Setback to the Arvind Kejriwal Government: High Court quashes appointment of AAP’s 21 Parliamentary Secretaries

The order, however, permitted them to use government transport for official purposes and earmarked space in the ministers' offices to help them in the official work

0
137
Delhi High Court. Image source: Flickr

New Delhi, Sept 08, 2016: In a setback to the Arvind Kejriwal government, the Delhi High Courton Thursday quashed the appointment of 21 parliamentary secretaries after the AAP government conceded that the Lt Governor’s approval was not taken in the matter.

Following the submission of the government and in light of its recent judgement giving primacy to the LG in administrative control of the capital, a bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal quashed the appointments.

Follow NewsGram on Twitter

The AAP government told the Court that the appointment of 21 parliamentary secretaries was made without the approval of the Lieutenant Governor. TheCourtwas hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the AAP government’s decision to appoint 21 party legislators as parliamentary secretaries.

Earlier, the government had defended its decision to appoint the party MLAs as parliamentary secretaries, saying the move does not amount to creation of a “public office”.

After coming to power in February 2015, the ArvindKejriwal government appointed the parliamentary secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning but made it clear that they won’t receive any remuneration or perk of any kind from the government, that is, no burden on the exchequer.

Follow NewsGram on Facebook

The order, however, permitted them to use government transport for official purposes and earmarked space in the ministers’ offices to help them in the official work.

Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain for the Centre had said that even if you are using a driver, it is an office of profit. NGO Rashtriya Mukti Morcha had sought scrapping of the appointments as these were “unconstitutional, illegal and without jurisdiction”.

The PIL said the Chief Minister had “no power, jurisdiction or authority” to administer the oath of office to parliamentary secretaries. (IANS)