Tuesday June 26, 2018

Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal Government is likely to add Singur movement to school syllabus

The land of 997.11 acres was acquired for setting up Tata's small car-Nano factory in 2006 and the acquisition was vehemently protested by the peasants of Singur

1
//
337
Government school
Children studying in School in India. Wikimedia Commons
Republish
Reprint

Kolkata, September 3, 2016: The Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government on Friday said it is considering to incorporate the peasant’s movement in the state’s Singur in school syllabus and sending a proposal to the Syllabus Committee for its observation and evaluation.

“(State) school education department received proposals from all the sections of the society requesting to incorporate historical win of peasants in Singur in the school syllabus. The department is sending the entire matter to school syllabus committee for its observations and evaluation,” said Education Minister Partha Chatterjee.

Follow NewsGram on Twitter

Welcoming the proposal, State Syllabus Committee Chairman Aveek Majumder said: “We will discuss with educational experts, education minister and all concerned people about how to incorporate the it in the syllabus.”

The land of 997.11 acres was acquired for setting up Tata’s small car-Nano factory in 2006. The acquisition was vehemently protested by the peasants of Singur.

Demanding return of 400 acres to “unwilling farmers” (from whom land was allegedly taken against their will), the then opposition Trinamool Congress-led byMamata Banerjeespearheaded a violent and sustained peasants movement that ultimately forced the automobile giants to shift its plant to Sanand in Gujarat.

Subsequently, civil society organisations, state government and Tatas moved to Calcutta High Court for seeking justice. The matter moved to Supreme Court.

Follow NewsGram on Facebook

The apex court on Wednesday set aside the land acquisition by the previous Left Front Government in West Bengal and ordered to return the land to the owners within 12 weeks.

“In recent times, no mass movements except Singur have got recognition from the apex court. Student must learn it. Education Minister’s proposal is welcome and it is a right decision,” said Trinamool Congress Vice President Mukul Roy.

Opposition have termed the move as “a political decision”. (IANS)

 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 NewsGram

  • asit guin

    Supreme
    court Justice Misra said the State’s policy to establish a small car industry
    would have “ultimately benefited the people and the very purpose of
    industrialisation.” The factory would have opened up job opportunities in the
    State and attracted investment. Justice Mishra concluded the acquisition did
    indeed qualify to be for a public purpose. SO , WHAT WENT WRONG ?

SHARE
  • asit guin

    Supreme
    court Justice Misra said the State’s policy to establish a small car industry
    would have “ultimately benefited the people and the very purpose of
    industrialisation.” The factory would have opened up job opportunities in the
    State and attracted investment. Justice Mishra concluded the acquisition did
    indeed qualify to be for a public purpose. SO , WHAT WENT WRONG ?

Next Story

No proposal to scrap Article 370: Centre

The Central government has no proposal to scrap Article 370 of the Constitution which gives special status to Jammu and Kashmir

0
The Central government has no proposal to scrap Article 370 of the Constitution: Hansraj Gangaram Ahir

The Central government has no proposal to scrap Article 370 of the Constitution which gives special status to Jammu and Kashmir, Minister of State for Home Affairs Hansraj Gangaram Ahir said on Tuesday.

Responding to a written question in the Lok Sabha, Ahir said: “There is currently no such proposal under consideration of the government.”

Any new law initiated by the government should be in accordance with the constitution. Wikimedia Commons
No plan to scrap article 370. Wikimedia Commons

The article, added to the Constitution by a Presidential Order in 1954, accords special rights and privileges to the people of Jammu and Kashmir and empowers its legislature to frame any law without attracting a legal challenge.

Also Read: Supreme Court seeks Centre’s response on plea challenging polygamy, nikah halala

The provision prohibits all Indians — except people from Jammu and Kashmir — from purchasing immovable property in the state, getting government jobs and availing state-sponsored scholarship schemes. IANS