General

Judge Rejects Trump’s Moral-Objection Rule for Health Care

Author : NewsGram Desk

A federal judge has thrown out a Trump administration rule that would have let health care providers refuse to perform abortions and other medical procedures on religious or moral grounds.

Judge Paul Engelmayer said Wednesday that the rule was unconstitutional, arbitrary and capricious. He said the rule would have led to some patients facing discrimination because hospitals and clinics that did not comply with it would lose federal dollars.

Critics said gay and transgender patients were particularly at risk of being denied care.

The rule was to have taken effect this month, but 23 states and cities along with Planned Parenthood and other health care providers sued to stop it.

FILE – President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media on the South Lawn of the White House, in Washington, Nov. 4, 2019. VOA

A spokeswoman for the Health and Human Services Department said it was studying the judge's ruling and would not comment.

The rule spun out of President Donald Trump's promise to expand religious liberty protections under federal law.

In May, HHS published what it called 30 "conscience provisions" that health care providers had to comply with if they wanted to receive federal funds. (VOA)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube and WhatsApp 

Budget Session 2026: Day 2 Concludes, Economic Survey 2025-26 Tabled in Lok Sabha

Baramati Plane Crash LIVE: Ajit Pawar’s Family Bids Farewell at His Final Rites

Awareness Gap Fuelling Mental Health Disorders Among Young Indian Adults: Experts

AI-Based Eye Scan Can Detect Diabetes Without Blood Tests, Say Indian-US Researchers

Odisha 2024 Poll Data Discrepancies: BJD Concerns Remain Unaddressed Two Years Later, Raises Doubts on Sanctity of India’s Electoral Process