind conviction of Mark Asay last year was that in 1988 he racially motivated killing of 2 men in Jacksonville, Florida
  • Before he shot Booker, he called him a racial epithet

Florida (USA), August 25, 2017: A 53-year-old convict Mark Asay was executed using a new drug called Etomidate for lethal injection on 24 August 2017. This drug has not been used before in the US.

Mark Asay was executed reportedly and one of the three drugs used for lethal injection was etomidate. It’s the first time that in execution they used the drug etomidate.

Earlier midazolam was used for executions but now it is harder to get this drug as some drug manufacturers didn’t want it to be used for executions. Now, Etomidate is a substitution for midazolam.

According to CNN report, Greg Panico, spokesman for the company said, “Etomidate, an intravenous anesthetic, was invented by scientists from Janssen Pharmaceuticals in the 1960s

According to WJAX report, “This month, the Florida Supreme Court rejected arguments from Mark Asay’s attorneys that the new drug would cause too much pain.”  Florida’s highest court said that the inmate Mark Asay had not shown that it would result in more pain and dismissed a motion to block the execution.

The reason behind conviction of Mark Asay last year was that in 1988 he racially motivated killing of 2 men in Jacksonville, Florida.

Also Read: Women-Centric Drug Rehabilitation Centers in Hyderabad is Saving Young Girls from Recreational Drugs like LSD

The two men whom the jury found him guilty of murdering were Robert Lee Booker, who was black and Robert McDowell.  “Before he shot Booker, he called him a racial epithet. Prosecutors say he killed McDowell, who was dressed as a woman, after saying he would pay him for sex,” mentions WJAX report.

“The execution marks Florida’s first since The US Supreme Court ruling temporarily halted the practice in early 2016, saying the state’s sentencing process was unconstitutional because it gave judges, rather than juries, too much power in deciding whether to execute an inmate,” mentions CNN report.

On 24 August 2017, US Supreme Court denied a stay for execution request in Asay’s case and it was scheduled that he would die by injection after 6 p.m. EST. It was also revealed that Asay didn’t have any pending petitions along with the Florida Supreme Court.

In 1979, the death penalty was reinstituted by the state and since then, Mark James Asay is the first white man to be sentenced for the death penalty in Florida for killing a black man.


 

NewsGram is a Chicago-based non-profit media organization. We depend upon support from our readers to maintain our objective reporting. Show your support by Donating to NewsGram. Donations to NewsGram are tax-exempt.
Click here- www.newsgram.com/donate