Monday February 18, 2019
Home Uncategorized SC refuses to...

SC refuses to interfere with ‘animal sacrifice’ practice

0
//

By NewsGram Staff Writer

New Delhi: The apex court on Monday denied to interfere with the religious practice of sacrificing animals to make gods and goddesses happy across the country on the plea that it amounted to cruelty to animals under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Declining to entertain the PIL by Varaaki, a Chennai-based journalist, a bench of Chief Justice HLK Dattu and Justice Amitava Roy said that how could it pass an order to prevent animal sacrifice when as a religious practice, it has the sanction of law.

The court said this as senior counsel Raju Ramachandran, appearing for Varaaki, told the court that when animals are slaughtered at slaughter houses, it is governed by rules and regulations and animals are slaughtered by trained people.

Ramachandran told the court that during religious practices, the animals are killed by untrained people causing unnecessary cruelty to them. He said that at times, animals are sacrificed during religious ceremonies in the presence of children.

www.morningflash.com
www.morningflash.com

However, Chief Justice Dattu noted that “The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act itself gives that right (of animal sacrifice as religious practice). Villagers will say that it is our religious practice for centuries to please gods and goddesses by such animal sacrifices”.

The court said that it had to “harmonize all faiths and religions”. “These are very very sensitive matters. We can’t be blind to centuries-old traditions being followed,” it said.

Allowing the PIL to be withdrawn, the court allowed Ramachandran to implead the petitioner as a party in the matter where the apex court is hearing a challenge to Himachal High Court order banning animal sacrifice as a religious practice.

(With inputs from IANS)

Next Story

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Motion Against Trump’s Appointee

The court in a brief order also declined to hear Michaels' appeal in the underlying firearms-related criminal case.

0
Mathew Whitaker
Acting United States Attorney General Matt Whitaker speaks before introducing President Donald Trump at the 2018 Project Safe Neighborhoods National Conference in Kansas City, Mo., Dec. 7, 2018. VOA

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday stayed out of the fight over whether President Donald Trump’s appointment of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general is unlawful by rejecting a motion relating to the matter filed in a pending case.

trump
Then-Iowa Republican senatorial candidate and former U.S. Attorney Matt Whitaker is pictured before a televised debate in Johnston, Iowa. VOA

The court turned away the request made by Barry Michaels, a criminal defendant in a federal case whose lawyers challenged Whitaker, a former federal prosecutor, being named in court papers as the acting attorney general after Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions on November 7.

Also Read: Attorney General Jeff Sessions Steps Down As Asked By Donald Trump

The court in a brief order also declined to hear Michaels’ appeal in the underlying firearms-related criminal case. (VOA)