Never miss a story

Get subscribed to our newsletter


Bhubaneswar: The Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik requested Aravind Panagariya, vice-chairman of Niti Aayog, to grant a special category status to Odisha but the request was rejected.

Holding a meeting with Panagariya here, Patnaik said demands have been raised by the state government several times for declaring Odisha as a special category state but they have not been favourably considered.

“All the criteria for special category state are fulfilled by Odisha state except international boundaries. A special dispensation should be made in the case of Odisha in this regard”, he said.

However, Panagriya said there is no relevance of granting special category status to Odisha as the finance commission had subsumed grants in the division of resources between centre and states.

“The way the 14th Finance Commission has approached the finances now, there is no relevance of the SCS within that context. The grants to be associated with SCS have already been subsumed in the division of resources by the FC itself between the states and the centre”, he told reporters.

He also denied the allegation of the state government that it bears a loss of Rs 1,776.31 crore due to the finance commission recommendations.

During the meeting, Patnaik raised the issue of delinking of several centrally funded social programmes like the Special Plan for KBK Districts, Backward Region Grant Fund (BRGF) and Integrated Action Plan (IAP) for Left Wing Extremism-affected districts and sought to be restored as it will otherwise “seriously affect the development programmes” in these areas.

He said though there has been an increase in the devolution of central taxes from 32 percent to 42 percent for Odisha, there would be a net loss in central fund flow to the tune of Rs 1,776.31 crore during 2015-16.

In order to enable the state government to go for a realistic budget, there should be a single window system for communication of annual allocation and sharing a pattern of CSS to the state sufficiently in advance, preferably by mid-December of the preceding financial year, he added.(IANS) (Picture



Feminism itself is nothing but a simple movement that pursues equal rights for women (including transwomen) and against misogyny both external and internal.

"In India, to be born as a man is a crime, to question a woman is an atrocious crime, and this all because of those women who keep suppressing men in the name of feminism."

Feminism, a worldwide movement that started to establish, define and defend equal rights for women in all sections- economically, politically, and socially. India, being a patriarchal society gives a gender advantage to the men in the society thus, Indian feminists sought to fight against the culture-specific issue for women in India. Feminism itself is nothing but a simple movement that pursues equal rights for women (including transwomen) and against misogyny both external and internal. It states nowhere that women should get more wages than men, that women deserve more respect than men, that's pseudo-feminism.

Keep Reading Show less
wikimedia commons

Yakshi statue by Kanayi Kunjiraman at Malampuzha garden, Kerala

Kerala is a land of many good things. It has an abundance of nature, culture, art, and food. It is also a place of legend and myth, and is known for its popular folklore, the legend of Yakshi. This is not a popular tale outside the state, but it is common knowledge for travellers, especially those who fare through forests at night.

The legend of the yakshi is believed to be India's equivalent of the Romanian Dracula, except of course, the Yakshi is a female. Many Malayalis believe that the Yakshi wears a white saree and had long hair. She has a particular fragrance, which is believed to be the fragrance of the Indian devil-tree flowers. She seduces travellers with her beauty, and kills them brutally.

Keep Reading Show less

Ancient India not only made mentions of homosexuality but accepted it as well.

The LGBTQ+ acronym stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and others. In India LGBTQ+ community also include a specific social group, part religious cult, and part caste: the Hijras. They are culturally defined either as "neither men nor women" or as men who become women by adopting women's dress and behavior. Section 377 of the India Penal code that criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature" i.e. engaging in oral sex or anal sex along with other homosexual activities were against the law, ripping homosexual people off of their basic human rights. Thus, the Indian Supreme Court ruled a portion of Section 377 unconstitutional on 6th September 2018.

Keep reading... Show less