Tuesday January 21, 2020
Home Uncategorized Bobby Jindal ...

Bobby Jindal clashes with Republican rival over health care


Washington: All the 17 Republican presidential candidates, including Louisiana’s Indian-American governor Bobby Jindal, want to repeal President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law, but there is little said about what would come in its place.

An intra-party feud broke out Tuesday over the Affordable Care Act with Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker unveiling a plan to replace “Obamacare” and Jindal immediately attacking it on the campaign trail.

Bobby_Jindal_CPAC_2013_BWalker’s plan “makes the mistake President Obama did of creating a new entitlement programme at a time when we can’t afford the entitlement programmes we’ve got today,” Jindal told a lunch crowd in Le Mars in Iowa, The Advocate newspaper reported.

“I don’t think that Republicans should be offering Obamacare-lite plans,” Jindal told reporters in Le Mars. “It continues this idea of government dependence.”

“For several months now, I’ve been the only candidate to offer a detailed plan,” said Jindal continuing the tirade at a forum in Council Bluffs, Iowa, on Tuesday night. “It’s one thing to give a speech, but it’s another to give details.”

Walker’s plan calls for the creation of a refundable tax credit for individuals who do not have employer-based coverage.

That’s what Jindal has pointed to as an “entitlement” in the plan, though he previously has expressed support for some refundable tax credits for health care, the Advocate noted.

Jindal later challenged Walker to a debate over health care in Iowa, via Twitter and an email blast from his campaign.

“Walker’s plan is getting rave reviews from the conservative movement for being a thoughtful, substantive and viable plan to repeal and replace Obamacare and make health care affordable and accessible for Americans,” Walker’s campaign said in an email to The Advocate

“The refundable health care tax credits the governor includes have been supported by many conservatives because they put health care decision-making in the hands of the American people where it belongs.”

Since 2010, Republicans have pledged to repeal and replace Obamacare. The Republican controlled House “has voted 56 times to repeal or undermine the law, but zero times on a plan to replace it,” the Washington Post pointed out on Tuesday.

All the 17 Republicans candidates too have promised to repeal the law, “but most of them have said relatively little about what they’d put in its place,” the influential newspaper noted.

Front-runner Donald Trump, for instance, has said that his replacement would be “something terrific” and that it would involve making an unspecified deal with hospitals to treat the poor and uninsured.

“We are going to have to work out some kind of a very, very smart deal with hospitals,” he told CNN when asked how.


Next Story

Future of Obamacare at Stake as U.S. Federal Appeals Court Weighs its Constitutionality

Obamacare is the popular name given to the 2010 Affordable Care Act

Obamacare, US Federal, Court
FILE - A Tea Party member reaches for a pamphlet titled "The Impact of Obamacare," at a "Food for Free Minds Tea Party Rally" in Littleton, New Hampshire, Oct. 27, 2012. VOA

The future of Obamacare is at stake as a U.S. federal appeals court considers whether to uphold a judge’s ruling that the entire health care reform law is unconstitutional.

Obamacare is the popular name given to the 2010 Affordable Care Act — former President Barack Obama’s crowning legislative achievement that guarantees health care for all Americans regardless of pre-existing conditions.

The three-judge 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans will consider whether a Texas judge was right when he declared the entire ACA unconstitutional when Congress threw out the law’s mandate that anyone who qualifies for Obamacare and refuses to buy into the plan pay a tax to help offset the cost.

A coalition of 18 Democratic state attorneys general appealed the judge’s ruling.

Obamacare, US Federal, Court
The future of Obamacare is at stake as a U.S. federal appeals court considers whether to uphold a judge’s ruling. Pixabay

An appeals court ruling upholding the judge’s decision means Obamacare could wind up again before the Supreme Court, which had already upheld most of the law in 2012.

Also Read- U.S. Asylum-Seekers Expand to Another Mexican Border City

Obamacare opponents argue the government should not interfere in the health insurance business while supporters say Obamacare guarantees millions of Americans who cannot afford private insurance can get treatment. (VOA)