Thursday November 15, 2018
Home Indian Diaspora UK : Victimiz...

UK : Victimization of Indian Doctors on the rise

1
//
credits: almediours.com
Republish
Reprint
gg2net
credits: gg2.net
By NewsGram Staff Writer
In a series of reports showcasing instances of victimization and racism against Indian doctors in the United Kingdom, organizations representing them have urged Indian government to take up the issue earnestly.
“There’s a stark contrast in the way Indian and white doctors are treated for the same offence. There is a club culture among white managers and doctors. As an organization, we are working for equal treatment.”, said Ramesh Mehta, President of BAPIO (British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin), to a national daily.
Discrimination begins in medical schools, and affects the person’s whole career. Harassment and bullying from both, colleagues and patients are daily facts of life for Indian doctors.
A petition that says that “current NHS investigation and disciplinary procedures were heavily biased’ against Indians, has been signed by a group of eminent Indian doctors in the UK.
Reportedly, the condition has reached to an extent, where there has been at least one incident of an Indian doctor trying to commit suicide due to alleged victimization.
Even in cases of promotions, awards and other benefits, Indians aren’t given even a slight preference, it has been reported.
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 NewsGram

  • Let it be understood. An Indian child being admitted to a “Good School” in India means, the child is being delinked from its native land and schooled to be a reliable poodle, likely to benefit many in the Anglophonic world but none in the native land. To the cultured individual or community, products of such “good schools” are an object of pity not of respect. The news item- “Victimization of Indian Doctors in UK” is a product of just that.

    Pride and prestige of a nation and its members largely, if not solely, depends on how indigenous education of that nation conditions its human resource and teaches them how to use its own culture, heritage, language, history, tradition, literature etc. as a solid base and build upon that base its knowledge of the outer world and its influence on self.

    Instead- a nation that capitalizes on imitation, its education means shameless, contemptible copying of others and contempt for anything indigenous has completely lost all sense of self respect and dignity. They can’t expect or do not deserve respect from others. “Victimization of Indian Doctors in UK” has its root not in Government’s intervention but in the system of education.

SHARE
  • Let it be understood. An Indian child being admitted to a “Good School” in India means, the child is being delinked from its native land and schooled to be a reliable poodle, likely to benefit many in the Anglophonic world but none in the native land. To the cultured individual or community, products of such “good schools” are an object of pity not of respect. The news item- “Victimization of Indian Doctors in UK” is a product of just that.

    Pride and prestige of a nation and its members largely, if not solely, depends on how indigenous education of that nation conditions its human resource and teaches them how to use its own culture, heritage, language, history, tradition, literature etc. as a solid base and build upon that base its knowledge of the outer world and its influence on self.

    Instead- a nation that capitalizes on imitation, its education means shameless, contemptible copying of others and contempt for anything indigenous has completely lost all sense of self respect and dignity. They can’t expect or do not deserve respect from others. “Victimization of Indian Doctors in UK” has its root not in Government’s intervention but in the system of education.

Next Story

Here’s How Facebook Identifies ‘Inauthentic Behaviour’

To ensure that we stay ahead, we’ve invested heavily in better technology and more people.

0
Fake News, Facebook, dating
This photo shows the logo for Facebook on screens at the Nasdaq MarketSite, in New York's Times Square. VOA

Facebook announced Friday that it had removed 82 Iranian-linked accounts on Facebook and Instagram. A Facebook spokesperson answered VOA’s questions about its process and efforts to detect what it calls “coordinated inauthentic behavior” by accounts pretending to be U.S. and U.K. citizens and aimed at U.S. and U.K. audiences.

Q: Facebook’s post says there were 7 “events hosted.” Any details about where, when, who?

A: Of seven events, the first was scheduled for February 2016, and the most recent was scheduled for June 2018. One hundred and ten people expressed interest in at least one of these events, and two events received no interest. We cannot confirm whether any of these events actually occurred. Some appear to have been planned to occur only online. The themes are similar to the rest of the activity we have described.

Q: Is there any indication this was an Iranian government-linked program?

A: We recently discussed the challenges involved with determining who is behind information operations. In this case, we have not been able to determine any links to the Iranian government, but we are continuing to investigate. Also, Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab has shared their take on the content in this case here.

facebook
Iranians surf the internet at a cafe in Tehran, Iran, Sept, 17, 2013. In Iran, a government push for a ‘halal’ internet means more control after protests.. VOA

Q: How long was the time between discovering this and taking down the pages?

A: We first detected this activity one week ago. As soon as we detected this activity, the teams in our elections war room worked quickly to investigate and remove these bad actors. Given the elections, we took action as soon as we’d completed our initial investigation and shared the information with U.S. and U.K. government officials, U.S. law enforcement, Congress, other technology companies and the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab.

Q: How have you improved the reporting processes in the past year to speed the ability to remove such content?

A: Just to clarify, today’s takedown was a result of our teams proactively discovering suspicious signals on a page that appeared to be run by Iranian users. From there, we investigated and found the set of pages, groups and accounts that we removed today.

To your broader question on how we’ve improved over the past two years: To ensure that we stay ahead, we’ve invested heavily in better technology and more people. There are now over 20,000 people working on safety and security at Facebook, and thanks to improvements in artificial intelligence we detect many fake accounts, the root cause of so many issues, before they are even created. We’re also working more closely with governments, law enforcement, security experts and other companies because no one organization can do this on its own.

Facebook, Child nudity
This photo shows a Facebook app icon on a smartphone in New York. VOA

Q: How many people do you have monitoring content in English now? In Persian?

A: We have over 7,500 content reviewers globally. We don’t provide breakdowns of the number of people working in specific languages or regions because that alone doesn’t reflect the number of people working to review content for a particular country or region at any particular time.

Q: How are you training people to spot this content? What’s the process?

A: To be clear, today’s takedown was the result of an internal investigation involving a combination of manual work by our teams of skilled investigators and data science teams using automated tools to look for larger patterns to identify potentially inauthentic behavior. In this case, we relied on both of these techniques working together.

Also Read: Social Media Advertising in 2019: Staying Ahead of The Curve

On your separate question about training content reviewers, here is more on our content reviewers and how we support them.

Q: Does Facebook have any more information on how effective this messaging is at influencing behavior?

A: We aren’t in a position to know. (VOA)