Thursday January 24, 2019
Home Lead Story Sabarimala is...

Sabarimala is Not a Circus Arena

Is it not funny that this Sabarimala’s case was moved by non-devotee of the temple -- Naushad Ahmed Khan and supported by a group of non-believers et al?

0
//
Sabarimala
Kerala to revise list of women who prayed at Sabarimala.

By Salil Gewali

What will happen if a bunch of lawyers gets down to perform a neurosurgery? They will definitely mess up with the patient’s body. It would be very likely the patient might die even. If you look at the Sabarimala’s issue dispassionately, exactly the same thing has happened. The judiciary has hurt the “sentimental nervous system” of Ayyappa devotees. I daresay, the non-spiritual lawyers hardly know about the “DNA of faith” and its significance in the pursuit of GOD. Faith, in fact, is a far “subtler” subject which can’t be touched, felt and analyzed with the hammer and tongs of court’s jurisprudence.

The justification of rationality without the feeling of sympathy and compassion does not at all heal the wounded belief system.  Therefore, the customary practices of “any faiths” that have been handed down for centuries, would be better if they are not crushed down by the gross weight of laws and acts.

Sabarimala
Sabarimala Rush.

Other may disagree but most of the belief system and practices in Hinduism, particularly those mentioned in the ancient scriptures, have been recommended by the seers who have “realized” a various level of truths. Those sages, after deep meditation, had understood about life, bodily (tangible and non-tangible) functions and changes of behaviors in each phase of one’s life. Various methods of rituals, day-to-day conducts and a series of “restrictions” for certain proposes are enshrined in such scriptures. They are all well intended to help one climb the “ladder of spiritualism” so that the believers will not run into the negative forces and the like. So, tinkering with these regulations and prescriptions are like the uneducated discrediting and undermining the principles, formulae, theories thought out by Laplace, Faraday, Dalton, Rutherford, Einstein… 

What is most disgusting is that some of the non-Hindus (non-devotees) and atheists are now pouring oil into the fire of controversy. Why people from other faiths have to rush to visit the sacred Ayyappa temple? Are they sincere devotees of Ayyappa? Their facebook posts/blogs and activities clearly reveal what they are up to. Maligning the particular FAITH is their prime motive. Desecrating the sacred seat of Ayyappa has become their new-found adventure. Who is Rehana Fathima? Is she Hindu? Since when has she become a devotee of Lord Ayyappa? Why is the government not taking the right step when the scared Ayyappa is being impurified? One wonders how the judiciary utterly fails to suspect such godless activities leading to a series of outrageous backlashes. One can see this as a solid testimony to the failings of our judges who can’t see beyond certain horizons. Spirituality is seemingly non-existent to them.

Sabarimala
Sabarimala Rehana Jaggesh.

Is it not funny that this Sabarimala’s case was moved by non-devotee of the temple — Naushad Ahmed Khan and supported by a group of non-believers et al? If Naushad is so clear-headed and wants to do worthwhile for the society, why is he not campaigning aggressively first against the blatant women discrimination and numerous misinterpretations in the faith he has taken birth in? After having studied a few ancient books sincerely, one becomes pretty convinced that labeling Hinduism as discriminatory to women is like an ill-bred son calling his loving mother a hateful taskmaster who doesn’t allow the son to “touch food” with hands which have not been washed properly after the latrine. To know Hindu culture well one needs to make earnest efforts and undertake spiritual practices. But the first thing is that seekers have to unlearn all that “misinformation” that has been read and got assimilated into their thought process.

Finally, those who want to criticize India being intolerant, I would like to quote the science-fiction novelist – HG Wells – “In Indian ancient wisdom, tolerance is not simply a matter of policy but an article of faith”. However, it is very ungodly to “tolerate” the rise of sinister voices that senselessly spread misinformation and hurt humanity.

Salil Gewali is a well-known writer and author of ‘Great minds on India’. Twitter: @SGewali. 

Next Story

Sabarimala Tantri Gets More Time to Explain Purification Rituals

Vijayan had said that Rajeeveru has every right as a person to differ with the court order but if he was not able to digest the verdict, he could well have quit his post

0
Sabarimala
Kerala to revise list of women who prayed at Sabarimala.

Sabarimala temple custodian, the Travancore Devasom Board (TDB), on Monday extended time to Tantri Kantararu Rajeeveru to explain why a “purification” ritual was conducted following the visit of two women devotees to the Lord Ayyappa shrine just after New Year, said a board official.

“Till Sunday he was at Sabarimala. Now that he is free, he might have to take opinion from others before he gives his reply. So we gave him another 15 days time,” TDB president A. Padmakumar told the media here.

“Generally when a normal purification ritual is done, the tantri does not need to take the permission of the TDB, but what happened on January 2, was not a normal one,” Padmakumar added.

The temple was shut for an hour around 10.30 a.m., on January 2, for “purification rituals” after Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan confirmed two women — Bindu Ammini and Kanaka Durga, belonging to the hitherto banned age group — completed a ‘darshan’ at 3.30 a.m. in Sabarimala.

“We have asked for an explanation from him (Rajeeveru), why the TDB permission was not sought,” said Padmakumar.

Photo: www.swamyayyappa.in

On January 4, after serving the notice to the tantri, Padmakumar said the purification ritual went against the directive of the Supreme Court that on September 28 allowed all women entry inside the shrine.

Action against the tantri for closing the shrine to conduct the “purification” ritual would depend on his explanation of the action, especially as Vijayan had asked the TDB to take a serious look into the matter.

Also Read- Elon Musk’s Boring Company Lays off its Workers

Confirming the entry of Kanaka Durga and Bindu Ammini then, the Chief Minister had said that the state abided by the apex court directive and had come down heavily on the tantri for the blatant violation.

Vijayan had said that Rajeeveru has every right as a person to differ with the court order but if he was not able to digest the verdict, he could well have quit his post. (IANS)