After the village transformer stopped working 14 years ago, about 500 people of the Chakshyam village in Uttar Pradesh’s Allahabad district, had to travel more than 1km to charge their cell phone till recent days. Now under the Dr Ram Manoha Lohia Samagra Gram Vikas Yojna, the village has finally got its electricity back, reported an English newspaper
The houses in this village are now being powered by the solar energy.”For 60 people living in huts pucca houses, solar panels are being fitted and also roads are being constructed in the village as part of the Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Samagra Gram Vikas Yojna,” a state government employee said.
He also mentioned that the majority of the youth are well educated, but they are lagging behind due to the unavailability of electricity.
The people in the village got an opportunity to light their homes in mid 2000 but after three months the transformer stopped working. The power department later fixed it but two months after that it was again out of order, the Times of India report said.
Gram Pradhan Shiv Babu Gupta said, “In these 14 years we complained all the way from the power department authorities to the local MLA but we only got assurances. We had stopped complaining when six months ago officials started visiting our village, and then we got to know that our village has been selected under a state government scheme for solar power.”
The EC recommended disqualification of 20 AAP MLAs under the ‘office of profit’ pretext
AAP looks forward to approaching the Delhi High court
The controversy started after Prashant Patel had submitted an application to the President
The Election Commission has recommended the disqualification 20 AAP MLAs. The EC found them guilty of holding an ‘office of profit’. The recommendation has been sent to the President. If cleared, the disqualification would mean that AAP’s strength in Delhi Assembly will reduce from 67 to 47.
The 20 AAP legislators were accused of being unconstitutionally appointed as parliamentary secretaries to assist various ministers of the Delhi government. The EC’s opinion on this matter means that the AAP legislators are set to be disqualified, which could soon force a mini Assembly election in the national capital.
“This is unprecedented. The MLAs in question didn’t get a chance to present their case before the EC. In fact, we didn’t hear the news from the EC, but news channels,” AAP spokesperson Saurabh Bhardwaj said.
The ‘office of profit’ controversy had started after a lawyer, Prashant Patel, had filed an application in 2015 to the President’s office. It questioned the appointment of AAP MLAs as parliamentary secretaries.
The Congress had filed a petition in Election Commission in 2016 as a follow-up, based on this application. The opposition party sought disqualification of 21 AAP MLAs.
AAP had argued that this post did not qualify as an office of profit as there is no monetary benefit attached to it. But then President Pranab Mukherjee refused to give assent, following which the appointments were set aside by the Delhi High Court in September 2016, declaring them illegal since the order had been passed “without concurrence/approval of the Lt Governor”.
In the first reaction to the EC recommendation, AAP spokesperson Nagendar Sharma tweeted:
This must be the first ever recommendation in EC history where a recommendation has been sent without even hearing the main matter on merits. NO HEARING TOOK PLACE IN EC ON THE POINT OF OFFICE OF PROFIT