Monday April 22, 2019
Home India HC notice to ...

HC notice to govt on Reliance Power plea against coal block cancellation

0
//

Credits: https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAYQjB1qFQoTCNvK0pi038YCFQPEjgodQJ8Gkg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.livemint.com%2FCompanies%2FxVzY8KHjnlvpokfvSrVAuM%2FAnil-Ambanis-Reliance-Group-Chinas-Wanda-to-form-JV.html&ei=xIKnVdvYBYOIuwTAvpqQCQ&bvm=bv.97949915,d.c2E&psig=AFQjCNGMFw6B-S3yAE3is9AJqPKKhaUAbg&ust=1437127716377216New Delhi: The Delhi High Court issued notice to the central government on Tuesday, regarding a plea of Reliance Power challenging withdrawal of the Chhatrasal coal block for the company’s Sasan ultra mega power project in Madhya Pradesh.

A division bench of Chief Justice G.Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath sought response from the central government by October 6.

The company in the plea has said the relevant gazette notification of May 7 by which the letter allotting the coal black was cancelled has been challenged. It has contended that prior to bid submission for the projects, three coal blocks – Moher, Moher-Amlohri Extension and Chhatrasal – having a reserve of around 800 million tonnes were set aside for Sasan Power, a wholly-owned subsidiary then of the state-run Power Finance Corp.

Reliance Power has argued that the allocation of the three blocks and the availability of coal in the lifetime of the reserve availability was an integral part of bidding terms and conditions. It was the main reason why a competitive tariff of Rs.1.196 per unit was bid by Reliance Power, it added.

The company has also held that the cancellation of the notification, based on a judgment of the Supreme Court, was not not legally tenable.

It has contended that the Sep 14 order did not make the coal blocks allotted to Sasan project its subject matter.

The company further contended that the court had specifically exempted the blocks in the order.

The Supreme Court had cancelled all but four of the 218 coal blocks that were allocated by the government over the past two decades. But the bench of then Chief Justice R.M. Lodha had exempted four blocks allotted to Reliance Power, NTPC and SAIL.

In April this year, the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Power had said that it has fully attained commercial operations of the Rs.27,000 crore Sasan ultra mega power project, 12 months ahead of schedule, with all the six units generating a total of 3,960 MW of electricity.

The group had also said this was not only the largest integrated coal-mining-cum-power project at a single location in the world, but that the 20-million Moher and Moher-Amlohri mines, which were also fully operational, were the largest in the country.

(IANS)

Next Story

Delhi HC Dismisses Plea Seeking Direction to Media to Use Word ‘Martyr’

Abhishek Chaudhary urged the court to direct the media to use the word "martyr" as "brave soldiers are never killed."

0
Delhi High Court. Image source: Flickr

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea seeking direction to the media to use the word “martyr” in place of killed and died for soldiers.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V. Kameswar Rao also slammed the petitioner and advocate Abhishek Choudhury for filing the frivolous application on the same ground which was already disposed off by another bench in October 2016.

Pulwama, Kashmir, Delhi HC
The plea was filed after 40 CRPF troopers were killed in a terror attack in Pulwama in Jammu and Kashmir on February 14. newsx.com

Choudhury has filed the plea seeking direction to the press and electronic media to use “respectful words on the martyrdom of soldiers”.

ALSO READ: Indian Army Kills JeM Operational Commander Within 100 hours of Pulwama Attack

He urged the court to direct the media to use the word “martyr” as “brave soldiers are never killed.”

The plea was filed after 40 CRPF troopers were killed in a terror attack in Pulwama in Jammu and Kashmir on February 14. (IANS)