Tuesday October 16, 2018

Mobile Application “Stanpan Suraksha” to Spread Awareness against Inappropriate Promotion of marketed Baby Food in India

The app, Stanpan Suraksha, developed by a breastfeeding protection watchdog, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI)

0
//
263
A baby holding a fruit (representative image), Pixabay
Republish
Reprint

New Delhi, Dec 2, 2016: A mobile application was launched here on Friday to help people report the inappropriate promotion of marketed baby food around them, by enabling them to click pictures of advertisements, displays of such products and send them to an NGO which then may take required legal action.

The app, Stanpan Suraksha, developed by a breastfeeding protection watchdog, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), also allows the users to take assistance from a number of trained breastfeeding counsellors, during their during antenatal and postnatal period.

NewsGram brings to you latest new stories in India.

The app was launched by Minister of Tribal Affairs Jual Oram, A.V. Swamy, Member of Parliament, and Arun Kumar Panda, Additional Secretary – Health and Family Welfare and Mission Director, National Health Mission.

A report on the baby food formulae being unethically promoted by e-commerce sites and the baby food industry was also launched along with the app, which revealed many instances where the staff at the health facilities did not seek consent of the mothers before administering the formula to babies.

Look for latest news from India in NewsGram.

According to an online survey done by BPNI among 950 women who had given birth in private hospitals, it was revealed that babies of more than half of such women were given baby formula and at least two-thirds out of them had been given that without any attempt to seek the consent of the mother.

“Baby food industry has allegedly violated the Infant Milk Substitutes, (IMS) Act, 1992, at least 54 times if not more, between 2008 and 2016 before being brought to the attention of the government regulatory authorities,” BPNI said in a statement issued by it.

“Promotion of any kind, for 0-2 years of age of children, of baby foods and feeding bottles, including advertisements, inducements on sales, pecuniary benefits to doctors or their associations including sponsorship is banned under the IMS Act,” it said.

Among the top violaters of the Act, it named Nestle, Abbot, Heinz and Dannone, for continuing to mislead the mothers through various tactics.

Go to NewsGram and check out news related to political current issues.

BPNI reckoned Nestle’s decision to set up 1,000 exclusive breastfeeding rooms in 150 cities and help raise “superbabies” as indirectly promoting infant formula mik, and violating section 7 of the IMS act that bars companies from entering healthcare facilities.

It also mentioned the misleading claims being found on the lables on the baby formula containers.

“Danone Nutritia ‘Farex’ infant formula uses health claims like brain development on its labels. As per the law, use of health claims is not allowed for such products of the company,” the statement read.

Apart from objecting against the baby food industry players for their alleged malpractices, the report also cited the reasons for which we should be shunning such products and cause an awareness.

“According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), artificial feeding is an established risk factor for child health like causing more of diarrhoea, respiratory or newborn infections, allergies as well as obesity and adult health diseases like diabetes and heart disease,” the statement said.

The BPNI in its recommendations urged government also to ensure that all hospitals have lactation counsellors to assist mothers during their antenatal and postnatal period. (IANS)

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 NewsGram

Next Story

Aadhaar Helpline Mystery: French Security Expert Tweets of doing a Full Disclosure Tomorrow about Code of the Google SetUP Wizard App

0
cryptocurrency. google
Pichai met with senior Republicans on Friday to discuss their concerns, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said. Wikimedia Commons

Google’s admission that it had in 2014 inadvertently coded the 112 distress number and the UIDAI helpline number into its setup wizard for Android devices triggered another controversy on Saturday as India’s telecom regulator had only recommended the use of 112 as an emergency number in April 2015.

After a large section of smartphone users in India saw a toll-free helpline number of UIDAI saved in their phone-books by default, Google issued a statement, saying its “internal review revealed that in 2014, the then UIDAI helpline number and the 112 distress helpline number were inadvertently coded into the SetUp wizard of the Android release given to OEMs for use in India and has remained there since”.

Aadhaar Helpline Number Mystery: French security expert tweets of doing a full disclosure tomorrow about Code of the Google SetUP Wizard App, Image: Wikimedia Commons.

However, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) recommended only in April 2015 that the number 112 be adopted as the single emergency number for the country.

According to Google, “since the numbers get listed on a user’s contact list, these get  transferred accordingly to the contacts on any new device”.

Google was yet to comment on the new development.

Meanwhile, French security expert that goes by the name of Elliot Alderson and has been at the core of the entire Aadhaar controversy, tweeted on Saturday: “I just found something interesting. I will probably do full disclosure tomorrow”.

“I’m digging into the code of the @Google SetupWizard app and I found that”.

“As far as I can see this object is not used in the current code, so there is no implications. This is just a poor coding practice in term of security,” he further tweeted.

On Friday, both the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) as well as the telecom operators washed their hand of the issue.

While the telecom industry denied any role in the strange incident, the UIDAI said that he strange incident, the UIDAI said that some vested interests were trying to create “unwarranted confusion” in the public and clarified that it had not asked any manufacturer or telecom service provider to provide any such facility.

Twitter was abuzz with the new development after a huge uproar due to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Chairman R.S. Sharma’s open Aadhaar challenge to critics and hackers.

Ethical hackers exposed at least 14 personal details of the TRAI Chairman, including mobile numbers, home address, date of birth, PAN number and voter ID among others. (IANS)

Also Read: Why India Is Still Nowhere Near Securing Its Citizens’ Data?