Key Points
The Election Commission added 139 voters to the rolls after tribunal clearance ahead of Phase 1 polling on 23 April.
Over 34 lakh applications were filed before tribunals, but only about 650 cases were decided so far.
More than 27 lakh excluded voters remain outside the rolls as the revision process continues.
On the eve of the first phase of West Bengal Assembly elections, the Election Commission of India (ECI) released a supplementary voter list including 139 individuals cleared by appellate tribunals, allowing them to vote on 23 April 2026. The update comes amid a much larger and ongoing controversy involving lakhs of voters excluded during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
The ECI published two separate lists on its official website: one of voters whose names have been restored following tribunal orders, and another of those who remain excluded. However, it did not publicly disclose the total number of applicants or the full extent of additions and deletions, with officials indicating that a consolidated figure would be available later.
According to ECI sources, around 34 lakh applications were filed before tribunals after the adjudication process. Of these, only about 650 cases had been decided in time for the first phase. Among them, 139 voters were added to the electoral roll and are now eligible to cast their ballots. Reports indicate that a small number of cases were rejected, while some applicants were already on the final roll despite approaching tribunals.
With these additions, the total number of voters for the first phase stands at 3,60,77,310. Polling in this phase will cover 152 constituencies.
The limited number of inclusions stands in contrast to the scale of exclusions during the SIR process. Approximately 27 lakh individuals who were removed from the rolls had approached tribunals seeking restoration. Overall, nearly 91 lakh voters were deleted as part of the revision exercise, representing around 11.9% of the electorate prior to the process.
The current inclusion process follows directions from the Supreme Court, which invoked its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution. The court ordered that voters whose appeals are accepted by tribunals up to two days before polling must be allowed to vote. It also directed the ECI to publish updated lists by 21 April for the first phase and by 27 April 2026 for the second phase.
The ECI complied by releasing booth-wise lists that voters can access online. Individuals can check their status by entering their Assembly constituency and booth number, or by using their EPIC or voter ID number. Booths where tribunal decisions are still pending do not display updated names.
Officials said that a consolidated electoral roll incorporating all approved additions would be issued before polling and shared with political parties, candidates and election authorities. Voters whose names have been restored are also being informed through booth-level officers.
However, concerns remain over the pace and functioning of the tribunal system. The Supreme Court on 20 April 2026 sought a report from the Calcutta High Court following allegations that the 19 appellate tribunals set up for the process are not fully operational. Petitioners have claimed that tribunals are accepting only online applications and not allowing legal representation, raising questions about accessibility and compliance with court directives.
The court noted that a large number of petitions related to the SIR process were being filed daily and indicated that it would examine the functioning of the tribunals more closely. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on 24 April 2026, a day after phase one polling.
The second phase of polling, covering 142 constituencies, is scheduled for 29 April 2026. Tribunal proceedings will continue until 27 April, and additional names are expected to be added to the electoral rolls before that phase. Results for the election will be declared on May 4.
While the ECI maintains that the process is being conducted in accordance with legal and constitutional provisions, the scale of deletions and the relatively small number of restorations have intensified scrutiny.
Suggested Reading:
Subscribe to our channels on YouTube and WhatsApp
Download our app on Play Store