Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Home India Open or closed diplomacy: Does it matter if Indo-Pak relations improve

Open or closed diplomacy: Does it matter if Indo-Pak relations improve

The National Security Advisers (NSAs) of India and Pakistan held an undisclosed meeting in Bangkok on Sunday. A range of discussions took place according to several news reports including peace and security, terrorism and Jammu & Kashmir between the two nations.

Apparently, only the Prime Minister’s Office was aware of the conduct of the meeting. Both the countries had decided on the location by mutual consensus. This development of relations can create varied subtexts in the bordering nations, which can be generic or specific in nature.

For the cynic who like to question or know all details of strategic ties under the gambit of public awareness can, and are, questioning the intentions of the undisclosed meet between the countries. For those the prime explanation is that it is not the end of open diplomacy and yes, some information are not meant to be disclosed in the public view.

The RTI Act 2005 itself is self-restrictive in nature. The Act does not make the Right to Information an absolute right but imposes a restriction on this privilege. Section 8(1) of the Act deals with exemption from disclosure of information for some areas of governance. The section says that “Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen.”

The usual exemption permitting Government to withhold access to information is generally in respect of these matters: (1) International relations and national security; (2) Law enforcement and prevention of crime; (3) Internal deliberations of the government; (4) Information obtained in confidence from some source outside the Government; (5) Information which, if disclosed, would violate the privacy of an individual; (6) Information, particularly of an economic nature, when disclosed, would confer an unfair advantage on some person or subject or government; (7) Information which is covered by legal/professional privilege, like communication between a legal advisor and his client and (8) Information about scientific discoveries and inventions and improvements, essentially in the field of weapons.

One must realise, in an age where media yells and demands answers in the name of democracy, some information aren’t meant for the public. In such situation, governments are put under scanner and their intentions are doubted on the ground of having some implicit agenda in mind. It must also be noted that this ‘secret’ meeting must have been decided after much deliberation and detailing to better the Indo-Pak relations.

Questions of undermining nature, such as these, can jeopardise the hope of betterment in relations between two nations at conflict with each other. It can complicate the strategies and create axiomatic apprehension within the countrymen.

Also, the media are to pay special attention to mending itself from becoming exigent in nature or rather need to not represent it under a negative gambit of secret diplomacy.

India and Pakistan sought to have NSA-level talks on several occasions in the past, though they failed due to internal or external reasons. The Indian media have, in past, over emphasised on the expectations from the meet that the attempts tend to fall in the vast valleys of expectations.

What we fail to recognise is that at times certain issues are so delicate that they need to be treated with patience, sensibility and, more so, should be under a restricted debate for achieving productive results. These ambiguities at times are more certain than the stated facts.

If these undisclosed meetings between the NSAs can bring a paradigm shift in the Indo-Pak relations then why not?

It can be assumed that the NSA-level talks in Bangkok might contribute to developing a series of bilateral conversations. It may even be fateful or prudent or necessary but these talks can be the most substantive and meaningful dialogues between the two countries.

If the idea of better Indo-Pak relations is not more important than the apparent public awareness of international relation, then yes we should fight and demand only ‘open diplomacy’.

STAY CONNECTED

19,120FansLike
362FollowersFollow
1,773FollowersFollow

Most Popular

Happy Childhood May Lower Drug Risk Among Teens

If your teenage child has memories of a happy childhood, they are less likely to indulge in drinking or substance abuse and enjoy learning,...

Priyanka Chopra: Its Enlightening To Understand The Importance Of Women In Leadership

Actress Priyanka Chopra Jonas is celebrating the women who helped in drafting the Indian Constitution and says it has been enlightening to understand the...

72nd Republic Day: Time For A Patriotic Musical Rewind

As India celebrates 72nd Republic Day on Tuesday, it is time for a musical rewind of Republic Day songs. There are countless classics that spring...

Republic Day 2021: Significance of the Day and Highlights of The Parade This Year!

On 26th January 2021, the Republic of India celebrates its 72nd "Republic Day". It is the day on which India became the Sovereign Republic...

South Africa Activities To Keep Little Ones Occupied

The pandemic has normalized work-from-home and study-from-home scenarios, leading to increased face time between parents and children in the new year. While both parents...

Shilpa Shetty’s Yoga Tips To Bust Stress

Bollywood actress and yoga enthusiastic Shilpa Shetty Kundra on Monday suggested the right yoga tips to bust stress, and improve core strength and flexibility...

Air Pollution Linked To A Heightened Risk Of Diseases Of The Eyes

Air pollution is linked to a heightened risk of progressive and irreversible sight loss, known as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a new study suggests....

Study: Rise In Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Problems During Winter Session

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), also known as prostate gland enlargement is a common condition that older men tend to suffer more during those chilly...

Recent Comments