When researching the EB-3 route, people usually want clarity, not hype: they want to know what the category really is, what steps are involved between receiving a job offer and obtaining a green card, and where the process most often slows down. The EB-3 category (Employment-Based Third Preference) is one of the main pathways to permanent residence for workers with a permanent job offer from a US employer. It is neither a 'quick visa' nor a self-sponsored programme. It is a structured process which usually involves labour market testing, an immigrant petition and either consular processing abroad or adjustment of status within the United States.
In this guide, I’ll explain EB-3 in plain English, focusing on how the process works in practice and what common mistakes create delays. If you read only one line first, make it this: your timeline is shaped as much by document consistency and visa-number availability as by the strength of the job offer itself.
EB-3 stands for 'Employment-Based Third Preference'. It is a category of employment-based immigration that can lead to a green card for workers who fall into one of three subgroups.
Professionals — roles that require at least a U.S. bachelor’s degree (or a recognized foreign equivalent) as the minimum entry requirement.
Skilled workers — roles that require at least two years of training or experience.
Other workers — roles that require less than two years of training or experience (often associated with longer waiting lines).
It is important to note that EB-3 is a permanent residence (immigrant) classification, not a temporary work visa. You cannot simply apply for EB-3 in the same way as a visitor visa. You are moving through a multi-stage process that will result in a green card only if you successfully complete each stage and if a visa number is available at the final stage.
Most EB-3 cases are employer-sponsored. This means that it is the employer, not the worker, who drives key filings and must comply with strict process requirements. This is where confusion often arises for people searching online: while the worker may be highly motivated, if the employer is not prepared to carry out the process correctly, the case can stall.
The EB-3 process can be understood as a chain comprising three main links. If one of these links is weak — for example, if the job description is inconsistent, the proof of experience is unclear, or the timing is incorrect — the whole process slows down.
For many EB-3 petitions, the employer must first complete a labour market test, often referred to as PERM. This demonstrates that there are insufficient able, willing, qualified and available US workers for the role at the offered wage and that hiring a foreign worker will not negatively impact the wages and working conditions of US workers.
PERM involves more than just “posting a job”. It involves specific recruitment steps, set timeframes and documentation that must be kept. These details matter because PERM establishes the foundation for everything that follows. Poorly written job requirements or an inconsistent recruitment record can affect the entire EB-3 timeline.
Following PERM approval, if required, the employer usually submits an immigrant petition to classify the worker as EB-3. At this stage, two central questions are considered:
Does the job description match the criteria for an EB-3 visa (professional, skilled or other worker)?
Does the worker meet the minimum requirements for the job?
This is where the quality of your documents becomes critical. If your evidence is strong and consistent, the petition stage will be straightforward. However, if the evidence is vague or inconsistent, delays often arise in the form of requests for additional documentation.
Once the petition has been approved and a visa number is available, the worker can complete the final stage, either through consular processing abroad or adjustment of status within the US. This is when many people finally grasp the concept of a quota-based system: being 'approved' at one stage does not necessarily mean that the process can be completed immediately.
Most EB-3 timelines are dominated by two concepts: priority date and visa availability.
Think of the priority date as your place in the queue. In many EB-3 cases, it is linked to the labour certification filing date (or the petition filing date, if labour certification is not required). Your case can only move to the final step when your priority date becomes current under the Visa Bulletin rules for your category and country of chargeability.
This is why two people can both say 'I'm doing EB-3' and still experience dramatically different waiting times. One person may become current quickly, while another may have to wait mainly due to visa-number backlogs.
This is also why the exact category matters. The EB-3 'Other Workers' category can have a different, and sometimes longer, waiting period than the EB-3 'Skilled Workers' and 'Professionals' categories. So, whenever you see advice online, mentally translate 'EB-3' into 'EB-3 plus subcategory plus country plus priority date'.
A clean EB-3 case involves three things aligning:
What the job actually requires in practice:
This is what the job description and recruitment materials say:
What documents can the worker provide?
