Supreme Court Ruling: The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a new law banning the China corporation-owned social media app TikTok [Newswise] 
World

Supreme Court Ruling on TikTok, Expert Explains Consequences

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a new law banning the China corporation-owned social media app TikTok, opening a path without precedent in the social media landscape.

NewsGram Desk

Supreme Court Ruling: The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a new law banning the China corporation-owned social media app TikTok, opening a path without precedent in the social media landscape.

Virginia Tech media and political communications expert Cayce Myers shared thoughts on the decision’s significance and consequences.

“The U.S. Supreme Court’s TikTok decision is a watershed moment for social media and its operations in the United States. The per curiam court decision emphasized the uniqueness of the technology, its pervasiveness of its impact, and the national security implications of its operations.  It represents a major change in digital sovereignty, and shows the delicate balance between national security concerns, free speech, and the global digital economy,” Myers said.

“The court held that the law was not one that required the highest level of speech scrutiny, known as strict scrutiny, and that the divestiture law does not violate the First Amendment. The court’s decision presents new questions about implementation because the original law gave ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, until Jan. 19 to sell.  Given that short timeframe, it is unclear what the next steps will be for the company, although some sources have speculated it is going to shut down on Sunday. The law doesn’t directly ban the platform if ByteDance does not sell — instead app stores cannot distribute it. Those violating the law face penalties up to $5,000 per user who can access the app. Currently TikTok has approximately 170 million users in the U.S.,” he said.

“Against this backdrop, the new Trump administration takes over Jan. 20. President Trump has signaled that he may intervene, and it is possible he may sign an executive order protecting the platform. However, there are questions if that type of order could stop the law from going into effect,” Myers said. Newswise/SP

Pune’s Irani Immigrant who pioneered Soft Drinks long before Coca Cola and Pepsi dominated

Why did doctors wear bird masks during the Black Death?

Toxic Childhood? Study Uncovers Broad Chemical Exposure in U.S. Preschoolers

5 tips to keep your hearing sound

Md. Shami ordered by court to pay ₹4 lakh per month in alimony to his wife Hasin Jahan