The biggest avoidable failures stem from misalignment. For example, if a job is labelled 'professional' but does not normally require a bachelor's degree as a minimum entry requirement, this can be challenged. Conversely, if the job is correctly classified but the worker cannot provide sufficient proof of experience, the petition may be delayed.
The job must require a bachelor's degree as the minimum entry requirement. The worker must have this qualification (or a recognised equivalent) that is relevant to the role.
The job must require at least two years of training or experience. The worker must provide credible documentation proving at least two years of relevant training or experience.
The job requires less than two years of training or experience. Even here, evidence matters—proof of meeting the listed minimums still needs to be clear, and the queue can be less forgiving.
A subtle but important point: if the worker gained the “qualifying experience” with the same employer that is sponsoring the green card, the evidence must be handled carefully. The issue is not that it’s impossible; the issue is that the story must be consistent and well documented.
Even strong cases hit predictable bottlenecks. Most delays come from the “boring parts,” not from dramatic mistakes.
PERM recruitment timing and documentation
Recruitment steps run on strict windows. If timelines are missed or documentation is incomplete, the employer may need to repeat parts of the process.
Prevailing wage and job description alignment
If wage level, duties, and requirements feel mismatched, risk increases later in the chain.
Requests for Evidence (RFEs) at the petition stage
Common triggers include unclear experience letters, missing details about duties, degree equivalency gaps, or job requirements that look inflated.
Visa-number backlog
For many people, this becomes the dominant factor. It is possible for everything to be “approved” and still be waiting for visa availability.
Final-stage variability
Consular capacity, administrative checks, and document collection issues can add time unpredictably.
If you want a single mental model, treat EB-3 like a consistency test: every document should tell the same story about the job, the requirements, the worksite, and the worker’s qualifications.
Here are the issues that most often turn an ordinary case into a slow one:
Inconsistent job story: the job ad, internal description, and petition don’t match.
Overstated requirements: requirements look higher than normal for the role.
Vague experience proof: letters lack dates, duties, hours, or supervisor details.
Assuming degree equivalency: foreign education may need a formal evaluation.
Unclear location/worksite narrative: multi-location or hybrid roles can be fine, but inconsistencies are dangerous.
Not understanding the EB-3 lane: “Other Workers” timing can differ significantly.
None of these automatically destroys a case, but they often produce friction, extra documentation requests, and timeline extensions.
Discussions about the cost of EB-3 online are messy because people combine different scenarios into one figure. A safer way to plan is to categorise expenses according to the stages at which they appear.
Government filing fees are tied to specific forms.
Medical examination and civil documents.
Translations and credential documentation.
The cost of professional preparation scales with complexity.
Travel and logistics (more relevant for consular processing).
The biggest budgeting mistake is assuming that all costs will be incurred at the beginning. EB-3 expenses usually arrive in phases, so it is important to consider timing when planning.
Before considering EB-3 as 'your plan', please answer the following questions honestly:
Is this a permanent, full-time position?
Which of the three EB-3 subcategories (professional, skilled or other worker) fits the role?
Can you demonstrate that you meet the minimum requirements with clear documentation?
Does the job description remain consistent and credible across all materials?
Do you understand that the timeline may be dominated by the Visa Bulletin?
Do you have a realistic plan for the final step, i.e. consular versus adjustment?
If you can answer these questions clearly, you are doing something that most internet advice does not: you are treating the EB-3 process as it is, rather than believing rumours about it.
The EB-3 pathway is best understood as a structured route from a permanent job offer to a green card. Success depends on consistent documentation and realistic expectations regarding visa availability. This pathway is a strong option for many workers because it is based on genuine employment needs. However, it is not 'fast by default' and cannot be achieved through willpower alone.
If you keep one phrase in mind, let it be this: the most reliable highlighted anchor to describe the process is EB-3 employment-based green card — because it captures the real nature of the category: employment-driven, evidence-heavy, and ultimately aimed at permanent residence.
Suggested Reading: